Cargando…
Comparison of Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders by Chicago Classification Versions 3.0 and 4.0
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We aim to investigate the diagnostic accuracy and differences between Chicago classification version 3.0 (CC v3.0) and 4.0 (CC v4.0). METHODS: Patients who underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) for suspected esophageal motility disorders were prospectively recruited b...
Autores principales: | Noh, Jin Hee, Jung, Kee Wook, Yoon, In Ja, Na, Hee Kyong, Ahn, Ji Yong, Lee, Jeong Hoon, Kim, Do Hoon, Choi, Kee Don, Song, Ho June, Lee, Gin Hyug, Jung, Hwoon-Yong |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37417259 http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm22121 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Predictive Role of Endoscopic Surveillance after Total Gastrectomy with R0 Resection for Gastric Cancer
por: Lee, Jung Su, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparing Patients Diagnosed With Ineffective Esophageal Motility by the Chicago Classification Version 3.0 and Version 4.0 Criteria
por: Tuan, Alyssa W., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Usefulness of EndoFLIP in Diverticular Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Symptomatic Epiphrenic Diverticulum
por: Noh, Jin Hee, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Ineffective Esophageal Motility by Chicago Classification Version 4.0 Compared to Chicago Classification Version 3.0
por: Kurin, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
What Is the Diagnostic Accuracy of Chicago Classification Version 4.0 and the Difference From Version 3.0 in Diagnosing Esophageal Motility Disorders?
por: Lee, Ju Yup
Publicado: (2023)