Cargando…
Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Optimal delivery and organisation of care is critical for surgical outcomes and healthcare systems efficiency. Anaesthesia volumes have been recently associated with improved postoperative recovery outcomes; however, the mechanism is unclear. Understanding the individual processes of c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068339 |
_version_ | 1785070993540120576 |
---|---|
author | Rajendran, Luckshi Hopkins, Alexander Hallet, Julie Sinha, Rishie Tanwani, Jaya Kao, Mian-Mian Eskander, Antoine Barabash, Victoria Idestrup, Christopher Perez, Pablo Jerath, Angela |
author_facet | Rajendran, Luckshi Hopkins, Alexander Hallet, Julie Sinha, Rishie Tanwani, Jaya Kao, Mian-Mian Eskander, Antoine Barabash, Victoria Idestrup, Christopher Perez, Pablo Jerath, Angela |
author_sort | Rajendran, Luckshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Optimal delivery and organisation of care is critical for surgical outcomes and healthcare systems efficiency. Anaesthesia volumes have been recently associated with improved postoperative recovery outcomes; however, the mechanism is unclear. Understanding the individual processes of care (interventions received by the patient) is important to design effective systems that leverage the volume-outcome association to improve patient care. The primary objective of this scoping review is to systematically map the evidence regarding intraoperative processes of care for upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery. We aim to synthesise the quantity, type, and scope of studies on intraoperative processes of care in adults who undergo major upper gastrointestinal cancer surgeries (oesophagectomy, hepatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and gastrectomy) to better understand the volume-outcome relationship for anaesthesiology care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O’Malley framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension framework for scoping reviews. We will systematically search MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases for original research articles published after 2010 examining postoperative outcomes in adult patients undergoing either: oesophagectomy, hepatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, or gastrectomy, which report at least one intraoperative processes of care (intervention or framework) applied by anaesthesia or surgery. The data from included studies will be extracted, charted, and summarised both quantitatively and qualitatively through descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required for this scoping review. Results will be disseminated through publication targeted at relevant stakeholders in anaesthesiology and cancer surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/392UG; https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-392ug-v1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10335411 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103354112023-07-12 Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol Rajendran, Luckshi Hopkins, Alexander Hallet, Julie Sinha, Rishie Tanwani, Jaya Kao, Mian-Mian Eskander, Antoine Barabash, Victoria Idestrup, Christopher Perez, Pablo Jerath, Angela BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Optimal delivery and organisation of care is critical for surgical outcomes and healthcare systems efficiency. Anaesthesia volumes have been recently associated with improved postoperative recovery outcomes; however, the mechanism is unclear. Understanding the individual processes of care (interventions received by the patient) is important to design effective systems that leverage the volume-outcome association to improve patient care. The primary objective of this scoping review is to systematically map the evidence regarding intraoperative processes of care for upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery. We aim to synthesise the quantity, type, and scope of studies on intraoperative processes of care in adults who undergo major upper gastrointestinal cancer surgeries (oesophagectomy, hepatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and gastrectomy) to better understand the volume-outcome relationship for anaesthesiology care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O’Malley framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension framework for scoping reviews. We will systematically search MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases for original research articles published after 2010 examining postoperative outcomes in adult patients undergoing either: oesophagectomy, hepatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, or gastrectomy, which report at least one intraoperative processes of care (intervention or framework) applied by anaesthesia or surgery. The data from included studies will be extracted, charted, and summarised both quantitatively and qualitatively through descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required for this scoping review. Results will be disseminated through publication targeted at relevant stakeholders in anaesthesiology and cancer surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/392UG; https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-392ug-v1. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10335411/ /pubmed/37407044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068339 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Surgery Rajendran, Luckshi Hopkins, Alexander Hallet, Julie Sinha, Rishie Tanwani, Jaya Kao, Mian-Mian Eskander, Antoine Barabash, Victoria Idestrup, Christopher Perez, Pablo Jerath, Angela Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol |
title | Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol |
title_full | Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr | Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol |
title_short | Role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol |
title_sort | role of intraoperative processes of care during major upper gastrointestinal oncological resection in postoperative outcomes: a scoping review protocol |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068339 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajendranluckshi roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol AT hopkinsalexander roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol AT halletjulie roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol AT sinharishie roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol AT tanwanijaya roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol AT kaomianmian roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol AT eskanderantoine roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol AT barabashvictoria roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol AT idestrupchristopher roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol AT perezpablo roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol AT jerathangela roleofintraoperativeprocessesofcareduringmajoruppergastrointestinaloncologicalresectioninpostoperativeoutcomesascopingreviewprotocol |