Cargando…

The development and validation of the assessment engagement scale

INTRODUCTION: The quality of student engagement in assessment within higher education affects learning outcomes. However, variations in conceptions of what quality in engagement looks like impacts assessment design and the way that students and lecturers engage with each other in the assessment proc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Carol, Zhu, Xiaotong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441337
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136878
_version_ 1785070670080638976
author Evans, Carol
Zhu, Xiaotong
author_facet Evans, Carol
Zhu, Xiaotong
author_sort Evans, Carol
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The quality of student engagement in assessment within higher education affects learning outcomes. However, variations in conceptions of what quality in engagement looks like impacts assessment design and the way that students and lecturers engage with each other in the assessment process. Given that assessment is an important driver of student engagement in higher education, it is surprising that no specific measures to support understanding of this measure exist. To address this significant gap, we outline the evolution of an assessment engagement scale derived from a research-informed conceptual framework utilizing best practice in assessment and feedback. METHODS: We consider the validity and utility of the assessment engagement scale in supporting students’ understanding of assessment and their role within it using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. RESULTS: The resultant nine-item assessment engagement scale’s underpinning two factors included: (i) Understanding of the Assessment Context (UAC) including one’s role within it, and confidence in navigating assessment requirement, and (ii) Realising Engagement Opportunities (REO) (i.e., willingness to engage and ability to utilise the assessment context effectively to support one’s understanding). Construct, criterion, and convergent validity of the scale were established. DISCUSSION: The AES is a powerful tool in promoting dialogue between lecturers and students about what high quality engagement in assessment looks like, and the respective roles of all parties in realising this. Implications for assessment practices are discussed along with the potential of the scale as a predictive and developmental tool to support enhancements in assessment design and student learning outcomes in higher education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10333491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103334912023-07-12 The development and validation of the assessment engagement scale Evans, Carol Zhu, Xiaotong Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: The quality of student engagement in assessment within higher education affects learning outcomes. However, variations in conceptions of what quality in engagement looks like impacts assessment design and the way that students and lecturers engage with each other in the assessment process. Given that assessment is an important driver of student engagement in higher education, it is surprising that no specific measures to support understanding of this measure exist. To address this significant gap, we outline the evolution of an assessment engagement scale derived from a research-informed conceptual framework utilizing best practice in assessment and feedback. METHODS: We consider the validity and utility of the assessment engagement scale in supporting students’ understanding of assessment and their role within it using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. RESULTS: The resultant nine-item assessment engagement scale’s underpinning two factors included: (i) Understanding of the Assessment Context (UAC) including one’s role within it, and confidence in navigating assessment requirement, and (ii) Realising Engagement Opportunities (REO) (i.e., willingness to engage and ability to utilise the assessment context effectively to support one’s understanding). Construct, criterion, and convergent validity of the scale were established. DISCUSSION: The AES is a powerful tool in promoting dialogue between lecturers and students about what high quality engagement in assessment looks like, and the respective roles of all parties in realising this. Implications for assessment practices are discussed along with the potential of the scale as a predictive and developmental tool to support enhancements in assessment design and student learning outcomes in higher education. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10333491/ /pubmed/37441337 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136878 Text en Copyright © 2023 Evans and Zhu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Evans, Carol
Zhu, Xiaotong
The development and validation of the assessment engagement scale
title The development and validation of the assessment engagement scale
title_full The development and validation of the assessment engagement scale
title_fullStr The development and validation of the assessment engagement scale
title_full_unstemmed The development and validation of the assessment engagement scale
title_short The development and validation of the assessment engagement scale
title_sort development and validation of the assessment engagement scale
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441337
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136878
work_keys_str_mv AT evanscarol thedevelopmentandvalidationoftheassessmentengagementscale
AT zhuxiaotong thedevelopmentandvalidationoftheassessmentengagementscale
AT evanscarol developmentandvalidationoftheassessmentengagementscale
AT zhuxiaotong developmentandvalidationoftheassessmentengagementscale