Cargando…

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review

Emerging evidence suggests that extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) may improve time to DFU healing. The aim of this review was to appraise the evidence on role of ESWT in DFU healing and impact of different ESWT doses. Databases were searched for trials comparing ESWT plus standard care to stan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hitchman, Louise, Totty, Joshua, Smith, George E., Carradice, Daniel, Twiddy, Maureen, Iglesias, Cynthia, Russell, David, Chetter, Ian C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10332991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36461894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14035
_version_ 1785070556758933504
author Hitchman, Louise
Totty, Joshua
Smith, George E.
Carradice, Daniel
Twiddy, Maureen
Iglesias, Cynthia
Russell, David
Chetter, Ian C.
author_facet Hitchman, Louise
Totty, Joshua
Smith, George E.
Carradice, Daniel
Twiddy, Maureen
Iglesias, Cynthia
Russell, David
Chetter, Ian C.
author_sort Hitchman, Louise
collection PubMed
description Emerging evidence suggests that extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) may improve time to DFU healing. The aim of this review was to appraise the evidence on role of ESWT in DFU healing and impact of different ESWT doses. Databases were searched for trials comparing ESWT plus standard care to standard care alone in participants with DFUs. Search results were reviewed by two independent reviewers. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and GRADE approach was used to assess bias and certainty. The primary outcome was time to healing. The search identified 345 papers after duplicates removed. Six trials consisting of 471 participants were included. There was unclear or high risk of bias across all domains. Time to ulcer healing was probably shorter in patients treated with ESWT compared with standard ulcer care alone (GRADE: low certainty). Patients treated with ESWT were more likely to heal at 20 weeks post‐ESWT compared with those treated with standard ulcer care alone (GRADE: low certainty). There was significant heterogeneity. ESWT remains a promising new treatment but the translation into routine clinical practice is still limited by the low certainty of evidence surrounding its effectiveness, case selection and optimum dose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10332991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103329912023-07-12 Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review Hitchman, Louise Totty, Joshua Smith, George E. Carradice, Daniel Twiddy, Maureen Iglesias, Cynthia Russell, David Chetter, Ian C. Int Wound J Review Articles Emerging evidence suggests that extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) may improve time to DFU healing. The aim of this review was to appraise the evidence on role of ESWT in DFU healing and impact of different ESWT doses. Databases were searched for trials comparing ESWT plus standard care to standard care alone in participants with DFUs. Search results were reviewed by two independent reviewers. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and GRADE approach was used to assess bias and certainty. The primary outcome was time to healing. The search identified 345 papers after duplicates removed. Six trials consisting of 471 participants were included. There was unclear or high risk of bias across all domains. Time to ulcer healing was probably shorter in patients treated with ESWT compared with standard ulcer care alone (GRADE: low certainty). Patients treated with ESWT were more likely to heal at 20 weeks post‐ESWT compared with those treated with standard ulcer care alone (GRADE: low certainty). There was significant heterogeneity. ESWT remains a promising new treatment but the translation into routine clinical practice is still limited by the low certainty of evidence surrounding its effectiveness, case selection and optimum dose. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10332991/ /pubmed/36461894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14035 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Hitchman, Louise
Totty, Joshua
Smith, George E.
Carradice, Daniel
Twiddy, Maureen
Iglesias, Cynthia
Russell, David
Chetter, Ian C.
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review
title Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review
title_full Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review
title_fullStr Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review
title_short Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review
title_sort extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: an updated systematic review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10332991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36461894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14035
work_keys_str_mv AT hitchmanlouise extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT tottyjoshua extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT smithgeorgee extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT carradicedaniel extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT twiddymaureen extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT iglesiascynthia extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT russelldavid extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT chetterianc extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview