Cargando…

Group size and mating system predict sex differences in vocal fundamental frequency in anthropoid primates

Vocalizations differ substantially between the sexes in many primates, and low-frequency male vocalizations may be favored by sexual selection because they intimidate rivals and/or attract mates. Sexual dimorphism in fundamental frequency may be more pronounced in species with more intense male mati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aung, Toe, Hill, Alexander K., Pfefferle, Dana, McLester, Edward, Fuller, James, Lawrence, Jenna M., Garcia-Nisa, Ivan, Kendal, Rachel L., Petersdorf, Megan, Higham, James P., Galat, Gérard, Lameira, Adriano R., Apicella, Coren L., Barelli, Claudia, Glenn, Mary E., Ramos-Fernandez, Gabriel, Puts, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37429846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39535-w
_version_ 1785070613675638784
author Aung, Toe
Hill, Alexander K.
Pfefferle, Dana
McLester, Edward
Fuller, James
Lawrence, Jenna M.
Garcia-Nisa, Ivan
Kendal, Rachel L.
Petersdorf, Megan
Higham, James P.
Galat, Gérard
Lameira, Adriano R.
Apicella, Coren L.
Barelli, Claudia
Glenn, Mary E.
Ramos-Fernandez, Gabriel
Puts, David A.
author_facet Aung, Toe
Hill, Alexander K.
Pfefferle, Dana
McLester, Edward
Fuller, James
Lawrence, Jenna M.
Garcia-Nisa, Ivan
Kendal, Rachel L.
Petersdorf, Megan
Higham, James P.
Galat, Gérard
Lameira, Adriano R.
Apicella, Coren L.
Barelli, Claudia
Glenn, Mary E.
Ramos-Fernandez, Gabriel
Puts, David A.
author_sort Aung, Toe
collection PubMed
description Vocalizations differ substantially between the sexes in many primates, and low-frequency male vocalizations may be favored by sexual selection because they intimidate rivals and/or attract mates. Sexual dimorphism in fundamental frequency may be more pronounced in species with more intense male mating competition and in those with large group size, where social knowledge is limited and efficient judgment of potential mates and competitors is crucial. These non-mutually exclusive explanations have not been tested simultaneously across primate species. In a sample of vocalizations (n = 1914 recordings) across 37 anthropoid species, we investigated whether fundamental frequency dimorphism evolved in association with increased intensity of mating competition (H1), large group size (H2), multilevel social organization (H3), a trade-off against the intensity of sperm competition (H4), and/or poor acoustic habitats (H5), controlling for phylogeny and body size dimorphism. We show that fundamental frequency dimorphism increased in evolutionary transitions towards larger group size and polygyny. Findings suggest that low-frequency male vocalizations in primates may have been driven by selection to win mating opportunities by avoiding costly fights and may be more important in larger groups, where limited social knowledge affords advantages to rapid assessment of status and threat potential via conspicuous secondary sexual characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10333282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103332822023-07-12 Group size and mating system predict sex differences in vocal fundamental frequency in anthropoid primates Aung, Toe Hill, Alexander K. Pfefferle, Dana McLester, Edward Fuller, James Lawrence, Jenna M. Garcia-Nisa, Ivan Kendal, Rachel L. Petersdorf, Megan Higham, James P. Galat, Gérard Lameira, Adriano R. Apicella, Coren L. Barelli, Claudia Glenn, Mary E. Ramos-Fernandez, Gabriel Puts, David A. Nat Commun Article Vocalizations differ substantially between the sexes in many primates, and low-frequency male vocalizations may be favored by sexual selection because they intimidate rivals and/or attract mates. Sexual dimorphism in fundamental frequency may be more pronounced in species with more intense male mating competition and in those with large group size, where social knowledge is limited and efficient judgment of potential mates and competitors is crucial. These non-mutually exclusive explanations have not been tested simultaneously across primate species. In a sample of vocalizations (n = 1914 recordings) across 37 anthropoid species, we investigated whether fundamental frequency dimorphism evolved in association with increased intensity of mating competition (H1), large group size (H2), multilevel social organization (H3), a trade-off against the intensity of sperm competition (H4), and/or poor acoustic habitats (H5), controlling for phylogeny and body size dimorphism. We show that fundamental frequency dimorphism increased in evolutionary transitions towards larger group size and polygyny. Findings suggest that low-frequency male vocalizations in primates may have been driven by selection to win mating opportunities by avoiding costly fights and may be more important in larger groups, where limited social knowledge affords advantages to rapid assessment of status and threat potential via conspicuous secondary sexual characteristics. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10333282/ /pubmed/37429846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39535-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Aung, Toe
Hill, Alexander K.
Pfefferle, Dana
McLester, Edward
Fuller, James
Lawrence, Jenna M.
Garcia-Nisa, Ivan
Kendal, Rachel L.
Petersdorf, Megan
Higham, James P.
Galat, Gérard
Lameira, Adriano R.
Apicella, Coren L.
Barelli, Claudia
Glenn, Mary E.
Ramos-Fernandez, Gabriel
Puts, David A.
Group size and mating system predict sex differences in vocal fundamental frequency in anthropoid primates
title Group size and mating system predict sex differences in vocal fundamental frequency in anthropoid primates
title_full Group size and mating system predict sex differences in vocal fundamental frequency in anthropoid primates
title_fullStr Group size and mating system predict sex differences in vocal fundamental frequency in anthropoid primates
title_full_unstemmed Group size and mating system predict sex differences in vocal fundamental frequency in anthropoid primates
title_short Group size and mating system predict sex differences in vocal fundamental frequency in anthropoid primates
title_sort group size and mating system predict sex differences in vocal fundamental frequency in anthropoid primates
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37429846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39535-w
work_keys_str_mv AT aungtoe groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT hillalexanderk groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT pfefferledana groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT mclesteredward groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT fullerjames groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT lawrencejennam groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT garcianisaivan groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT kendalrachell groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT petersdorfmegan groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT highamjamesp groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT galatgerard groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT lameiraadrianor groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT apicellacorenl groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT barelliclaudia groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT glennmarye groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT ramosfernandezgabriel groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates
AT putsdavida groupsizeandmatingsystempredictsexdifferencesinvocalfundamentalfrequencyinanthropoidprimates