Cargando…

Comparative Assessment of Diet Quality and Adherence to a Structured Nutrition and Exercise Intervention Compared with Usual Care in Pregnancy in a Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND: In trials testing the efficacy of diet and exercise modifications during pregnancy on health outcomes, assessment of participant adherence to interventions of diet and exercise is rarely reported, with few standard methods existing to measure adherence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dempsey, Kendra, Mottola, Michelle F., Atkinson, Stephanie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Nutrition 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.100097
_version_ 1785070815603064832
author Dempsey, Kendra
Mottola, Michelle F.
Atkinson, Stephanie A.
author_facet Dempsey, Kendra
Mottola, Michelle F.
Atkinson, Stephanie A.
author_sort Dempsey, Kendra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In trials testing the efficacy of diet and exercise modifications during pregnancy on health outcomes, assessment of participant adherence to interventions of diet and exercise is rarely reported, with few standard methods existing to measure adherence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the maternal diet quality and create an algorithm to evaluate adherence to an intervention of high protein/dairy nutrition and walking exercise from early pregnancy to birth. METHODS: In Be Healthy in Pregnancy randomized trial (NCT01693510), diet quality was measured using scores from an adapted PrimeScreen food frequency questionnaire, nutrient intake assessed by 3-day diet records, and physical activity using accelerometry at 14–17 (early), 26–28 (middle), and 36–38 (late) weeks’ gestation. A novel adherence score was derived by combining data for compliance with prescribed protein and energy intakes and daily step counts in the intervention group. Between-group diet quality scores and changes in adherence scores in the intervention group across pregnancy were analyzed using generalized estimating equations adjusted for prepregnancy body mass index and study site. RESULTS: Diet scores were similar for intervention (n = 55) and control (n = 56) groups at baseline but only the intervention group significantly improved and maintained their scores from early to middle (18.7 ± 7.6 vs. 22.9 ± 6.1; P < 0.001) and late (22.5 ± 6.9; P < 0.008) pregnancy. Protein intake was significantly (P < 0.001) higher but energy intakes were similar in the intervention group compared with those in the control group. Adherence scores for the intervention increased significantly (P < 0.01) from early (1.52 ± 0.70) to midpregnancy (1.89 ± 0.82) but declined from midpregnancy to late (1.55 ± 0.78; P < 0.0005) pregnancy primarily owing to lower step counts. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to an intervention may decline toward the end of pregnancy, particularly in maintaining physical activity. Creation of adherence scores is a feasible approach to measure combined intervention compliance for diet and physical activity and may increase transparency in interpreting results of randomized trials in pregnancy. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01689961 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01689961?cond=NCT01689961&rank=1; registered on 21 September 2012).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10334218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Society for Nutrition
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103342182023-07-12 Comparative Assessment of Diet Quality and Adherence to a Structured Nutrition and Exercise Intervention Compared with Usual Care in Pregnancy in a Randomized Trial Dempsey, Kendra Mottola, Michelle F. Atkinson, Stephanie A. Curr Dev Nutr Original Research BACKGROUND: In trials testing the efficacy of diet and exercise modifications during pregnancy on health outcomes, assessment of participant adherence to interventions of diet and exercise is rarely reported, with few standard methods existing to measure adherence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the maternal diet quality and create an algorithm to evaluate adherence to an intervention of high protein/dairy nutrition and walking exercise from early pregnancy to birth. METHODS: In Be Healthy in Pregnancy randomized trial (NCT01693510), diet quality was measured using scores from an adapted PrimeScreen food frequency questionnaire, nutrient intake assessed by 3-day diet records, and physical activity using accelerometry at 14–17 (early), 26–28 (middle), and 36–38 (late) weeks’ gestation. A novel adherence score was derived by combining data for compliance with prescribed protein and energy intakes and daily step counts in the intervention group. Between-group diet quality scores and changes in adherence scores in the intervention group across pregnancy were analyzed using generalized estimating equations adjusted for prepregnancy body mass index and study site. RESULTS: Diet scores were similar for intervention (n = 55) and control (n = 56) groups at baseline but only the intervention group significantly improved and maintained their scores from early to middle (18.7 ± 7.6 vs. 22.9 ± 6.1; P < 0.001) and late (22.5 ± 6.9; P < 0.008) pregnancy. Protein intake was significantly (P < 0.001) higher but energy intakes were similar in the intervention group compared with those in the control group. Adherence scores for the intervention increased significantly (P < 0.01) from early (1.52 ± 0.70) to midpregnancy (1.89 ± 0.82) but declined from midpregnancy to late (1.55 ± 0.78; P < 0.0005) pregnancy primarily owing to lower step counts. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to an intervention may decline toward the end of pregnancy, particularly in maintaining physical activity. Creation of adherence scores is a feasible approach to measure combined intervention compliance for diet and physical activity and may increase transparency in interpreting results of randomized trials in pregnancy. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01689961 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01689961?cond=NCT01689961&rank=1; registered on 21 September 2012). American Society for Nutrition 2023-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10334218/ /pubmed/37441683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.100097 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Dempsey, Kendra
Mottola, Michelle F.
Atkinson, Stephanie A.
Comparative Assessment of Diet Quality and Adherence to a Structured Nutrition and Exercise Intervention Compared with Usual Care in Pregnancy in a Randomized Trial
title Comparative Assessment of Diet Quality and Adherence to a Structured Nutrition and Exercise Intervention Compared with Usual Care in Pregnancy in a Randomized Trial
title_full Comparative Assessment of Diet Quality and Adherence to a Structured Nutrition and Exercise Intervention Compared with Usual Care in Pregnancy in a Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Comparative Assessment of Diet Quality and Adherence to a Structured Nutrition and Exercise Intervention Compared with Usual Care in Pregnancy in a Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Assessment of Diet Quality and Adherence to a Structured Nutrition and Exercise Intervention Compared with Usual Care in Pregnancy in a Randomized Trial
title_short Comparative Assessment of Diet Quality and Adherence to a Structured Nutrition and Exercise Intervention Compared with Usual Care in Pregnancy in a Randomized Trial
title_sort comparative assessment of diet quality and adherence to a structured nutrition and exercise intervention compared with usual care in pregnancy in a randomized trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.100097
work_keys_str_mv AT dempseykendra comparativeassessmentofdietqualityandadherencetoastructurednutritionandexerciseinterventioncomparedwithusualcareinpregnancyinarandomizedtrial
AT mottolamichellef comparativeassessmentofdietqualityandadherencetoastructurednutritionandexerciseinterventioncomparedwithusualcareinpregnancyinarandomizedtrial
AT atkinsonstephaniea comparativeassessmentofdietqualityandadherencetoastructurednutritionandexerciseinterventioncomparedwithusualcareinpregnancyinarandomizedtrial