Cargando…
Femoral offset restoration affects the early outcome of revision in patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures of Vancouver B2 - a single-center retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Femoral offset (FO) restoration plays an important role in improving the prognosis and quality of life of patients undergoing hip replacement. However, it is not given enough attention in revisions among patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFFs); instead, more attention is g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06694-2 |
_version_ | 1785070890735632384 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Lei Song, Wenjing Zhang, Zhongyuan Xu, Ziyao Sun, Mengshuai Gao, Guangling Jiang, Hongjiang Ju, Changjun |
author_facet | Sun, Lei Song, Wenjing Zhang, Zhongyuan Xu, Ziyao Sun, Mengshuai Gao, Guangling Jiang, Hongjiang Ju, Changjun |
author_sort | Sun, Lei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Femoral offset (FO) restoration plays an important role in improving the prognosis and quality of life of patients undergoing hip replacement. However, it is not given enough attention in revisions among patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFFs); instead, more attention is given to reduction, fixation of fractures and stabilizing prostheses. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of FO restoration on the function of the hip joint in revisions of patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2. Moreover, we studied whether there is a difference in FO restoration between modular and nonmodular stems. METHODS: A retrospective review of 20 patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2 revised with a tapered fluted modular titanium stem and 22 patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2 revised with a tapered fluted nonmodular titanium stem from 2016 to 2021 was conducted. Based on the difference between the FO of the affected side and that of the healthy side, 26 patients were allocated into Group A (difference ≤ 4 mm), and 16 patients were allocated into Group B (difference > 4 mm). The postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS), range of motion of the hip joint, length of both lower limbs and dislocation were compared between Group A and Group B. The proportions of patients with FO restoration (difference ≤ 4 mm) and stem subsidence were compared between the modular and nonmodular groups. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 34.3 ± 17.3 months, and all cases achieved fracture healing at the last visit. Patients in Group A had a higher HHS, larger range of abduction, fewer dislocations and less limb length discrepancy (LLD). Patients in the modular group had a higher proportion of FO restoration and less subsidence. CONCLUSION: FO restoration improves postoperative hip joint function and reduces dislocation and LLD in revisions of patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2. Compared with nonmodular prostheses, modular prostheses tend to be easier for FO restoration under complex circumstances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10334594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103345942023-07-12 Femoral offset restoration affects the early outcome of revision in patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures of Vancouver B2 - a single-center retrospective cohort study Sun, Lei Song, Wenjing Zhang, Zhongyuan Xu, Ziyao Sun, Mengshuai Gao, Guangling Jiang, Hongjiang Ju, Changjun BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Femoral offset (FO) restoration plays an important role in improving the prognosis and quality of life of patients undergoing hip replacement. However, it is not given enough attention in revisions among patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFFs); instead, more attention is given to reduction, fixation of fractures and stabilizing prostheses. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of FO restoration on the function of the hip joint in revisions of patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2. Moreover, we studied whether there is a difference in FO restoration between modular and nonmodular stems. METHODS: A retrospective review of 20 patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2 revised with a tapered fluted modular titanium stem and 22 patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2 revised with a tapered fluted nonmodular titanium stem from 2016 to 2021 was conducted. Based on the difference between the FO of the affected side and that of the healthy side, 26 patients were allocated into Group A (difference ≤ 4 mm), and 16 patients were allocated into Group B (difference > 4 mm). The postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS), range of motion of the hip joint, length of both lower limbs and dislocation were compared between Group A and Group B. The proportions of patients with FO restoration (difference ≤ 4 mm) and stem subsidence were compared between the modular and nonmodular groups. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 34.3 ± 17.3 months, and all cases achieved fracture healing at the last visit. Patients in Group A had a higher HHS, larger range of abduction, fewer dislocations and less limb length discrepancy (LLD). Patients in the modular group had a higher proportion of FO restoration and less subsidence. CONCLUSION: FO restoration improves postoperative hip joint function and reduces dislocation and LLD in revisions of patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2. Compared with nonmodular prostheses, modular prostheses tend to be easier for FO restoration under complex circumstances. BioMed Central 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10334594/ /pubmed/37434207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06694-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sun, Lei Song, Wenjing Zhang, Zhongyuan Xu, Ziyao Sun, Mengshuai Gao, Guangling Jiang, Hongjiang Ju, Changjun Femoral offset restoration affects the early outcome of revision in patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures of Vancouver B2 - a single-center retrospective cohort study |
title | Femoral offset restoration affects the early outcome of revision in patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures of Vancouver B2 - a single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Femoral offset restoration affects the early outcome of revision in patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures of Vancouver B2 - a single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Femoral offset restoration affects the early outcome of revision in patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures of Vancouver B2 - a single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Femoral offset restoration affects the early outcome of revision in patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures of Vancouver B2 - a single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Femoral offset restoration affects the early outcome of revision in patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures of Vancouver B2 - a single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | femoral offset restoration affects the early outcome of revision in patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures of vancouver b2 - a single-center retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06694-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunlei femoraloffsetrestorationaffectstheearlyoutcomeofrevisioninpatientswithperiprostheticfemoralfracturesofvancouverb2asinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT songwenjing femoraloffsetrestorationaffectstheearlyoutcomeofrevisioninpatientswithperiprostheticfemoralfracturesofvancouverb2asinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhangzhongyuan femoraloffsetrestorationaffectstheearlyoutcomeofrevisioninpatientswithperiprostheticfemoralfracturesofvancouverb2asinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT xuziyao femoraloffsetrestorationaffectstheearlyoutcomeofrevisioninpatientswithperiprostheticfemoralfracturesofvancouverb2asinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT sunmengshuai femoraloffsetrestorationaffectstheearlyoutcomeofrevisioninpatientswithperiprostheticfemoralfracturesofvancouverb2asinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT gaoguangling femoraloffsetrestorationaffectstheearlyoutcomeofrevisioninpatientswithperiprostheticfemoralfracturesofvancouverb2asinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT jianghongjiang femoraloffsetrestorationaffectstheearlyoutcomeofrevisioninpatientswithperiprostheticfemoralfracturesofvancouverb2asinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT juchangjun femoraloffsetrestorationaffectstheearlyoutcomeofrevisioninpatientswithperiprostheticfemoralfracturesofvancouverb2asinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy |