Cargando…
Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis
Platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) has attracted attention because of its potential to accelerate the wound healing process. However, resources for evaluating research trends in the treatment of wounds with PRP were limited. In this study, we aimed to make a bibliometric analysis of the literature related t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36480439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14047 |
_version_ | 1785070559193726976 |
---|---|
author | Lai, Honghao Chen, Guangping Zhang, Wei Wu, Guosheng Xia, Zhaofan |
author_facet | Lai, Honghao Chen, Guangping Zhang, Wei Wu, Guosheng Xia, Zhaofan |
author_sort | Lai, Honghao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) has attracted attention because of its potential to accelerate the wound healing process. However, resources for evaluating research trends in the treatment of wounds with PRP were limited. In this study, we aimed to make a bibliometric analysis of the literature related to PRP in the treatment of wounds and explore the research status, hotspots and frontiers in this field in recent 20 years. Studies about PRP treatment for wounds from 2002 to 2021 were retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI‐E) of Web of Science (WOS) database. Visualisation softwares such as VOSviewer and SCImago Graphica, and CiteSpace were used to analyse the research trends and features. A total of 1748 studies were identified in the SCI‐Expanded from 2002 to 2021. The number of publications on PRP in the treatment of wounds has shown an increasing trend, from 6 (in 2002) to 228 (in 2021). The papers published in the United States have led in times cited (14637) and H‐index (63). Though Italy was slightly lower than China in the number of publications, the H‐index and average cited (47, 28.45) were higher than that of China (38, 27.01). The strongest keyword was “fibrin” (strength = 13.07), and the longest burst duration keyword was “thrombin” (began in 2002 and ended in 2014). The largest 10 co‐citation clusters are as follows: endothelial cell proliferation (#0), regenerative medicine‐associated treatment (#1), diabetic wound healing (#2), autologous derived (#3), platelet‐rich fibrin (#4), tissue engineering (#5), regenerative potential (#6), clinical randomised trial (#7), histologic observation (#8), and wound bacteria (#9). The United States has made the most outstanding contribution in this field. Chinese researchers need to enhance the quality of publications further. Wound Repair Regen. is the most noteworthy journal. The mechanism of growth factors of PRP, combination therapy, preparation of PRP, and related clinical trials may be topics that need attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10333001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103330012023-07-12 Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis Lai, Honghao Chen, Guangping Zhang, Wei Wu, Guosheng Xia, Zhaofan Int Wound J Original Articles Platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) has attracted attention because of its potential to accelerate the wound healing process. However, resources for evaluating research trends in the treatment of wounds with PRP were limited. In this study, we aimed to make a bibliometric analysis of the literature related to PRP in the treatment of wounds and explore the research status, hotspots and frontiers in this field in recent 20 years. Studies about PRP treatment for wounds from 2002 to 2021 were retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI‐E) of Web of Science (WOS) database. Visualisation softwares such as VOSviewer and SCImago Graphica, and CiteSpace were used to analyse the research trends and features. A total of 1748 studies were identified in the SCI‐Expanded from 2002 to 2021. The number of publications on PRP in the treatment of wounds has shown an increasing trend, from 6 (in 2002) to 228 (in 2021). The papers published in the United States have led in times cited (14637) and H‐index (63). Though Italy was slightly lower than China in the number of publications, the H‐index and average cited (47, 28.45) were higher than that of China (38, 27.01). The strongest keyword was “fibrin” (strength = 13.07), and the longest burst duration keyword was “thrombin” (began in 2002 and ended in 2014). The largest 10 co‐citation clusters are as follows: endothelial cell proliferation (#0), regenerative medicine‐associated treatment (#1), diabetic wound healing (#2), autologous derived (#3), platelet‐rich fibrin (#4), tissue engineering (#5), regenerative potential (#6), clinical randomised trial (#7), histologic observation (#8), and wound bacteria (#9). The United States has made the most outstanding contribution in this field. Chinese researchers need to enhance the quality of publications further. Wound Repair Regen. is the most noteworthy journal. The mechanism of growth factors of PRP, combination therapy, preparation of PRP, and related clinical trials may be topics that need attention. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10333001/ /pubmed/36480439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14047 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Lai, Honghao Chen, Guangping Zhang, Wei Wu, Guosheng Xia, Zhaofan Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis |
title | Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis |
title_full | Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis |
title_fullStr | Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis |
title_short | Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis |
title_sort | research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: a 20‐year bibliometric analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36480439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laihonghao researchtrendsonplateletrichplasmainthetreatmentofwoundsduring20022021a20yearbibliometricanalysis AT chenguangping researchtrendsonplateletrichplasmainthetreatmentofwoundsduring20022021a20yearbibliometricanalysis AT zhangwei researchtrendsonplateletrichplasmainthetreatmentofwoundsduring20022021a20yearbibliometricanalysis AT wuguosheng researchtrendsonplateletrichplasmainthetreatmentofwoundsduring20022021a20yearbibliometricanalysis AT xiazhaofan researchtrendsonplateletrichplasmainthetreatmentofwoundsduring20022021a20yearbibliometricanalysis |