Cargando…

Prescription drug monitoring programs use mandates and prescription stimulant and depressant quantities

BACKGROUND: While the mandate to check patients’ prescription history in Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) database before prescribing/dispensing controlled drugs has been shown to be an important tool to curb opioid abuse, less is known about whether the mandate can reduce the misuse of o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunadi, Christian, Shi, Yuyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16256-9
_version_ 1785070903207395328
author Gunadi, Christian
Shi, Yuyan
author_facet Gunadi, Christian
Shi, Yuyan
author_sort Gunadi, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While the mandate to check patients’ prescription history in Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) database before prescribing/dispensing controlled drugs has been shown to be an important tool to curb opioid abuse, less is known about whether the mandate can reduce the misuse of other commonly abused prescription drugs. We examined whether PDMP use mandates were associated with changes in prescription stimulant and depressant quantities. METHODS: Using data from Automated Reports and Consolidate Ordering System (ARCOS), we employed difference-in-differences design to estimate the association between PDMP use mandates and prescription stimulant and depressant quantities in 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia from 2006 to 2020. Limited PDMP use mandate was specific only to opioids or benzodiazepines. Expansive PDMP use mandate was non-specific to opioid or benzodiazepine and required prescribers/dispensers to check PDMP when prescribing/dispensing targeted controlled substances in Schedule II-V. The main outcomes were population-adjusted prescription stimulant (amphetamine, methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine) and depressant (amobarbital, butalbital, pentobarbital, secobarbital) quantities in grams. RESULTS: There was no evidence that limited PDMP use mandate was associated with a reduction in the prescription stimulant and depressant quantities. However, expansive PDMP use mandate that was non-specific to opioid or benzodiazepine and required prescribers/dispensers to check PDMP when prescribing/dispensing targeted controlled substances in Schedule II-V was associated with 6.2% (95% CI: -10.06%, -2.08%) decline in prescription amphetamine quantity. CONCLUSION: Expansive PDMP use mandate was associated with a decline in prescription amphetamine quantity. Limited PDMP use mandate did not appear to change prescription stimulant and depressant quantities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16256-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10334646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103346462023-07-12 Prescription drug monitoring programs use mandates and prescription stimulant and depressant quantities Gunadi, Christian Shi, Yuyan BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: While the mandate to check patients’ prescription history in Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) database before prescribing/dispensing controlled drugs has been shown to be an important tool to curb opioid abuse, less is known about whether the mandate can reduce the misuse of other commonly abused prescription drugs. We examined whether PDMP use mandates were associated with changes in prescription stimulant and depressant quantities. METHODS: Using data from Automated Reports and Consolidate Ordering System (ARCOS), we employed difference-in-differences design to estimate the association between PDMP use mandates and prescription stimulant and depressant quantities in 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia from 2006 to 2020. Limited PDMP use mandate was specific only to opioids or benzodiazepines. Expansive PDMP use mandate was non-specific to opioid or benzodiazepine and required prescribers/dispensers to check PDMP when prescribing/dispensing targeted controlled substances in Schedule II-V. The main outcomes were population-adjusted prescription stimulant (amphetamine, methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine) and depressant (amobarbital, butalbital, pentobarbital, secobarbital) quantities in grams. RESULTS: There was no evidence that limited PDMP use mandate was associated with a reduction in the prescription stimulant and depressant quantities. However, expansive PDMP use mandate that was non-specific to opioid or benzodiazepine and required prescribers/dispensers to check PDMP when prescribing/dispensing targeted controlled substances in Schedule II-V was associated with 6.2% (95% CI: -10.06%, -2.08%) decline in prescription amphetamine quantity. CONCLUSION: Expansive PDMP use mandate was associated with a decline in prescription amphetamine quantity. Limited PDMP use mandate did not appear to change prescription stimulant and depressant quantities. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16256-9. BioMed Central 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10334646/ /pubmed/37434122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16256-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gunadi, Christian
Shi, Yuyan
Prescription drug monitoring programs use mandates and prescription stimulant and depressant quantities
title Prescription drug monitoring programs use mandates and prescription stimulant and depressant quantities
title_full Prescription drug monitoring programs use mandates and prescription stimulant and depressant quantities
title_fullStr Prescription drug monitoring programs use mandates and prescription stimulant and depressant quantities
title_full_unstemmed Prescription drug monitoring programs use mandates and prescription stimulant and depressant quantities
title_short Prescription drug monitoring programs use mandates and prescription stimulant and depressant quantities
title_sort prescription drug monitoring programs use mandates and prescription stimulant and depressant quantities
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16256-9
work_keys_str_mv AT gunadichristian prescriptiondrugmonitoringprogramsusemandatesandprescriptionstimulantanddepressantquantities
AT shiyuyan prescriptiondrugmonitoringprogramsusemandatesandprescriptionstimulantanddepressantquantities