Cargando…
Forecasting the daily demand for emergency medical ambulances in England and Wales: a benchmark model and external validation
BACKGROUND: We aimed to select and externally validate a benchmark method for emergency ambulance services to use to forecast the daily number of calls that result in the dispatch of one or more ambulances. METHODS: The study was conducted using standard methods known to the UK’s NHS to aid implemen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02218-z |
_version_ | 1785070884693737472 |
---|---|
author | Monks, Thomas Harper, Alison Allen, Michael Collins, Lucy Mayne, Andrew |
author_facet | Monks, Thomas Harper, Alison Allen, Michael Collins, Lucy Mayne, Andrew |
author_sort | Monks, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We aimed to select and externally validate a benchmark method for emergency ambulance services to use to forecast the daily number of calls that result in the dispatch of one or more ambulances. METHODS: The study was conducted using standard methods known to the UK’s NHS to aid implementation in practice. We selected our benchmark model from a naive benchmark and 14 standard forecasting methods. Mean absolute scaled error and 80 and 95% prediction interval coverage over a 84 day horizon were evaluated using time series cross validation across eight time series from the South West of England. External validation was conducted by time series cross validation across 13 time series from London, Yorkshire and Welsh Ambulance Services. RESULTS: A model combining a simple average of Facebook’s prophet and regression with ARIMA errors (1, 1, 3)(1, 0, 1, 7) was selected. Benchmark MASE, 80 and 95% prediction intervals were 0.68 (95% CI 0.67 - 0.69), 0.847 (95% CI 0.843 - 0.851), and 0.965 (95% CI 0.949 - 0.977), respectively. Performance in the validation set was within expected ranges for MASE, 0.73 (95% CI 0.72 - 0.74) 80% coverage (0.833; 95% CI 0.828-0.838), and 95% coverage (0.965; 95% CI 0.963-0.967). CONCLUSIONS: We provide a robust externally validated benchmark for future ambulance demand forecasting studies to improve on. Our benchmark forecasting model is high quality and usable by ambulance services. We provide a simple python framework to aid its implementation in practice. The results of this study were implemented in the South West of England. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-023-02218-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10334567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103345672023-07-12 Forecasting the daily demand for emergency medical ambulances in England and Wales: a benchmark model and external validation Monks, Thomas Harper, Alison Allen, Michael Collins, Lucy Mayne, Andrew BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: We aimed to select and externally validate a benchmark method for emergency ambulance services to use to forecast the daily number of calls that result in the dispatch of one or more ambulances. METHODS: The study was conducted using standard methods known to the UK’s NHS to aid implementation in practice. We selected our benchmark model from a naive benchmark and 14 standard forecasting methods. Mean absolute scaled error and 80 and 95% prediction interval coverage over a 84 day horizon were evaluated using time series cross validation across eight time series from the South West of England. External validation was conducted by time series cross validation across 13 time series from London, Yorkshire and Welsh Ambulance Services. RESULTS: A model combining a simple average of Facebook’s prophet and regression with ARIMA errors (1, 1, 3)(1, 0, 1, 7) was selected. Benchmark MASE, 80 and 95% prediction intervals were 0.68 (95% CI 0.67 - 0.69), 0.847 (95% CI 0.843 - 0.851), and 0.965 (95% CI 0.949 - 0.977), respectively. Performance in the validation set was within expected ranges for MASE, 0.73 (95% CI 0.72 - 0.74) 80% coverage (0.833; 95% CI 0.828-0.838), and 95% coverage (0.965; 95% CI 0.963-0.967). CONCLUSIONS: We provide a robust externally validated benchmark for future ambulance demand forecasting studies to improve on. Our benchmark forecasting model is high quality and usable by ambulance services. We provide a simple python framework to aid its implementation in practice. The results of this study were implemented in the South West of England. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-023-02218-z. BioMed Central 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10334567/ /pubmed/37434185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02218-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Monks, Thomas Harper, Alison Allen, Michael Collins, Lucy Mayne, Andrew Forecasting the daily demand for emergency medical ambulances in England and Wales: a benchmark model and external validation |
title | Forecasting the daily demand for emergency medical ambulances in England and Wales: a benchmark model and external validation |
title_full | Forecasting the daily demand for emergency medical ambulances in England and Wales: a benchmark model and external validation |
title_fullStr | Forecasting the daily demand for emergency medical ambulances in England and Wales: a benchmark model and external validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Forecasting the daily demand for emergency medical ambulances in England and Wales: a benchmark model and external validation |
title_short | Forecasting the daily demand for emergency medical ambulances in England and Wales: a benchmark model and external validation |
title_sort | forecasting the daily demand for emergency medical ambulances in england and wales: a benchmark model and external validation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02218-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monksthomas forecastingthedailydemandforemergencymedicalambulancesinenglandandwalesabenchmarkmodelandexternalvalidation AT harperalison forecastingthedailydemandforemergencymedicalambulancesinenglandandwalesabenchmarkmodelandexternalvalidation AT allenmichael forecastingthedailydemandforemergencymedicalambulancesinenglandandwalesabenchmarkmodelandexternalvalidation AT collinslucy forecastingthedailydemandforemergencymedicalambulancesinenglandandwalesabenchmarkmodelandexternalvalidation AT mayneandrew forecastingthedailydemandforemergencymedicalambulancesinenglandandwalesabenchmarkmodelandexternalvalidation |