Cargando…
The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis
INTRODUCTION: This study examined obstetric outcomes in patients diagnosed with uterine adenomyosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This historical cohort study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. The study population was all hospital deliveries in women aged...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37087741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14581 |
_version_ | 1785070710119464960 |
---|---|
author | Mandelbaum, Rachel S. Melville, Samuel J. F. Violette, Caroline J. Guner, Joie Z. Doody, Kaitlin A. Matsuzaki, Shinya Quinn, Molly M. Ouzounian, Joseph G. Paulson, Richard J. Matsuo, Koji |
author_facet | Mandelbaum, Rachel S. Melville, Samuel J. F. Violette, Caroline J. Guner, Joie Z. Doody, Kaitlin A. Matsuzaki, Shinya Quinn, Molly M. Ouzounian, Joseph G. Paulson, Richard J. Matsuo, Koji |
author_sort | Mandelbaum, Rachel S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This study examined obstetric outcomes in patients diagnosed with uterine adenomyosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This historical cohort study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. The study population was all hospital deliveries in women aged 15–54 years between January 2016 and December 2019. The exposure was a diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. The main outcome measures were obstetric characteristics, including placenta previa, placenta accreta spectrum, and placental abruption. Secondary outcomes were delivery complications including severe maternal morbidity. Analytic steps to assess these outcomes included (i) a 1‐to‐N propensity score matching to mitigate and balance prepregnancy confounders to assess obstetric characteristics, followed by (ii) an adjusting model with preselected pregnancy and delivery factors to assess maternal morbidity. Sensitivity analyses were also performed with restricted cohorts to account for prior uterine scar, uterine myoma, and extra‐uterine endometriosis. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 5430 patients with adenomyosis were compared to 21 720 patients without adenomyosis. Adenomyosis was associated with an increased odds of placenta accreta spectrum (adjusted‐odds ratio [aOR] 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01–4.70), placenta abruption (aOR 3.21, 95% CI: 2.60–3.98), and placenta previa (aOR 5.08, 95% CI: 4.25–6.06). Delivery at <32 weeks of gestation (aOR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.24–1.77) and cesarean delivery (aOR 7.72, 95% CI: 7.04–8.47) were both increased in women with adenomyosis. Patients in the adenomyosis group were more likely to experience severe maternal morbidity at delivery compared to those in the nonadenomyosis group (aOR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.59–2.16). Results remained robust in the aforementioned several sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This national‐level analysis suggests that a diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis is associated with an increased risk of placental pathology (placenta accreta spectrum, placenta abruption, and placental previa) and adverse maternal outcomes at delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10333655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103336552023-07-12 The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis Mandelbaum, Rachel S. Melville, Samuel J. F. Violette, Caroline J. Guner, Joie Z. Doody, Kaitlin A. Matsuzaki, Shinya Quinn, Molly M. Ouzounian, Joseph G. Paulson, Richard J. Matsuo, Koji Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Pregnancy INTRODUCTION: This study examined obstetric outcomes in patients diagnosed with uterine adenomyosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This historical cohort study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. The study population was all hospital deliveries in women aged 15–54 years between January 2016 and December 2019. The exposure was a diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. The main outcome measures were obstetric characteristics, including placenta previa, placenta accreta spectrum, and placental abruption. Secondary outcomes were delivery complications including severe maternal morbidity. Analytic steps to assess these outcomes included (i) a 1‐to‐N propensity score matching to mitigate and balance prepregnancy confounders to assess obstetric characteristics, followed by (ii) an adjusting model with preselected pregnancy and delivery factors to assess maternal morbidity. Sensitivity analyses were also performed with restricted cohorts to account for prior uterine scar, uterine myoma, and extra‐uterine endometriosis. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 5430 patients with adenomyosis were compared to 21 720 patients without adenomyosis. Adenomyosis was associated with an increased odds of placenta accreta spectrum (adjusted‐odds ratio [aOR] 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01–4.70), placenta abruption (aOR 3.21, 95% CI: 2.60–3.98), and placenta previa (aOR 5.08, 95% CI: 4.25–6.06). Delivery at <32 weeks of gestation (aOR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.24–1.77) and cesarean delivery (aOR 7.72, 95% CI: 7.04–8.47) were both increased in women with adenomyosis. Patients in the adenomyosis group were more likely to experience severe maternal morbidity at delivery compared to those in the nonadenomyosis group (aOR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.59–2.16). Results remained robust in the aforementioned several sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This national‐level analysis suggests that a diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis is associated with an increased risk of placental pathology (placenta accreta spectrum, placenta abruption, and placental previa) and adverse maternal outcomes at delivery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10333655/ /pubmed/37087741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14581 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Pregnancy Mandelbaum, Rachel S. Melville, Samuel J. F. Violette, Caroline J. Guner, Joie Z. Doody, Kaitlin A. Matsuzaki, Shinya Quinn, Molly M. Ouzounian, Joseph G. Paulson, Richard J. Matsuo, Koji The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis |
title | The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis |
title_full | The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis |
title_fullStr | The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis |
title_short | The association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: A propensity score‐matched analysis |
title_sort | association between uterine adenomyosis and adverse obstetric outcomes: a propensity score‐matched analysis |
topic | Pregnancy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37087741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mandelbaumrachels theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT melvillesamueljf theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT violettecarolinej theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT gunerjoiez theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT doodykaitlina theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT matsuzakishinya theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT quinnmollym theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT ouzounianjosephg theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT paulsonrichardj theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT matsuokoji theassociationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT mandelbaumrachels associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT melvillesamueljf associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT violettecarolinej associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT gunerjoiez associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT doodykaitlina associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT matsuzakishinya associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT quinnmollym associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT ouzounianjosephg associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT paulsonrichardj associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT matsuokoji associationbetweenuterineadenomyosisandadverseobstetricoutcomesapropensityscorematchedanalysis |