Cargando…
Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers
This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of 2 fenofibric acid formulations under fasting and fed conditions. The reference was a 135 mg capsule, while the test was a 110 mg enteric-coated tablet. This randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover phase 1...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440778 http://dx.doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e7 |
_version_ | 1785070708430209024 |
---|---|
author | Seo, Yu-Bin Kim, Jae Hoon Song, Ji Hye Jung, WonTae Nam, Kyu-Yeol Kim, Nyung Choi, Youn-Woong Cho, SangMin Ki, Do-Hyung Lee, Hye Jung Moon, JungHa Lee, SeungSeob Kim, JaeHee Hong, Jang Hee Sunwoo, Jung Jung, Jin-Gyu |
author_facet | Seo, Yu-Bin Kim, Jae Hoon Song, Ji Hye Jung, WonTae Nam, Kyu-Yeol Kim, Nyung Choi, Youn-Woong Cho, SangMin Ki, Do-Hyung Lee, Hye Jung Moon, JungHa Lee, SeungSeob Kim, JaeHee Hong, Jang Hee Sunwoo, Jung Jung, Jin-Gyu |
author_sort | Seo, Yu-Bin |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of 2 fenofibric acid formulations under fasting and fed conditions. The reference was a 135 mg capsule, while the test was a 110 mg enteric-coated tablet. This randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover phase 1 clinical trial was conducted in healthy Korean men. Sixty participants were enrolled in each of the fasting and feeding groups. Blood samples were collected 72 hours after drug administration. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin(®). A total of 53 and 51 participants from the fasting and feeding groups, respectively, completed the study. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence intervals of the maximum concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-time curve to the last measurable plasma concentration were 0.9195 (0.8795–0.9614) and 0.8630 (0.8472–0.8791) in the fasting study and 1.0926 (1.0102–1.1818) and 0.9998 (0.9675–1.0332) in the fed study, respectively. The time to reach C(max) of the enteric-coated tablet compared to that of the capsule was extended by 1 and 3 hours under fasting and fed conditions, respectively. In conclusion, enteric-coated tablets have a higher bioavailability than capsules. In addition, the enteric-coated tablet was smaller than the capsule, making it easier for patients to swallow. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007177, KCT0003304 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10333648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103336482023-07-12 Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers Seo, Yu-Bin Kim, Jae Hoon Song, Ji Hye Jung, WonTae Nam, Kyu-Yeol Kim, Nyung Choi, Youn-Woong Cho, SangMin Ki, Do-Hyung Lee, Hye Jung Moon, JungHa Lee, SeungSeob Kim, JaeHee Hong, Jang Hee Sunwoo, Jung Jung, Jin-Gyu Transl Clin Pharmacol Original Article This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of 2 fenofibric acid formulations under fasting and fed conditions. The reference was a 135 mg capsule, while the test was a 110 mg enteric-coated tablet. This randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover phase 1 clinical trial was conducted in healthy Korean men. Sixty participants were enrolled in each of the fasting and feeding groups. Blood samples were collected 72 hours after drug administration. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin(®). A total of 53 and 51 participants from the fasting and feeding groups, respectively, completed the study. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence intervals of the maximum concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-time curve to the last measurable plasma concentration were 0.9195 (0.8795–0.9614) and 0.8630 (0.8472–0.8791) in the fasting study and 1.0926 (1.0102–1.1818) and 0.9998 (0.9675–1.0332) in the fed study, respectively. The time to reach C(max) of the enteric-coated tablet compared to that of the capsule was extended by 1 and 3 hours under fasting and fed conditions, respectively. In conclusion, enteric-coated tablets have a higher bioavailability than capsules. In addition, the enteric-coated tablet was smaller than the capsule, making it easier for patients to swallow. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007177, KCT0003304 Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2023-06 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10333648/ /pubmed/37440778 http://dx.doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e7 Text en Copyright © 2023 Translational and Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/It is identical to the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Seo, Yu-Bin Kim, Jae Hoon Song, Ji Hye Jung, WonTae Nam, Kyu-Yeol Kim, Nyung Choi, Youn-Woong Cho, SangMin Ki, Do-Hyung Lee, Hye Jung Moon, JungHa Lee, SeungSeob Kim, JaeHee Hong, Jang Hee Sunwoo, Jung Jung, Jin-Gyu Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers |
title | Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers |
title_full | Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers |
title_fullStr | Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers |
title_short | Safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers |
title_sort | safety and pharmacokinetic comparison between fenofibric acid 135 mg capsule and 110 mg enteric-coated tablet in healthy volunteers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440778 http://dx.doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seoyubin safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers AT kimjaehoon safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers AT songjihye safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers AT jungwontae safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers AT namkyuyeol safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers AT kimnyung safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers AT choiyounwoong safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers AT chosangmin safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers AT kidohyung safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers AT leehyejung safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers AT moonjungha safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers AT leeseungseob safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers AT kimjaehee safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers AT hongjanghee safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers AT sunwoojung safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers AT jungjingyu safetyandpharmacokineticcomparisonbetweenfenofibricacid135mgcapsuleand110mgentericcoatedtabletinhealthyvolunteers |