Cargando…

Sub epidermal moisture measurement and targeted SSKIN bundle interventions, a winning combination for the treatment of early pressure ulcer development

This study aimed to investigate the impact of sub epidermal moisture (SEM) measurement and targeted pressure ulcer (PU) prevention, versus visual skin assessment and usual care, on mean SEM delta scores and early pressure ulcer development in acute hospital patients. A quantitative quasi‐experimenta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Byrne, Sorcha, Patton, Declan, Avsar, Pinar, Strapp, Helen, Budri, Aglecia, O'Connor, Tom, Nugent, Linda, Moore, Zena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36575149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14061
_version_ 1785070567318093824
author Byrne, Sorcha
Patton, Declan
Avsar, Pinar
Strapp, Helen
Budri, Aglecia
O'Connor, Tom
Nugent, Linda
Moore, Zena
author_facet Byrne, Sorcha
Patton, Declan
Avsar, Pinar
Strapp, Helen
Budri, Aglecia
O'Connor, Tom
Nugent, Linda
Moore, Zena
author_sort Byrne, Sorcha
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to investigate the impact of sub epidermal moisture (SEM) measurement and targeted pressure ulcer (PU) prevention, versus visual skin assessment and usual care, on mean SEM delta scores and early pressure ulcer development in acute hospital patients. A quantitative quasi‐experimental observational approach was used. A total of 149 at risk acute hospital patients took part, 78 treatment, and 71 control. SEM deltas were recorded daily for a maximum of 5 days using the SEM Scanner (Bruin Biometrics LLC, Los Angeles, California), on three sites: the sacrum, the right heel, and the left heel, with enhanced and targeted PU prevention interventions occurring in those with an elevated SEM delta scores in the treatment group. Intention to treat analysis was used to guide the final composition of results. SEM PU represents PU development as identified by 2 days of sustained abnormal SEM delta scores, ≥0.5, after day one. The mean number of days completed by participants was just under 4 days, participants had many different comorbidities, with the most common being: hypertension, cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Results showed that following the introduction of SEM guided targeted treatments, participants in the treatment group yielded a statistically significant reduction in mean SEM delta scores (MD: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.39; P < .0001), and in the odds of developing a SEM PU (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.00; P = .05). In the treatment group, none of the participants developed a visual PU, whereas, in the control group, 1.41% (n = 1/71) developed a visual PU. Based on all the results, the following is concluded, (1). There was a greater reduction in mean SEM delta scores among those cared for using SEM measurement and targeted PU prevention, versus those cared for using visual skin assessment and usual care, and (2). the mean SEM delta scores was statistically significantly lower at the study end for those who received targeted treatments based on abnormal SEM scores. More research is now needed in other and larger at‐risk groups to further validate what was found in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10333035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103330352023-07-12 Sub epidermal moisture measurement and targeted SSKIN bundle interventions, a winning combination for the treatment of early pressure ulcer development Byrne, Sorcha Patton, Declan Avsar, Pinar Strapp, Helen Budri, Aglecia O'Connor, Tom Nugent, Linda Moore, Zena Int Wound J Original Articles This study aimed to investigate the impact of sub epidermal moisture (SEM) measurement and targeted pressure ulcer (PU) prevention, versus visual skin assessment and usual care, on mean SEM delta scores and early pressure ulcer development in acute hospital patients. A quantitative quasi‐experimental observational approach was used. A total of 149 at risk acute hospital patients took part, 78 treatment, and 71 control. SEM deltas were recorded daily for a maximum of 5 days using the SEM Scanner (Bruin Biometrics LLC, Los Angeles, California), on three sites: the sacrum, the right heel, and the left heel, with enhanced and targeted PU prevention interventions occurring in those with an elevated SEM delta scores in the treatment group. Intention to treat analysis was used to guide the final composition of results. SEM PU represents PU development as identified by 2 days of sustained abnormal SEM delta scores, ≥0.5, after day one. The mean number of days completed by participants was just under 4 days, participants had many different comorbidities, with the most common being: hypertension, cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Results showed that following the introduction of SEM guided targeted treatments, participants in the treatment group yielded a statistically significant reduction in mean SEM delta scores (MD: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.39; P < .0001), and in the odds of developing a SEM PU (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.00; P = .05). In the treatment group, none of the participants developed a visual PU, whereas, in the control group, 1.41% (n = 1/71) developed a visual PU. Based on all the results, the following is concluded, (1). There was a greater reduction in mean SEM delta scores among those cared for using SEM measurement and targeted PU prevention, versus those cared for using visual skin assessment and usual care, and (2). the mean SEM delta scores was statistically significantly lower at the study end for those who received targeted treatments based on abnormal SEM scores. More research is now needed in other and larger at‐risk groups to further validate what was found in this study. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10333035/ /pubmed/36575149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14061 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Byrne, Sorcha
Patton, Declan
Avsar, Pinar
Strapp, Helen
Budri, Aglecia
O'Connor, Tom
Nugent, Linda
Moore, Zena
Sub epidermal moisture measurement and targeted SSKIN bundle interventions, a winning combination for the treatment of early pressure ulcer development
title Sub epidermal moisture measurement and targeted SSKIN bundle interventions, a winning combination for the treatment of early pressure ulcer development
title_full Sub epidermal moisture measurement and targeted SSKIN bundle interventions, a winning combination for the treatment of early pressure ulcer development
title_fullStr Sub epidermal moisture measurement and targeted SSKIN bundle interventions, a winning combination for the treatment of early pressure ulcer development
title_full_unstemmed Sub epidermal moisture measurement and targeted SSKIN bundle interventions, a winning combination for the treatment of early pressure ulcer development
title_short Sub epidermal moisture measurement and targeted SSKIN bundle interventions, a winning combination for the treatment of early pressure ulcer development
title_sort sub epidermal moisture measurement and targeted sskin bundle interventions, a winning combination for the treatment of early pressure ulcer development
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36575149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14061
work_keys_str_mv AT byrnesorcha subepidermalmoisturemeasurementandtargetedsskinbundleinterventionsawinningcombinationforthetreatmentofearlypressureulcerdevelopment
AT pattondeclan subepidermalmoisturemeasurementandtargetedsskinbundleinterventionsawinningcombinationforthetreatmentofearlypressureulcerdevelopment
AT avsarpinar subepidermalmoisturemeasurementandtargetedsskinbundleinterventionsawinningcombinationforthetreatmentofearlypressureulcerdevelopment
AT strapphelen subepidermalmoisturemeasurementandtargetedsskinbundleinterventionsawinningcombinationforthetreatmentofearlypressureulcerdevelopment
AT budriaglecia subepidermalmoisturemeasurementandtargetedsskinbundleinterventionsawinningcombinationforthetreatmentofearlypressureulcerdevelopment
AT oconnortom subepidermalmoisturemeasurementandtargetedsskinbundleinterventionsawinningcombinationforthetreatmentofearlypressureulcerdevelopment
AT nugentlinda subepidermalmoisturemeasurementandtargetedsskinbundleinterventionsawinningcombinationforthetreatmentofearlypressureulcerdevelopment
AT moorezena subepidermalmoisturemeasurementandtargetedsskinbundleinterventionsawinningcombinationforthetreatmentofearlypressureulcerdevelopment