Cargando…
Comparison of Rotterdam and Barcelona Magnetic Resonance Imaging Risk Calculators for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based risk calculators (MRI-RCs) individualise the likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and improve candidate selection for prostate biopsy beyond the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.013 |
_version_ | 1785070819437707264 |
---|---|
author | Morote, Juan Borque-Fernando, Ángel Triquell, Marina Campistol, Miriam Servian, Pol Abascal, José M. Planas, Jacques Méndez, Olga Esteban, Luis M. Trilla, Enrique |
author_facet | Morote, Juan Borque-Fernando, Ángel Triquell, Marina Campistol, Miriam Servian, Pol Abascal, José M. Planas, Jacques Méndez, Olga Esteban, Luis M. Trilla, Enrique |
author_sort | Morote, Juan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based risk calculators (MRI-RCs) individualise the likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and improve candidate selection for prostate biopsy beyond the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the Barcelona (BCN) and Rotterdam (ROT) MRI-RCs in an entire population and according to the PI-RADS categories. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective comparison of BCN- and ROT-RC in 946 men with suspected prostate cancer in whom systematic biopsy was performed, as well as target biopsies of PI-RADS ≥3 lesions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Saved biopsies and undetected csPCa (grade group ≥2) were determined. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The csPCa detection was 40.8%. The median risks of csPCa from BCN- and ROT-RC were, respectively, 67.1% and 25% in men with csPCa, whereas 10.5% and 3% in those without csPCa (p < 0.001). The areas under the curve were 0.856 and 0.844, respectively (p = 0.116). BCN-RC showed a higher net benefit and clinical utility over ROT-RC. Using appropriate thresholds, respectively, 75% and 80% of biopsies were needed to identify 50% of csPCa detected in men with PI-RADS <3, whereas 35% and 21% of biopsies were saved, missing 10% of csPCa detected in men with PI-RADS 3. BCN-RC saved 15% of biopsies, missing 2% of csPCa in men with PI-RADS 4, whereas ROT-RC saved 10%, missing 6%. No RC saved biopsies without missing csPCa in men with PI-RADS 5. CONCLUSIONS: ROT-RC provided a lower and narrower range of csPCa probabilities than BCN-RC. BCN-RC showed a net benefit over ROT-RC in the entire population. However, BCN-RC was useful in men with PI-RADS 3 and 4, whereas ROT-RC was useful only in those with PI-RADS 3. No RC seemed to be helpful in men with negative MRI and PI-RADS 5. PATIENT SUMMARY: Barcelona risk calculator was more helpful than Rotterdam risk calculator to select candidates for prostate biopsy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10334241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103342412023-07-12 Comparison of Rotterdam and Barcelona Magnetic Resonance Imaging Risk Calculators for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Morote, Juan Borque-Fernando, Ángel Triquell, Marina Campistol, Miriam Servian, Pol Abascal, José M. Planas, Jacques Méndez, Olga Esteban, Luis M. Trilla, Enrique Eur Urol Open Sci Prostatic Disease BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based risk calculators (MRI-RCs) individualise the likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and improve candidate selection for prostate biopsy beyond the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the Barcelona (BCN) and Rotterdam (ROT) MRI-RCs in an entire population and according to the PI-RADS categories. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective comparison of BCN- and ROT-RC in 946 men with suspected prostate cancer in whom systematic biopsy was performed, as well as target biopsies of PI-RADS ≥3 lesions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Saved biopsies and undetected csPCa (grade group ≥2) were determined. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The csPCa detection was 40.8%. The median risks of csPCa from BCN- and ROT-RC were, respectively, 67.1% and 25% in men with csPCa, whereas 10.5% and 3% in those without csPCa (p < 0.001). The areas under the curve were 0.856 and 0.844, respectively (p = 0.116). BCN-RC showed a higher net benefit and clinical utility over ROT-RC. Using appropriate thresholds, respectively, 75% and 80% of biopsies were needed to identify 50% of csPCa detected in men with PI-RADS <3, whereas 35% and 21% of biopsies were saved, missing 10% of csPCa detected in men with PI-RADS 3. BCN-RC saved 15% of biopsies, missing 2% of csPCa in men with PI-RADS 4, whereas ROT-RC saved 10%, missing 6%. No RC saved biopsies without missing csPCa in men with PI-RADS 5. CONCLUSIONS: ROT-RC provided a lower and narrower range of csPCa probabilities than BCN-RC. BCN-RC showed a net benefit over ROT-RC in the entire population. However, BCN-RC was useful in men with PI-RADS 3 and 4, whereas ROT-RC was useful only in those with PI-RADS 3. No RC seemed to be helpful in men with negative MRI and PI-RADS 5. PATIENT SUMMARY: Barcelona risk calculator was more helpful than Rotterdam risk calculator to select candidates for prostate biopsy. Elsevier 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10334241/ /pubmed/37441350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.013 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Prostatic Disease Morote, Juan Borque-Fernando, Ángel Triquell, Marina Campistol, Miriam Servian, Pol Abascal, José M. Planas, Jacques Méndez, Olga Esteban, Luis M. Trilla, Enrique Comparison of Rotterdam and Barcelona Magnetic Resonance Imaging Risk Calculators for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer |
title | Comparison of Rotterdam and Barcelona Magnetic Resonance Imaging Risk Calculators for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer |
title_full | Comparison of Rotterdam and Barcelona Magnetic Resonance Imaging Risk Calculators for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Rotterdam and Barcelona Magnetic Resonance Imaging Risk Calculators for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Rotterdam and Barcelona Magnetic Resonance Imaging Risk Calculators for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer |
title_short | Comparison of Rotterdam and Barcelona Magnetic Resonance Imaging Risk Calculators for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer |
title_sort | comparison of rotterdam and barcelona magnetic resonance imaging risk calculators for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer |
topic | Prostatic Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morotejuan comparisonofrotterdamandbarcelonamagneticresonanceimagingriskcalculatorsforpredictingclinicallysignificantprostatecancer AT borquefernandoangel comparisonofrotterdamandbarcelonamagneticresonanceimagingriskcalculatorsforpredictingclinicallysignificantprostatecancer AT triquellmarina comparisonofrotterdamandbarcelonamagneticresonanceimagingriskcalculatorsforpredictingclinicallysignificantprostatecancer AT campistolmiriam comparisonofrotterdamandbarcelonamagneticresonanceimagingriskcalculatorsforpredictingclinicallysignificantprostatecancer AT servianpol comparisonofrotterdamandbarcelonamagneticresonanceimagingriskcalculatorsforpredictingclinicallysignificantprostatecancer AT abascaljosem comparisonofrotterdamandbarcelonamagneticresonanceimagingriskcalculatorsforpredictingclinicallysignificantprostatecancer AT planasjacques comparisonofrotterdamandbarcelonamagneticresonanceimagingriskcalculatorsforpredictingclinicallysignificantprostatecancer AT mendezolga comparisonofrotterdamandbarcelonamagneticresonanceimagingriskcalculatorsforpredictingclinicallysignificantprostatecancer AT estebanluism comparisonofrotterdamandbarcelonamagneticresonanceimagingriskcalculatorsforpredictingclinicallysignificantprostatecancer AT trillaenrique comparisonofrotterdamandbarcelonamagneticresonanceimagingriskcalculatorsforpredictingclinicallysignificantprostatecancer |