Cargando…

The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis

INTRODUCTION: This study examined obstetric outcomes in patients diagnosed with uterine adenomyosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This historical cohort study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. The study population was all hospital deliveries in women aged...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mandelbaum, Rachel S., Melville, Samuel J. F., Violette, Caroline J., Guner, Joie Z., Doody, Kaitlin A., Matsuzaki, Shinya, Quinn, Molly M., Ouzounian, Joseph G., Paulson, Richard J., Matsuo, Koji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37087741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14581
_version_ 1785070710119464960
author Mandelbaum, Rachel S.
Melville, Samuel J. F.
Violette, Caroline J.
Guner, Joie Z.
Doody, Kaitlin A.
Matsuzaki, Shinya
Quinn, Molly M.
Ouzounian, Joseph G.
Paulson, Richard J.
Matsuo, Koji
author_facet Mandelbaum, Rachel S.
Melville, Samuel J. F.
Violette, Caroline J.
Guner, Joie Z.
Doody, Kaitlin A.
Matsuzaki, Shinya
Quinn, Molly M.
Ouzounian, Joseph G.
Paulson, Richard J.
Matsuo, Koji
author_sort Mandelbaum, Rachel S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study examined obstetric outcomes in patients diagnosed with uterine adenomyosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This historical cohort study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. The study population was all hospital deliveries in women aged 15–54 years between January 2016 and December 2019. The exposure was a diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. The main outcome measures were obstetric characteristics, including placenta previa, placenta accreta spectrum, and placental abruption. Secondary outcomes were delivery complications including severe maternal morbidity. Analytic steps to assess these outcomes included (i) a 1‐to‐N propensity score matching to mitigate and balance prepregnancy confounders to assess obstetric characteristics, followed by (ii) an adjusting model with preselected pregnancy and delivery factors to assess maternal morbidity. Sensitivity analyses were also performed with restricted cohorts to account for prior uterine scar, uterine myoma, and extra‐uterine endometriosis. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 5430 patients with adenomyosis were compared to 21 720 patients without adenomyosis. Adenomyosis was associated with an increased odds of placenta accreta spectrum (adjusted‐odds ratio [aOR] 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01–4.70), placenta abruption (aOR 3.21, 95% CI: 2.60–3.98), and placenta previa (aOR 5.08, 95% CI: 4.25–6.06). Delivery at <32 weeks of gestation (aOR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.24–1.77) and cesarean delivery (aOR 7.72, 95% CI: 7.04–8.47) were both increased in women with adenomyosis. Patients in the adenomyosis group were more likely to experience severe maternal morbidity at delivery compared to those in the nonadenomyosis group (aOR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.59–2.16). Results remained robust in the aforementioned several sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This national‐level analysis suggests that a diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis is associated with an increased risk of placental pathology (placenta accreta spectrum, placenta abruption, and placental previa) and adverse maternal outcomes at delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10333655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103336552023-07-12 The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis Mandelbaum, Rachel S. Melville, Samuel J. F. Violette, Caroline J. Guner, Joie Z. Doody, Kaitlin A. Matsuzaki, Shinya Quinn, Molly M. Ouzounian, Joseph G. Paulson, Richard J. Matsuo, Koji Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Pregnancy INTRODUCTION: This study examined obstetric outcomes in patients diagnosed with uterine adenomyosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This historical cohort study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. The study population was all hospital deliveries in women aged 15–54 years between January 2016 and December 2019. The exposure was a diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. The main outcome measures were obstetric characteristics, including placenta previa, placenta accreta spectrum, and placental abruption. Secondary outcomes were delivery complications including severe maternal morbidity. Analytic steps to assess these outcomes included (i) a 1‐to‐N propensity score matching to mitigate and balance prepregnancy confounders to assess obstetric characteristics, followed by (ii) an adjusting model with preselected pregnancy and delivery factors to assess maternal morbidity. Sensitivity analyses were also performed with restricted cohorts to account for prior uterine scar, uterine myoma, and extra‐uterine endometriosis. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 5430 patients with adenomyosis were compared to 21 720 patients without adenomyosis. Adenomyosis was associated with an increased odds of placenta accreta spectrum (adjusted‐odds ratio [aOR] 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01–4.70), placenta abruption (aOR 3.21, 95% CI: 2.60–3.98), and placenta previa (aOR 5.08, 95% CI: 4.25–6.06). Delivery at <32 weeks of gestation (aOR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.24–1.77) and cesarean delivery (aOR 7.72, 95% CI: 7.04–8.47) were both increased in women with adenomyosis. Patients in the adenomyosis group were more likely to experience severe maternal morbidity at delivery compared to those in the nonadenomyosis group (aOR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.59–2.16). Results remained robust in the aforementioned several sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This national‐level analysis suggests that a diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis is associated with an increased risk of placental pathology (placenta accreta spectrum, placenta abruption, and placental previa) and adverse maternal outcomes at delivery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10333655/ /pubmed/37087741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14581 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Pregnancy
Mandelbaum, Rachel S.
Melville, Samuel J. F.
Violette, Caroline J.
Guner, Joie Z.
Doody, Kaitlin A.
Matsuzaki, Shinya
Quinn, Molly M.
Ouzounian, Joseph G.
Paulson, Richard J.
Matsuo, Koji
The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis
title The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis
title_full The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis
title_fullStr The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis
title_short The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis
title_sort association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: a propensity score‐matched analysis
topic Pregnancy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37087741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14581
work_keys_str_mv AT mandelbaumrachels theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT melvillesamueljf theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT violettecarolinej theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT gunerjoiez theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT doodykaitlina theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT matsuzakishinya theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT quinnmollym theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT ouzounianjosephg theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT paulsonrichardj theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT matsuokoji theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT mandelbaumrachels associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT melvillesamueljf associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT violettecarolinej associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT gunerjoiez associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT doodykaitlina associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT matsuzakishinya associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT quinnmollym associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT ouzounianjosephg associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT paulsonrichardj associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT matsuokoji associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis