Cargando…

Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers

This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of 2 fenofibric acid formulations under fasting and fed conditions. The reference was a 135 mg capsule, while the test was a 110 mg enteric-coated tablet. This randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover phase 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Yu-Bin, Kim, Jae Hoon, Song, Ji Hye, Jung, WonTae, Nam, Kyu-Yeol, Kim, Nyung, Choi, Youn-Woong, Cho, SangMin, Ki, Do-Hyung, Lee, Hye Jung, Moon, JungHa, Lee, SeungSeob, Kim, JaeHee, Hong, Jang Hee, Sunwoo, Jung, Jung, Jin-Gyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440778
http://dx.doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e7
_version_ 1785070708430209024
author Seo, Yu-Bin
Kim, Jae Hoon
Song, Ji Hye
Jung, WonTae
Nam, Kyu-Yeol
Kim, Nyung
Choi, Youn-Woong
Cho, SangMin
Ki, Do-Hyung
Lee, Hye Jung
Moon, JungHa
Lee, SeungSeob
Kim, JaeHee
Hong, Jang Hee
Sunwoo, Jung
Jung, Jin-Gyu
author_facet Seo, Yu-Bin
Kim, Jae Hoon
Song, Ji Hye
Jung, WonTae
Nam, Kyu-Yeol
Kim, Nyung
Choi, Youn-Woong
Cho, SangMin
Ki, Do-Hyung
Lee, Hye Jung
Moon, JungHa
Lee, SeungSeob
Kim, JaeHee
Hong, Jang Hee
Sunwoo, Jung
Jung, Jin-Gyu
author_sort Seo, Yu-Bin
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of 2 fenofibric acid formulations under fasting and fed conditions. The reference was a 135 mg capsule, while the test was a 110 mg enteric-coated tablet. This randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover phase 1 clinical trial was conducted in healthy Korean men. Sixty participants were enrolled in each of the fasting and feeding groups. Blood samples were collected 72 hours after drug administration. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin(®). A total of 53 and 51 participants from the fasting and feeding groups, respectively, completed the study. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence intervals of the maximum concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-time curve to the last measurable plasma concentration were 0.9195 (0.8795–0.9614) and 0.8630 (0.8472–0.8791) in the fasting study and 1.0926 (1.0102–1.1818) and 0.9998 (0.9675–1.0332) in the fed study, respectively. The time to reach C(max) of the enteric-coated tablet compared to that of the capsule was extended by 1 and 3 hours under fasting and fed conditions, respectively. In conclusion, enteric-coated tablets have a higher bioavailability than capsules. In addition, the enteric-coated tablet was smaller than the capsule, making it easier for patients to swallow. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007177, KCT0003304
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10333648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103336482023-07-12 Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers Seo, Yu-Bin Kim, Jae Hoon Song, Ji Hye Jung, WonTae Nam, Kyu-Yeol Kim, Nyung Choi, Youn-Woong Cho, SangMin Ki, Do-Hyung Lee, Hye Jung Moon, JungHa Lee, SeungSeob Kim, JaeHee Hong, Jang Hee Sunwoo, Jung Jung, Jin-Gyu Transl Clin Pharmacol Original Article This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of 2 fenofibric acid formulations under fasting and fed conditions. The reference was a 135 mg capsule, while the test was a 110 mg enteric-coated tablet. This randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover phase 1 clinical trial was conducted in healthy Korean men. Sixty participants were enrolled in each of the fasting and feeding groups. Blood samples were collected 72 hours after drug administration. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin(®). A total of 53 and 51 participants from the fasting and feeding groups, respectively, completed the study. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence intervals of the maximum concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-time curve to the last measurable plasma concentration were 0.9195 (0.8795–0.9614) and 0.8630 (0.8472–0.8791) in the fasting study and 1.0926 (1.0102–1.1818) and 0.9998 (0.9675–1.0332) in the fed study, respectively. The time to reach C(max) of the enteric-coated tablet compared to that of the capsule was extended by 1 and 3 hours under fasting and fed conditions, respectively. In conclusion, enteric-coated tablets have a higher bioavailability than capsules. In addition, the enteric-coated tablet was smaller than the capsule, making it easier for patients to swallow. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007177, KCT0003304 Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2023-06 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10333648/ /pubmed/37440778 http://dx.doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e7 Text en Copyright © 2023 Translational and Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/It is identical to the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Seo, Yu-Bin
Kim, Jae Hoon
Song, Ji Hye
Jung, WonTae
Nam, Kyu-Yeol
Kim, Nyung
Choi, Youn-Woong
Cho, SangMin
Ki, Do-Hyung
Lee, Hye Jung
Moon, JungHa
Lee, SeungSeob
Kim, JaeHee
Hong, Jang Hee
Sunwoo, Jung
Jung, Jin-Gyu
Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers
title Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers
title_full Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers
title_fullStr Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers
title_short Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers
title_sort safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440778
http://dx.doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e7
work_keys_str_mv AT seoyubin safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers
AT kimjaehoon safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers
AT songjihye safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers
AT jungwontae safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers
AT namkyuyeol safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers
AT kimnyung safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers
AT choiyounwoong safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers
AT chosangmin safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers
AT kidohyung safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers
AT leehyejung safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers
AT moonjungha safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers
AT leeseungseob safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers
AT kimjaehee safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers
AT hongjanghee safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers
AT sunwoojung safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers
AT jungjingyu safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers