Cargando…

Comparison of fit and trueness of zirconia crowns fabricated by different combinations of open CAD-CAM systems

PURPOSE: This study aims to clinically compare the fitness and trueness of zirconia crowns fabricated by different combinations of open CAD-CAM systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total of 40 patients were enrolled in this study, and 9 different zirconia crowns were prepared per patient. Each crown was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bae, Eun-Bin, Cho, Won-Tak, Park, Do-Hyun, Hwang, Su-Hyun, Lee, So-Hyoun, Yun, Mi-Jung, Jeong, Chang-Mo, Huh, Jung-Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441720
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2023.15.3.155
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study aims to clinically compare the fitness and trueness of zirconia crowns fabricated by different combinations of open CAD-CAM systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total of 40 patients were enrolled in this study, and 9 different zirconia crowns were prepared per patient. Each crown was made through the cross-application of 3 different design software (EZIS VR, 3Shape Dental System, Exocad) with 3 different processing devices (Aegis HM, Trione Z, Motion 2). The marginal gap, absolute marginal discrepancy, internal gap(axial, line angle, occlusal) by a silicone replica technique were measured to compare the fit of the crown. The scanned inner and outer surfaces of the crowns were compared to CAD data using 3D metrology software to evaluate trueness. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the marginal gap, absolute marginal discrepancy, axial and line angle internal gap among the groups (P < .05) in the comparison of fit. There was no statistically significant difference among the groups in terms of occlusal internal gap. The trueness ranged from 36.19 to 43.78 µm but there was no statistically significant difference within the groups (P > .05). CONCLUSION: All 9 groups showed clinically acceptable level of marginal gaps ranging from 74.26 to 112.20 µm in terms of fit comparison. In the comparison of trueness, no significant difference within each group was spotted. Within the limitation of this study, open CAD-CAM systems used in this study can be assembled properly to fabricate zirconia crown.