Cargando…
Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome
INTRODUCTION: Despite the considerable progress made in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), the implantation rate of transferred embryos remains low and in many cases, the reasons for failure remain unclear. We aimed to determine the potential impact of female and male partners’ reproductive t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37221898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14598 |
_version_ | 1785070709878292480 |
---|---|
author | Koort, Kairi Sõsa, Kristiina Türk, Silver Lapp, Eleri Talving, Elle Karits, Peeter Rosenstein, Karin Jaagura, Madis Sekavin, Aire Sõritsa, Deniss Haldre, Kai Karro, Helle Korrovits, Paul Salumets, Andres Mändar, Reet |
author_facet | Koort, Kairi Sõsa, Kristiina Türk, Silver Lapp, Eleri Talving, Elle Karits, Peeter Rosenstein, Karin Jaagura, Madis Sekavin, Aire Sõritsa, Deniss Haldre, Kai Karro, Helle Korrovits, Paul Salumets, Andres Mändar, Reet |
author_sort | Koort, Kairi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite the considerable progress made in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), the implantation rate of transferred embryos remains low and in many cases, the reasons for failure remain unclear. We aimed to determine the potential impact of female and male partners’ reproductive tract microbiome composition on ART outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The ART couples (n = 97) and healthy couples (n = 12) were recruited into the study. The smaller healthy group underwent a careful selection according to their reproductive and general health criteria. Both vaginal and semen samples were subjected to 16S rDNA sequencing to reveal the bacterial diversity and identify distinct microbial community types. ETHICS STATEMENT: The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee on Human Research of Tartu University, Tartu, Estonia (protocol no. 193/T‐16) on 31 May 2010. Participation in the research was voluntary. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. RESULTS: The men with Acinetobacter‐associated community who had children in the past, had the highest ART success rate (P < 0.05). The women with bacterial vaginosis vaginal microbiome community and with L. iners‐predominant and L. gasseri‐predominant microbiome had a lower ART success rate than women with the L. crispatus‐predominant or the mixed lactic‐acid‐bacteria‐predominant type (P < 0.05). The 15 couples where both partners had beneficial microbiome types had a superior ART success rate of 53%, when compared with the rest of the couples (25%; P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Microbiome disturbances in the genital tract of both partners tend to be associated with couple's infertility as well as lower ART success levels and may thus need attention before the ART procedure. The incorporation of genitourinary microbial screening as a part of the diagnostic evaluation process may become routine for ART patients if our results are confirmed by other studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10333654 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103336542023-07-12 Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome Koort, Kairi Sõsa, Kristiina Türk, Silver Lapp, Eleri Talving, Elle Karits, Peeter Rosenstein, Karin Jaagura, Madis Sekavin, Aire Sõritsa, Deniss Haldre, Kai Karro, Helle Korrovits, Paul Salumets, Andres Mändar, Reet Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Fertility INTRODUCTION: Despite the considerable progress made in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), the implantation rate of transferred embryos remains low and in many cases, the reasons for failure remain unclear. We aimed to determine the potential impact of female and male partners’ reproductive tract microbiome composition on ART outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The ART couples (n = 97) and healthy couples (n = 12) were recruited into the study. The smaller healthy group underwent a careful selection according to their reproductive and general health criteria. Both vaginal and semen samples were subjected to 16S rDNA sequencing to reveal the bacterial diversity and identify distinct microbial community types. ETHICS STATEMENT: The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee on Human Research of Tartu University, Tartu, Estonia (protocol no. 193/T‐16) on 31 May 2010. Participation in the research was voluntary. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. RESULTS: The men with Acinetobacter‐associated community who had children in the past, had the highest ART success rate (P < 0.05). The women with bacterial vaginosis vaginal microbiome community and with L. iners‐predominant and L. gasseri‐predominant microbiome had a lower ART success rate than women with the L. crispatus‐predominant or the mixed lactic‐acid‐bacteria‐predominant type (P < 0.05). The 15 couples where both partners had beneficial microbiome types had a superior ART success rate of 53%, when compared with the rest of the couples (25%; P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Microbiome disturbances in the genital tract of both partners tend to be associated with couple's infertility as well as lower ART success levels and may thus need attention before the ART procedure. The incorporation of genitourinary microbial screening as a part of the diagnostic evaluation process may become routine for ART patients if our results are confirmed by other studies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10333654/ /pubmed/37221898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14598 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Fertility Koort, Kairi Sõsa, Kristiina Türk, Silver Lapp, Eleri Talving, Elle Karits, Peeter Rosenstein, Karin Jaagura, Madis Sekavin, Aire Sõritsa, Deniss Haldre, Kai Karro, Helle Korrovits, Paul Salumets, Andres Mändar, Reet Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome |
title |
Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome |
title_full |
Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome |
title_fullStr |
Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome |
title_full_unstemmed |
Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome |
title_short |
Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome |
title_sort | lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial art outcome |
topic | Fertility |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37221898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14598 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koortkairi lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome AT sosakristiina lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome AT turksilver lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome AT lappeleri lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome AT talvingelle lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome AT karitspeeter lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome AT rosensteinkarin lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome AT jaaguramadis lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome AT sekavinaire lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome AT soritsadeniss lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome AT haldrekai lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome AT karrohelle lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome AT korrovitspaul lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome AT salumetsandres lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome AT mandarreet lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome |