Cargando…
Surface and subsurface oceanographic features drive forage fish distributions and aggregations: Implications for prey availability to top predators in the US Northeast Shelf ecosystem
Forage fishes are a critical food web link in marine ecosystems, aggregating in a hierarchical patch structure over multiple spatial and temporal scales. Surface‐level forage fish aggregations (FFAs) represent a concentrated source of prey available to surface‐ and shallow‐foraging marine predators....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10226 |
_version_ | 1785070799831433216 |
---|---|
author | Goetsch, Chandra Gulka, Julia Friedland, Kevin D. Winship, Arliss J. Clerc, Jeff Gilbert, Andrew Goyert, Holly F. Stenhouse, Iain J. Williams, Kathryn A. Willmott, Julia R. Rekdahl, Melinda L. Rosenbaum, Howard C. Adams, Evan M. |
author_facet | Goetsch, Chandra Gulka, Julia Friedland, Kevin D. Winship, Arliss J. Clerc, Jeff Gilbert, Andrew Goyert, Holly F. Stenhouse, Iain J. Williams, Kathryn A. Willmott, Julia R. Rekdahl, Melinda L. Rosenbaum, Howard C. Adams, Evan M. |
author_sort | Goetsch, Chandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Forage fishes are a critical food web link in marine ecosystems, aggregating in a hierarchical patch structure over multiple spatial and temporal scales. Surface‐level forage fish aggregations (FFAs) represent a concentrated source of prey available to surface‐ and shallow‐foraging marine predators. Existing survey and analysis methods are often imperfect for studying forage fishes at scales appropriate to foraging predators, making it difficult to quantify predator–prey interactions. In many cases, general distributions of forage fish species are known; however, these may not represent surface‐level prey availability to predators. Likewise, we lack an understanding of the oceanographic drivers of spatial patterns of prey aggregation and availability or forage fish community patterns. Specifically, we applied Bayesian joint species distribution models to bottom trawl survey data to assess species‐ and community‐level forage fish distribution patterns across the US Northeast Continental Shelf (NES) ecosystem. Aerial digital surveys gathered data on surface FFAs at two project sites within the NES, which we used in a spatially explicit hierarchical Bayesian model to estimate the abundance and size of surface FFAs. We used these models to examine the oceanographic drivers of forage fish distributions and aggregations. Our results suggest that, in the NES, regions of high community species richness are spatially consistent with regions of high surface FFA abundance. Bathymetric depth drove both patterns, while subsurface features, such as mixed layer depth, primarily influenced aggregation behavior and surface features, such as sea surface temperature, sub‐mesoscale eddies, and fronts influenced forage fish diversity. In combination, these models help quantify the availability of forage fishes to marine predators and represent a novel application of spatial models to aerial digital survey data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10334121 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103341212023-07-12 Surface and subsurface oceanographic features drive forage fish distributions and aggregations: Implications for prey availability to top predators in the US Northeast Shelf ecosystem Goetsch, Chandra Gulka, Julia Friedland, Kevin D. Winship, Arliss J. Clerc, Jeff Gilbert, Andrew Goyert, Holly F. Stenhouse, Iain J. Williams, Kathryn A. Willmott, Julia R. Rekdahl, Melinda L. Rosenbaum, Howard C. Adams, Evan M. Ecol Evol Research Articles Forage fishes are a critical food web link in marine ecosystems, aggregating in a hierarchical patch structure over multiple spatial and temporal scales. Surface‐level forage fish aggregations (FFAs) represent a concentrated source of prey available to surface‐ and shallow‐foraging marine predators. Existing survey and analysis methods are often imperfect for studying forage fishes at scales appropriate to foraging predators, making it difficult to quantify predator–prey interactions. In many cases, general distributions of forage fish species are known; however, these may not represent surface‐level prey availability to predators. Likewise, we lack an understanding of the oceanographic drivers of spatial patterns of prey aggregation and availability or forage fish community patterns. Specifically, we applied Bayesian joint species distribution models to bottom trawl survey data to assess species‐ and community‐level forage fish distribution patterns across the US Northeast Continental Shelf (NES) ecosystem. Aerial digital surveys gathered data on surface FFAs at two project sites within the NES, which we used in a spatially explicit hierarchical Bayesian model to estimate the abundance and size of surface FFAs. We used these models to examine the oceanographic drivers of forage fish distributions and aggregations. Our results suggest that, in the NES, regions of high community species richness are spatially consistent with regions of high surface FFA abundance. Bathymetric depth drove both patterns, while subsurface features, such as mixed layer depth, primarily influenced aggregation behavior and surface features, such as sea surface temperature, sub‐mesoscale eddies, and fronts influenced forage fish diversity. In combination, these models help quantify the availability of forage fishes to marine predators and represent a novel application of spatial models to aerial digital survey data. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10334121/ /pubmed/37441097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10226 Text en © 2023 Biodiversity Research Institure. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Goetsch, Chandra Gulka, Julia Friedland, Kevin D. Winship, Arliss J. Clerc, Jeff Gilbert, Andrew Goyert, Holly F. Stenhouse, Iain J. Williams, Kathryn A. Willmott, Julia R. Rekdahl, Melinda L. Rosenbaum, Howard C. Adams, Evan M. Surface and subsurface oceanographic features drive forage fish distributions and aggregations: Implications for prey availability to top predators in the US Northeast Shelf ecosystem |
title | Surface and subsurface oceanographic features drive forage fish distributions and aggregations: Implications for prey availability to top predators in the US Northeast Shelf ecosystem |
title_full | Surface and subsurface oceanographic features drive forage fish distributions and aggregations: Implications for prey availability to top predators in the US Northeast Shelf ecosystem |
title_fullStr | Surface and subsurface oceanographic features drive forage fish distributions and aggregations: Implications for prey availability to top predators in the US Northeast Shelf ecosystem |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface and subsurface oceanographic features drive forage fish distributions and aggregations: Implications for prey availability to top predators in the US Northeast Shelf ecosystem |
title_short | Surface and subsurface oceanographic features drive forage fish distributions and aggregations: Implications for prey availability to top predators in the US Northeast Shelf ecosystem |
title_sort | surface and subsurface oceanographic features drive forage fish distributions and aggregations: implications for prey availability to top predators in the us northeast shelf ecosystem |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goetschchandra surfaceandsubsurfaceoceanographicfeaturesdriveforagefishdistributionsandaggregationsimplicationsforpreyavailabilitytotoppredatorsintheusnortheastshelfecosystem AT gulkajulia surfaceandsubsurfaceoceanographicfeaturesdriveforagefishdistributionsandaggregationsimplicationsforpreyavailabilitytotoppredatorsintheusnortheastshelfecosystem AT friedlandkevind surfaceandsubsurfaceoceanographicfeaturesdriveforagefishdistributionsandaggregationsimplicationsforpreyavailabilitytotoppredatorsintheusnortheastshelfecosystem AT winshiparlissj surfaceandsubsurfaceoceanographicfeaturesdriveforagefishdistributionsandaggregationsimplicationsforpreyavailabilitytotoppredatorsintheusnortheastshelfecosystem AT clercjeff surfaceandsubsurfaceoceanographicfeaturesdriveforagefishdistributionsandaggregationsimplicationsforpreyavailabilitytotoppredatorsintheusnortheastshelfecosystem AT gilbertandrew surfaceandsubsurfaceoceanographicfeaturesdriveforagefishdistributionsandaggregationsimplicationsforpreyavailabilitytotoppredatorsintheusnortheastshelfecosystem AT goyerthollyf surfaceandsubsurfaceoceanographicfeaturesdriveforagefishdistributionsandaggregationsimplicationsforpreyavailabilitytotoppredatorsintheusnortheastshelfecosystem AT stenhouseiainj surfaceandsubsurfaceoceanographicfeaturesdriveforagefishdistributionsandaggregationsimplicationsforpreyavailabilitytotoppredatorsintheusnortheastshelfecosystem AT williamskathryna surfaceandsubsurfaceoceanographicfeaturesdriveforagefishdistributionsandaggregationsimplicationsforpreyavailabilitytotoppredatorsintheusnortheastshelfecosystem AT willmottjuliar surfaceandsubsurfaceoceanographicfeaturesdriveforagefishdistributionsandaggregationsimplicationsforpreyavailabilitytotoppredatorsintheusnortheastshelfecosystem AT rekdahlmelindal surfaceandsubsurfaceoceanographicfeaturesdriveforagefishdistributionsandaggregationsimplicationsforpreyavailabilitytotoppredatorsintheusnortheastshelfecosystem AT rosenbaumhowardc surfaceandsubsurfaceoceanographicfeaturesdriveforagefishdistributionsandaggregationsimplicationsforpreyavailabilitytotoppredatorsintheusnortheastshelfecosystem AT adamsevanm surfaceandsubsurfaceoceanographicfeaturesdriveforagefishdistributionsandaggregationsimplicationsforpreyavailabilitytotoppredatorsintheusnortheastshelfecosystem |