Cargando…

Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Optimal delivery and organisation of care is critical for surgical outcomes and healthcare systems efficiency. Anaesthesia volumes have been recently associated with improved postoperative recovery outcomes; however, the mechanism is unclear. Understanding the individual processes of c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajendran, Luckshi, Hopkins, Alexander, Hallet, Julie, Sinha, Rishie, Tanwani, Jaya, Kao, Mian-Mian, Eskander, Antoine, Barabash, Victoria, Idestrup, Christopher, Perez, Pablo, Jerath, Angela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068339
_version_ 1785070993540120576
author Rajendran, Luckshi
Hopkins, Alexander
Hallet, Julie
Sinha, Rishie
Tanwani, Jaya
Kao, Mian-Mian
Eskander, Antoine
Barabash, Victoria
Idestrup, Christopher
Perez, Pablo
Jerath, Angela
author_facet Rajendran, Luckshi
Hopkins, Alexander
Hallet, Julie
Sinha, Rishie
Tanwani, Jaya
Kao, Mian-Mian
Eskander, Antoine
Barabash, Victoria
Idestrup, Christopher
Perez, Pablo
Jerath, Angela
author_sort Rajendran, Luckshi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Optimal delivery and organisation of care is critical for surgical outcomes and healthcare systems efficiency. Anaesthesia volumes have been recently associated with improved postoperative recovery outcomes; however, the mechanism is unclear. Understanding the individual processes of care (interventions received by the patient) is important to design effective systems that leverage the volume-outcome association to improve patient care. The primary objective of this scoping review is to systematically map the evidence regarding intraoperative processes of care for upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery. We aim to synthesise the quantity, type, and scope of studies on intraoperative processes of care in adults who undergo major upper gastrointestinal cancer surgeries (oesophagectomy, hepatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and gastrectomy) to better understand the volume-outcome relationship for anaesthesiology care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O’Malley framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension framework for scoping reviews. We will systematically search MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases for original research articles published after 2010 examining postoperative outcomes in adult patients undergoing either: oesophagectomy, hepatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, or gastrectomy, which report at least one intraoperative processes of care (intervention or framework) applied by anaesthesia or surgery. The data from included studies will be extracted, charted, and summarised both quantitatively and qualitatively through descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required for this scoping review. Results will be disseminated through publication targeted at relevant stakeholders in anaesthesiology and cancer surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/392UG; https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-392ug-v1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10335411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103354112023-07-12 Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol Rajendran, Luckshi Hopkins, Alexander Hallet, Julie Sinha, Rishie Tanwani, Jaya Kao, Mian-Mian Eskander, Antoine Barabash, Victoria Idestrup, Christopher Perez, Pablo Jerath, Angela BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Optimal delivery and organisation of care is critical for surgical outcomes and healthcare systems efficiency. Anaesthesia volumes have been recently associated with improved postoperative recovery outcomes; however, the mechanism is unclear. Understanding the individual processes of care (interventions received by the patient) is important to design effective systems that leverage the volume-outcome association to improve patient care. The primary objective of this scoping review is to systematically map the evidence regarding intraoperative processes of care for upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery. We aim to synthesise the quantity, type, and scope of studies on intraoperative processes of care in adults who undergo major upper gastrointestinal cancer surgeries (oesophagectomy, hepatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and gastrectomy) to better understand the volume-outcome relationship for anaesthesiology care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O’Malley framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension framework for scoping reviews. We will systematically search MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases for original research articles published after 2010 examining postoperative outcomes in adult patients undergoing either: oesophagectomy, hepatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, or gastrectomy, which report at least one intraoperative processes of care (intervention or framework) applied by anaesthesia or surgery. The data from included studies will be extracted, charted, and summarised both quantitatively and qualitatively through descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required for this scoping review. Results will be disseminated through publication targeted at relevant stakeholders in anaesthesiology and cancer surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/392UG; https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-392ug-v1. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10335411/ /pubmed/37407044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068339 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
Rajendran, Luckshi
Hopkins, Alexander
Hallet, Julie
Sinha, Rishie
Tanwani, Jaya
Kao, Mian-Mian
Eskander, Antoine
Barabash, Victoria
Idestrup, Christopher
Perez, Pablo
Jerath, Angela
Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol
title Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol
title_full Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol
title_short Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol
title_sort role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068339
work_keys_str_mv AT rajendranluckshi roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol
AT hopkinsalexander roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol
AT halletjulie roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol
AT sinharishie roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol
AT tanwanijaya roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol
AT kaomianmian roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol
AT eskanderantoine roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol
AT barabashvictoria roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol
AT idestrupchristopher roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol
AT perezpablo roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol
AT jerathangela roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol