Cargando…

Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis

Platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) has attracted attention because of its potential to accelerate the wound healing process. However, resources for evaluating research trends in the treatment of wounds with PRP were limited. In this study, we aimed to make a bibliometric analysis of the literature related t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lai, Honghao, Chen, Guangping, Zhang, Wei, Wu, Guosheng, Xia, Zhaofan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36480439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14047
_version_ 1785070559193726976
author Lai, Honghao
Chen, Guangping
Zhang, Wei
Wu, Guosheng
Xia, Zhaofan
author_facet Lai, Honghao
Chen, Guangping
Zhang, Wei
Wu, Guosheng
Xia, Zhaofan
author_sort Lai, Honghao
collection PubMed
description Platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) has attracted attention because of its potential to accelerate the wound healing process. However, resources for evaluating research trends in the treatment of wounds with PRP were limited. In this study, we aimed to make a bibliometric analysis of the literature related to PRP in the treatment of wounds and explore the research status, hotspots and frontiers in this field in recent 20 years. Studies about PRP treatment for wounds from 2002 to 2021 were retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI‐E) of Web of Science (WOS) database. Visualisation softwares such as VOSviewer and SCImago Graphica, and CiteSpace were used to analyse the research trends and features. A total of 1748 studies were identified in the SCI‐Expanded from 2002 to 2021. The number of publications on PRP in the treatment of wounds has shown an increasing trend, from 6 (in 2002) to 228 (in 2021). The papers published in the United States have led in times cited (14637) and H‐index (63). Though Italy was slightly lower than China in the number of publications, the H‐index and average cited (47, 28.45) were higher than that of China (38, 27.01). The strongest keyword was “fibrin” (strength = 13.07), and the longest burst duration keyword was “thrombin” (began in 2002 and ended in 2014). The largest 10 co‐citation clusters are as follows: endothelial cell proliferation (#0), regenerative medicine‐associated treatment (#1), diabetic wound healing (#2), autologous derived (#3), platelet‐rich fibrin (#4), tissue engineering (#5), regenerative potential (#6), clinical randomised trial (#7), histologic observation (#8), and wound bacteria (#9). The United States has made the most outstanding contribution in this field. Chinese researchers need to enhance the quality of publications further. Wound Repair Regen. is the most noteworthy journal. The mechanism of growth factors of PRP, combination therapy, preparation of PRP, and related clinical trials may be topics that need attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10333001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103330012023-07-12 Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis Lai, Honghao Chen, Guangping Zhang, Wei Wu, Guosheng Xia, Zhaofan Int Wound J Original Articles Platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) has attracted attention because of its potential to accelerate the wound healing process. However, resources for evaluating research trends in the treatment of wounds with PRP were limited. In this study, we aimed to make a bibliometric analysis of the literature related to PRP in the treatment of wounds and explore the research status, hotspots and frontiers in this field in recent 20 years. Studies about PRP treatment for wounds from 2002 to 2021 were retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI‐E) of Web of Science (WOS) database. Visualisation softwares such as VOSviewer and SCImago Graphica, and CiteSpace were used to analyse the research trends and features. A total of 1748 studies were identified in the SCI‐Expanded from 2002 to 2021. The number of publications on PRP in the treatment of wounds has shown an increasing trend, from 6 (in 2002) to 228 (in 2021). The papers published in the United States have led in times cited (14637) and H‐index (63). Though Italy was slightly lower than China in the number of publications, the H‐index and average cited (47, 28.45) were higher than that of China (38, 27.01). The strongest keyword was “fibrin” (strength = 13.07), and the longest burst duration keyword was “thrombin” (began in 2002 and ended in 2014). The largest 10 co‐citation clusters are as follows: endothelial cell proliferation (#0), regenerative medicine‐associated treatment (#1), diabetic wound healing (#2), autologous derived (#3), platelet‐rich fibrin (#4), tissue engineering (#5), regenerative potential (#6), clinical randomised trial (#7), histologic observation (#8), and wound bacteria (#9). The United States has made the most outstanding contribution in this field. Chinese researchers need to enhance the quality of publications further. Wound Repair Regen. is the most noteworthy journal. The mechanism of growth factors of PRP, combination therapy, preparation of PRP, and related clinical trials may be topics that need attention. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10333001/ /pubmed/36480439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14047 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lai, Honghao
Chen, Guangping
Zhang, Wei
Wu, Guosheng
Xia, Zhaofan
Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis
title Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis
title_full Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis
title_fullStr Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis
title_short Research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: A 20‐year bibliometric analysis
title_sort research trends on platelet‐rich plasma in the treatment of wounds during 2002–2021: a 20‐year bibliometric analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36480439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14047
work_keys_str_mv AT laihonghao researchtrendsonplateletrichplasmainthetreatmentofwoundsduring20022021a20yearbibliometricanalysis
AT chenguangping researchtrendsonplateletrichplasmainthetreatmentofwoundsduring20022021a20yearbibliometricanalysis
AT zhangwei researchtrendsonplateletrichplasmainthetreatmentofwoundsduring20022021a20yearbibliometricanalysis
AT wuguosheng researchtrendsonplateletrichplasmainthetreatmentofwoundsduring20022021a20yearbibliometricanalysis
AT xiazhaofan researchtrendsonplateletrichplasmainthetreatmentofwoundsduring20022021a20yearbibliometricanalysis