Cargando…
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review
Emerging evidence suggests that extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) may improve time to DFU healing. The aim of this review was to appraise the evidence on role of ESWT in DFU healing and impact of different ESWT doses. Databases were searched for trials comparing ESWT plus standard care to stan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10332991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36461894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14035 |
_version_ | 1785070556758933504 |
---|---|
author | Hitchman, Louise Totty, Joshua Smith, George E. Carradice, Daniel Twiddy, Maureen Iglesias, Cynthia Russell, David Chetter, Ian C. |
author_facet | Hitchman, Louise Totty, Joshua Smith, George E. Carradice, Daniel Twiddy, Maureen Iglesias, Cynthia Russell, David Chetter, Ian C. |
author_sort | Hitchman, Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | Emerging evidence suggests that extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) may improve time to DFU healing. The aim of this review was to appraise the evidence on role of ESWT in DFU healing and impact of different ESWT doses. Databases were searched for trials comparing ESWT plus standard care to standard care alone in participants with DFUs. Search results were reviewed by two independent reviewers. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and GRADE approach was used to assess bias and certainty. The primary outcome was time to healing. The search identified 345 papers after duplicates removed. Six trials consisting of 471 participants were included. There was unclear or high risk of bias across all domains. Time to ulcer healing was probably shorter in patients treated with ESWT compared with standard ulcer care alone (GRADE: low certainty). Patients treated with ESWT were more likely to heal at 20 weeks post‐ESWT compared with those treated with standard ulcer care alone (GRADE: low certainty). There was significant heterogeneity. ESWT remains a promising new treatment but the translation into routine clinical practice is still limited by the low certainty of evidence surrounding its effectiveness, case selection and optimum dose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10332991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103329912023-07-12 Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review Hitchman, Louise Totty, Joshua Smith, George E. Carradice, Daniel Twiddy, Maureen Iglesias, Cynthia Russell, David Chetter, Ian C. Int Wound J Review Articles Emerging evidence suggests that extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) may improve time to DFU healing. The aim of this review was to appraise the evidence on role of ESWT in DFU healing and impact of different ESWT doses. Databases were searched for trials comparing ESWT plus standard care to standard care alone in participants with DFUs. Search results were reviewed by two independent reviewers. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and GRADE approach was used to assess bias and certainty. The primary outcome was time to healing. The search identified 345 papers after duplicates removed. Six trials consisting of 471 participants were included. There was unclear or high risk of bias across all domains. Time to ulcer healing was probably shorter in patients treated with ESWT compared with standard ulcer care alone (GRADE: low certainty). Patients treated with ESWT were more likely to heal at 20 weeks post‐ESWT compared with those treated with standard ulcer care alone (GRADE: low certainty). There was significant heterogeneity. ESWT remains a promising new treatment but the translation into routine clinical practice is still limited by the low certainty of evidence surrounding its effectiveness, case selection and optimum dose. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10332991/ /pubmed/36461894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14035 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Hitchman, Louise Totty, Joshua Smith, George E. Carradice, Daniel Twiddy, Maureen Iglesias, Cynthia Russell, David Chetter, Ian C. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review |
title | Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review |
title_full | Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review |
title_fullStr | Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review |
title_short | Extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: An updated systematic review |
title_sort | extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with standard care for diabetic foot ulcer healing: an updated systematic review |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10332991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36461894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hitchmanlouise extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview AT tottyjoshua extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview AT smithgeorgee extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview AT carradicedaniel extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview AT twiddymaureen extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview AT iglesiascynthia extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview AT russelldavid extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview AT chetterianc extracorporealshockwavetherapycomparedwithstandardcarefordiabeticfootulcerhealinganupdatedsystematicreview |