Cargando…

To Refer or Not to Refer in Teledermoscopy: Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: Challenges remain for general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing (pre)malignant and benign skin lesions. Teledermoscopy (TDsc) supports GPs in diagnosing these skin lesions guided by teledermatologists' (TDs) diagnosis and advice and prevents unnecessary referrals to dermatology care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tensen, Esmée, van Sinderen, Femke, Bekkenk, Marcel W, Jaspers, Monique W, Peute, Linda W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37632902
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40888
_version_ 1785070948712448000
author Tensen, Esmée
van Sinderen, Femke
Bekkenk, Marcel W
Jaspers, Monique W
Peute, Linda W
author_facet Tensen, Esmée
van Sinderen, Femke
Bekkenk, Marcel W
Jaspers, Monique W
Peute, Linda W
author_sort Tensen, Esmée
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Challenges remain for general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing (pre)malignant and benign skin lesions. Teledermoscopy (TDsc) supports GPs in diagnosing these skin lesions guided by teledermatologists' (TDs) diagnosis and advice and prevents unnecessary referrals to dermatology care. However, the impact of the availability of TDsc on GPs’ self-reported referral decisions to dermatology care before and after the TDsc consultation is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess and compare the initial self-reported referral decisions of GPs before TDsc versus their final self-reported referral decisions after TDsc for skin lesions diagnosed by the TD as (pre)malignant or benign. METHODS: TDsc consultations requested by GPs in daily practice between July 2015 and June 2020 with a TD assessment and diagnosis were extracted from a nationwide Dutch telemedicine database. Based on GP self-administered questions, the GPs’ referral decisions before and their final referral decision after TDsc consultation were assessed for (pre)malignant and benign TD diagnoses. RESULTS: GP self-administered questions and TD diagnoses were evaluated for 6364 TDsc consultations (9.3% malignant, 8.8% premalignant, and 81.9% benign skin lesions). In half of the TDsc consultations, GPs adjusted their initial referral decision after TD advice and TD diagnosis. Initially, GPs did not have the intention to refer 67 (56.8%) of 118 patients with a malignant TD diagnosis and 26 (16.0%) of 162 patients with a premalignant TD diagnosis but then decided to refer these patients after the TDsc consultation. Furthermore, GPs adjusted their decision from referral to nonreferral for 2534 (74.9%) benign skin lesions (including 676 seborrheic keratosis and 131 vascular lesions). CONCLUSIONS: GPs adjusted their referral decision in 52% (n=3306) of the TDsc consultations after the TD assessment. The availability of TDsc is thus of added value and assists GPs in their (non)referral for patients with skin lesions to dermatology care. TDsc resulted in referrals of patients with (pre)malignant skin lesions that GPs would not have referred directly to the dermatologist. TDsc also led to a reduction of unnecessary referrals of patients with low complex benign skin lesions (eg, seborrheic keratosis and vascular lesions).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10334922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103349222023-07-18 To Refer or Not to Refer in Teledermoscopy: Retrospective Study Tensen, Esmée van Sinderen, Femke Bekkenk, Marcel W Jaspers, Monique W Peute, Linda W JMIR Dermatol Original Paper BACKGROUND: Challenges remain for general practitioners (GPs) in diagnosing (pre)malignant and benign skin lesions. Teledermoscopy (TDsc) supports GPs in diagnosing these skin lesions guided by teledermatologists' (TDs) diagnosis and advice and prevents unnecessary referrals to dermatology care. However, the impact of the availability of TDsc on GPs’ self-reported referral decisions to dermatology care before and after the TDsc consultation is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess and compare the initial self-reported referral decisions of GPs before TDsc versus their final self-reported referral decisions after TDsc for skin lesions diagnosed by the TD as (pre)malignant or benign. METHODS: TDsc consultations requested by GPs in daily practice between July 2015 and June 2020 with a TD assessment and diagnosis were extracted from a nationwide Dutch telemedicine database. Based on GP self-administered questions, the GPs’ referral decisions before and their final referral decision after TDsc consultation were assessed for (pre)malignant and benign TD diagnoses. RESULTS: GP self-administered questions and TD diagnoses were evaluated for 6364 TDsc consultations (9.3% malignant, 8.8% premalignant, and 81.9% benign skin lesions). In half of the TDsc consultations, GPs adjusted their initial referral decision after TD advice and TD diagnosis. Initially, GPs did not have the intention to refer 67 (56.8%) of 118 patients with a malignant TD diagnosis and 26 (16.0%) of 162 patients with a premalignant TD diagnosis but then decided to refer these patients after the TDsc consultation. Furthermore, GPs adjusted their decision from referral to nonreferral for 2534 (74.9%) benign skin lesions (including 676 seborrheic keratosis and 131 vascular lesions). CONCLUSIONS: GPs adjusted their referral decision in 52% (n=3306) of the TDsc consultations after the TD assessment. The availability of TDsc is thus of added value and assists GPs in their (non)referral for patients with skin lesions to dermatology care. TDsc resulted in referrals of patients with (pre)malignant skin lesions that GPs would not have referred directly to the dermatologist. TDsc also led to a reduction of unnecessary referrals of patients with low complex benign skin lesions (eg, seborrheic keratosis and vascular lesions). JMIR Publications 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10334922/ /pubmed/37632902 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40888 Text en ©Esmée Tensen, Femke van Sinderen, Marcel W Bekkenk, Monique W Jaspers, Linda W Peute. Originally published in JMIR Dermatology (http://derma.jmir.org), 23.09.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Dermatology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://derma.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Tensen, Esmée
van Sinderen, Femke
Bekkenk, Marcel W
Jaspers, Monique W
Peute, Linda W
To Refer or Not to Refer in Teledermoscopy: Retrospective Study
title To Refer or Not to Refer in Teledermoscopy: Retrospective Study
title_full To Refer or Not to Refer in Teledermoscopy: Retrospective Study
title_fullStr To Refer or Not to Refer in Teledermoscopy: Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed To Refer or Not to Refer in Teledermoscopy: Retrospective Study
title_short To Refer or Not to Refer in Teledermoscopy: Retrospective Study
title_sort to refer or not to refer in teledermoscopy: retrospective study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10334922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37632902
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40888
work_keys_str_mv AT tensenesmee toreferornottoreferinteledermoscopyretrospectivestudy
AT vansinderenfemke toreferornottoreferinteledermoscopyretrospectivestudy
AT bekkenkmarcelw toreferornottoreferinteledermoscopyretrospectivestudy
AT jaspersmoniquew toreferornottoreferinteledermoscopyretrospectivestudy
AT peutelindaw toreferornottoreferinteledermoscopyretrospectivestudy