Cargando…

Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome

INTRODUCTION: Despite the considerable progress made in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), the implantation rate of transferred embryos remains low and in many cases, the reasons for failure remain unclear. We aimed to determine the potential impact of female and male partners’ reproductive t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koort, Kairi, Sõsa, Kristiina, Türk, Silver, Lapp, Eleri, Talving, Elle, Karits, Peeter, Rosenstein, Karin, Jaagura, Madis, Sekavin, Aire, Sõritsa, Deniss, Haldre, Kai, Karro, Helle, Korrovits, Paul, Salumets, Andres, Mändar, Reet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37221898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14598
_version_ 1785070709878292480
author Koort, Kairi
Sõsa, Kristiina
Türk, Silver
Lapp, Eleri
Talving, Elle
Karits, Peeter
Rosenstein, Karin
Jaagura, Madis
Sekavin, Aire
Sõritsa, Deniss
Haldre, Kai
Karro, Helle
Korrovits, Paul
Salumets, Andres
Mändar, Reet
author_facet Koort, Kairi
Sõsa, Kristiina
Türk, Silver
Lapp, Eleri
Talving, Elle
Karits, Peeter
Rosenstein, Karin
Jaagura, Madis
Sekavin, Aire
Sõritsa, Deniss
Haldre, Kai
Karro, Helle
Korrovits, Paul
Salumets, Andres
Mändar, Reet
author_sort Koort, Kairi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite the considerable progress made in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), the implantation rate of transferred embryos remains low and in many cases, the reasons for failure remain unclear. We aimed to determine the potential impact of female and male partners’ reproductive tract microbiome composition on ART outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The ART couples (n = 97) and healthy couples (n = 12) were recruited into the study. The smaller healthy group underwent a careful selection according to their reproductive and general health criteria. Both vaginal and semen samples were subjected to 16S rDNA sequencing to reveal the bacterial diversity and identify distinct microbial community types. ETHICS STATEMENT: The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee on Human Research of Tartu University, Tartu, Estonia (protocol no. 193/T‐16) on 31 May 2010. Participation in the research was voluntary. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. RESULTS: The men with Acinetobacter‐associated community who had children in the past, had the highest ART success rate (P < 0.05). The women with bacterial vaginosis vaginal microbiome community and with L. iners‐predominant and L. gasseri‐predominant microbiome had a lower ART success rate than women with the L. crispatus‐predominant or the mixed lactic‐acid‐bacteria‐predominant type (P < 0.05). The 15 couples where both partners had beneficial microbiome types had a superior ART success rate of 53%, when compared with the rest of the couples (25%; P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Microbiome disturbances in the genital tract of both partners tend to be associated with couple's infertility as well as lower ART success levels and may thus need attention before the ART procedure. The incorporation of genitourinary microbial screening as a part of the diagnostic evaluation process may become routine for ART patients if our results are confirmed by other studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10333654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103336542023-07-12 Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome Koort, Kairi Sõsa, Kristiina Türk, Silver Lapp, Eleri Talving, Elle Karits, Peeter Rosenstein, Karin Jaagura, Madis Sekavin, Aire Sõritsa, Deniss Haldre, Kai Karro, Helle Korrovits, Paul Salumets, Andres Mändar, Reet Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Fertility INTRODUCTION: Despite the considerable progress made in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), the implantation rate of transferred embryos remains low and in many cases, the reasons for failure remain unclear. We aimed to determine the potential impact of female and male partners’ reproductive tract microbiome composition on ART outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The ART couples (n = 97) and healthy couples (n = 12) were recruited into the study. The smaller healthy group underwent a careful selection according to their reproductive and general health criteria. Both vaginal and semen samples were subjected to 16S rDNA sequencing to reveal the bacterial diversity and identify distinct microbial community types. ETHICS STATEMENT: The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee on Human Research of Tartu University, Tartu, Estonia (protocol no. 193/T‐16) on 31 May 2010. Participation in the research was voluntary. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. RESULTS: The men with Acinetobacter‐associated community who had children in the past, had the highest ART success rate (P < 0.05). The women with bacterial vaginosis vaginal microbiome community and with L. iners‐predominant and L. gasseri‐predominant microbiome had a lower ART success rate than women with the L. crispatus‐predominant or the mixed lactic‐acid‐bacteria‐predominant type (P < 0.05). The 15 couples where both partners had beneficial microbiome types had a superior ART success rate of 53%, when compared with the rest of the couples (25%; P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Microbiome disturbances in the genital tract of both partners tend to be associated with couple's infertility as well as lower ART success levels and may thus need attention before the ART procedure. The incorporation of genitourinary microbial screening as a part of the diagnostic evaluation process may become routine for ART patients if our results are confirmed by other studies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10333654/ /pubmed/37221898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14598 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Fertility
Koort, Kairi
Sõsa, Kristiina
Türk, Silver
Lapp, Eleri
Talving, Elle
Karits, Peeter
Rosenstein, Karin
Jaagura, Madis
Sekavin, Aire
Sõritsa, Deniss
Haldre, Kai
Karro, Helle
Korrovits, Paul
Salumets, Andres
Mändar, Reet
Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome
title Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome
title_full Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome
title_fullStr Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome
title_full_unstemmed Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome
title_short Lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome
title_sort lactobacillus crispatus‐dominated vaginal microbiome and acinetobacter‐dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial art outcome
topic Fertility
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37221898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14598
work_keys_str_mv AT koortkairi lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome
AT sosakristiina lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome
AT turksilver lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome
AT lappeleri lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome
AT talvingelle lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome
AT karitspeeter lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome
AT rosensteinkarin lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome
AT jaaguramadis lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome
AT sekavinaire lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome
AT soritsadeniss lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome
AT haldrekai lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome
AT karrohelle lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome
AT korrovitspaul lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome
AT salumetsandres lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome
AT mandarreet lactobacilluscrispatusdominatedvaginalmicrobiomeandacinetobacterdominatedseminalmicrobiomesupportbeneficialartoutcome