Cargando…

Cardiac Rehabilitation Facebook Intervention: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: The adherence to cardiac rehabilitation is low. Social media has been used to improve motivation and cardiac rehabilitation completion, but the authors did not find Facebook interventions for these purposes in the literature. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the feas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siegmund, Lee Anne, Bena, James F, Morrison, Shannon L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37318865
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/46828
_version_ 1785070916794843136
author Siegmund, Lee Anne
Bena, James F
Morrison, Shannon L
author_facet Siegmund, Lee Anne
Bena, James F
Morrison, Shannon L
author_sort Siegmund, Lee Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The adherence to cardiac rehabilitation is low. Social media has been used to improve motivation and cardiac rehabilitation completion, but the authors did not find Facebook interventions for these purposes in the literature. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Facebook Intervention (Chat) for affecting changes in exercise motivation and need satisfaction and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation. METHODS: The Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3 and Psychological Need Satisfaction for Exercise were used to measure motivation and need satisfaction (competence, autonomy, and relatedness) before and after the Chat intervention. To support need satisfaction, the intervention included educational posts, supportive posts, and interaction with peers. The feasibility measures included recruitment, engagement, and acceptability. Groups were compared using analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Paired t tests were used to assess motivation and need satisfaction change, and Pearson or Spearman correlations were used for continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 32 participants were lost to follow-up and 22 were included in the analysis. Higher motivation at intake (relative autonomy index 0.53, 95% CI 0.14-0.78; P=.01) and change in need satisfaction-autonomy (relative autonomy index 0.61, 95% CI 0.09-0.87; P=.02) were associated with more completed sessions. No between-group differences were found. Engagement included “likes” (n=210) and “hits” (n=157). For acceptability, mean scores on a 1 (not at all) to 5 (quite a bit) Likert scale for feeling supported and in touch with providers were 4.6 and 4.4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptability of the Chat group was high; however, intervention feasibility could not be determined due to the small sample size. Those with greater motivation at intake completed more sessions, indicating its importance in cardiac rehabilitation completion. Despite challenges with recruitment and engagement, important lessons were learned. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02971813; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02971813 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/resprot.7554
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10334713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103347132023-07-12 Cardiac Rehabilitation Facebook Intervention: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial Siegmund, Lee Anne Bena, James F Morrison, Shannon L JMIR Cardio Original Paper BACKGROUND: The adherence to cardiac rehabilitation is low. Social media has been used to improve motivation and cardiac rehabilitation completion, but the authors did not find Facebook interventions for these purposes in the literature. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Facebook Intervention (Chat) for affecting changes in exercise motivation and need satisfaction and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation. METHODS: The Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3 and Psychological Need Satisfaction for Exercise were used to measure motivation and need satisfaction (competence, autonomy, and relatedness) before and after the Chat intervention. To support need satisfaction, the intervention included educational posts, supportive posts, and interaction with peers. The feasibility measures included recruitment, engagement, and acceptability. Groups were compared using analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Paired t tests were used to assess motivation and need satisfaction change, and Pearson or Spearman correlations were used for continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 32 participants were lost to follow-up and 22 were included in the analysis. Higher motivation at intake (relative autonomy index 0.53, 95% CI 0.14-0.78; P=.01) and change in need satisfaction-autonomy (relative autonomy index 0.61, 95% CI 0.09-0.87; P=.02) were associated with more completed sessions. No between-group differences were found. Engagement included “likes” (n=210) and “hits” (n=157). For acceptability, mean scores on a 1 (not at all) to 5 (quite a bit) Likert scale for feeling supported and in touch with providers were 4.6 and 4.4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptability of the Chat group was high; however, intervention feasibility could not be determined due to the small sample size. Those with greater motivation at intake completed more sessions, indicating its importance in cardiac rehabilitation completion. Despite challenges with recruitment and engagement, important lessons were learned. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02971813; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02971813 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/resprot.7554 JMIR Publications 2023-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10334713/ /pubmed/37318865 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/46828 Text en ©Lee Anne Siegmund, James F Bena, Shannon L Morrison. Originally published in JMIR Cardio (https://cardio.jmir.org), 15.06.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Cardio, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://cardio.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Siegmund, Lee Anne
Bena, James F
Morrison, Shannon L
Cardiac Rehabilitation Facebook Intervention: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
title Cardiac Rehabilitation Facebook Intervention: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Cardiac Rehabilitation Facebook Intervention: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Cardiac Rehabilitation Facebook Intervention: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac Rehabilitation Facebook Intervention: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Cardiac Rehabilitation Facebook Intervention: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort cardiac rehabilitation facebook intervention: feasibility randomized controlled trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37318865
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/46828
work_keys_str_mv AT siegmundleeanne cardiacrehabilitationfacebookinterventionfeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT benajamesf cardiacrehabilitationfacebookinterventionfeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT morrisonshannonl cardiacrehabilitationfacebookinterventionfeasibilityrandomizedcontrolledtrial