Cargando…

Memory for artwork is predictable

Viewing art is often seen as a highly personal and subjective experience. However, are there universal factors that make a work of art memorable? We conducted three experiments, where we recorded online memory performance for 4,021 paintings from the Art Institute of Chicago, tested in-person memory...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Trent M., Bainbridge, Wilma A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37399388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302389120
_version_ 1785070925062864896
author Davis, Trent M.
Bainbridge, Wilma A.
author_facet Davis, Trent M.
Bainbridge, Wilma A.
author_sort Davis, Trent M.
collection PubMed
description Viewing art is often seen as a highly personal and subjective experience. However, are there universal factors that make a work of art memorable? We conducted three experiments, where we recorded online memory performance for 4,021 paintings from the Art Institute of Chicago, tested in-person memory after an unconstrained visit to the Art Institute, and obtained abstract attribute measures such as beauty and emotional valence for these pieces. Participants showed significant agreement in their memories both online and in-person, suggesting that pieces have an intrinsic “memorability” based solely on their visual properties that is predictive of memory in a naturalistic museum setting. Importantly, ResMem, a deep learning neural network designed to estimate image memorability, could significantly predict memory both online and in-person based on the images alone, and these predictions could not be explained by other low- or high-level attributes like color, content type, aesthetics, and emotion. A regression comprising ResMem and other stimulus factors could predict as much as half of the variance of in-person memory performance. Further, ResMem could predict the fame of a piece, despite having no cultural or historical knowledge. These results suggest that perceptual features of a painting play a major role in influencing its success, both in memory for a museum visit and in cultural memory over generations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10334794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103347942023-07-12 Memory for artwork is predictable Davis, Trent M. Bainbridge, Wilma A. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences Viewing art is often seen as a highly personal and subjective experience. However, are there universal factors that make a work of art memorable? We conducted three experiments, where we recorded online memory performance for 4,021 paintings from the Art Institute of Chicago, tested in-person memory after an unconstrained visit to the Art Institute, and obtained abstract attribute measures such as beauty and emotional valence for these pieces. Participants showed significant agreement in their memories both online and in-person, suggesting that pieces have an intrinsic “memorability” based solely on their visual properties that is predictive of memory in a naturalistic museum setting. Importantly, ResMem, a deep learning neural network designed to estimate image memorability, could significantly predict memory both online and in-person based on the images alone, and these predictions could not be explained by other low- or high-level attributes like color, content type, aesthetics, and emotion. A regression comprising ResMem and other stimulus factors could predict as much as half of the variance of in-person memory performance. Further, ResMem could predict the fame of a piece, despite having no cultural or historical knowledge. These results suggest that perceptual features of a painting play a major role in influencing its success, both in memory for a museum visit and in cultural memory over generations. National Academy of Sciences 2023-07-03 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10334794/ /pubmed/37399388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302389120 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Davis, Trent M.
Bainbridge, Wilma A.
Memory for artwork is predictable
title Memory for artwork is predictable
title_full Memory for artwork is predictable
title_fullStr Memory for artwork is predictable
title_full_unstemmed Memory for artwork is predictable
title_short Memory for artwork is predictable
title_sort memory for artwork is predictable
topic Social Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37399388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302389120
work_keys_str_mv AT davistrentm memoryforartworkispredictable
AT bainbridgewilmaa memoryforartworkispredictable