Cargando…

Sharing voice during deliberative engagement to improve guideline adherence in dental clinics: findings from a qualitative evaluation of an online deliberative forum discussion

OBJECTIVES: Selecting effective implementation strategies to support guideline-concordant dental care is a complex process. For this research project, an online deliberative forum brought together staff from dental clinics to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of implementation strategies and barr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gruß, Inga, Dawson, Tim, Kaplan, Charles D, Pihlstrom, Daniel J, Reich, Sacha, Fellows, Jeffrey L, Polk, Deborah E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072727
_version_ 1785070993763467264
author Gruß, Inga
Dawson, Tim
Kaplan, Charles D
Pihlstrom, Daniel J
Reich, Sacha
Fellows, Jeffrey L
Polk, Deborah E
author_facet Gruß, Inga
Dawson, Tim
Kaplan, Charles D
Pihlstrom, Daniel J
Reich, Sacha
Fellows, Jeffrey L
Polk, Deborah E
author_sort Gruß, Inga
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Selecting effective implementation strategies to support guideline-concordant dental care is a complex process. For this research project, an online deliberative forum brought together staff from dental clinics to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of implementation strategies and barriers to implementation of a component of a dental (pit-and-fissure) guideline. The goal was to determine whether deliberative engagement enabled participants’ sharing of promotive and prohibitive voice about implementation strategies to promote guideline-concordant care. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of online chat transcripts of facilitated deliberations from 31 small group sessions. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Dental (KP Dental) in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: All staff from 16 dental offices. RESULTS: The directed content analysis revealed that participants shared prohibitive and promotive voice when offering critique of the barriers and the implementation strategies suggested by the researchers. The analysis also revealed that the focus of the deliberations often was not on the aspect of the pit-and-fissure guideline intended by the research team for deliberation. CONCLUSIONS: The deliberative forum discussions were a productive venue to ask staff in dental clinics to share their perspectives on strategies to promote guideline-concordant care as well as barriers. Participants demonstrated prohibitive voice and engaged critically with the materials the research team had put together. An important limitation of the deliberation was that the discussion often centred around an aspect of the pit-and-fissure guideline that already was implemented well. To ensure a deliberation oriented towards resolving challenging aspects of the pit-and-fissure guideline, greater familiarity with the guideline would have been important, as well as more intimate knowledge of the current discrepancies in guideline-concordant care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This project is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with ID NCT04682730. The trial was first registered on 18 December 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04682730.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10335412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103354122023-07-12 Sharing voice during deliberative engagement to improve guideline adherence in dental clinics: findings from a qualitative evaluation of an online deliberative forum discussion Gruß, Inga Dawson, Tim Kaplan, Charles D Pihlstrom, Daniel J Reich, Sacha Fellows, Jeffrey L Polk, Deborah E BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: Selecting effective implementation strategies to support guideline-concordant dental care is a complex process. For this research project, an online deliberative forum brought together staff from dental clinics to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of implementation strategies and barriers to implementation of a component of a dental (pit-and-fissure) guideline. The goal was to determine whether deliberative engagement enabled participants’ sharing of promotive and prohibitive voice about implementation strategies to promote guideline-concordant care. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of online chat transcripts of facilitated deliberations from 31 small group sessions. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Dental (KP Dental) in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: All staff from 16 dental offices. RESULTS: The directed content analysis revealed that participants shared prohibitive and promotive voice when offering critique of the barriers and the implementation strategies suggested by the researchers. The analysis also revealed that the focus of the deliberations often was not on the aspect of the pit-and-fissure guideline intended by the research team for deliberation. CONCLUSIONS: The deliberative forum discussions were a productive venue to ask staff in dental clinics to share their perspectives on strategies to promote guideline-concordant care as well as barriers. Participants demonstrated prohibitive voice and engaged critically with the materials the research team had put together. An important limitation of the deliberation was that the discussion often centred around an aspect of the pit-and-fissure guideline that already was implemented well. To ensure a deliberation oriented towards resolving challenging aspects of the pit-and-fissure guideline, greater familiarity with the guideline would have been important, as well as more intimate knowledge of the current discrepancies in guideline-concordant care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This project is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with ID NCT04682730. The trial was first registered on 18 December 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04682730. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10335412/ /pubmed/37407045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072727 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Gruß, Inga
Dawson, Tim
Kaplan, Charles D
Pihlstrom, Daniel J
Reich, Sacha
Fellows, Jeffrey L
Polk, Deborah E
Sharing voice during deliberative engagement to improve guideline adherence in dental clinics: findings from a qualitative evaluation of an online deliberative forum discussion
title Sharing voice during deliberative engagement to improve guideline adherence in dental clinics: findings from a qualitative evaluation of an online deliberative forum discussion
title_full Sharing voice during deliberative engagement to improve guideline adherence in dental clinics: findings from a qualitative evaluation of an online deliberative forum discussion
title_fullStr Sharing voice during deliberative engagement to improve guideline adherence in dental clinics: findings from a qualitative evaluation of an online deliberative forum discussion
title_full_unstemmed Sharing voice during deliberative engagement to improve guideline adherence in dental clinics: findings from a qualitative evaluation of an online deliberative forum discussion
title_short Sharing voice during deliberative engagement to improve guideline adherence in dental clinics: findings from a qualitative evaluation of an online deliberative forum discussion
title_sort sharing voice during deliberative engagement to improve guideline adherence in dental clinics: findings from a qualitative evaluation of an online deliberative forum discussion
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407045
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072727
work_keys_str_mv AT grußinga sharingvoiceduringdeliberativeengagementtoimproveguidelineadherenceindentalclinicsfindingsfromaqualitativeevaluationofanonlinedeliberativeforumdiscussion
AT dawsontim sharingvoiceduringdeliberativeengagementtoimproveguidelineadherenceindentalclinicsfindingsfromaqualitativeevaluationofanonlinedeliberativeforumdiscussion
AT kaplancharlesd sharingvoiceduringdeliberativeengagementtoimproveguidelineadherenceindentalclinicsfindingsfromaqualitativeevaluationofanonlinedeliberativeforumdiscussion
AT pihlstromdanielj sharingvoiceduringdeliberativeengagementtoimproveguidelineadherenceindentalclinicsfindingsfromaqualitativeevaluationofanonlinedeliberativeforumdiscussion
AT reichsacha sharingvoiceduringdeliberativeengagementtoimproveguidelineadherenceindentalclinicsfindingsfromaqualitativeevaluationofanonlinedeliberativeforumdiscussion
AT fellowsjeffreyl sharingvoiceduringdeliberativeengagementtoimproveguidelineadherenceindentalclinicsfindingsfromaqualitativeevaluationofanonlinedeliberativeforumdiscussion
AT polkdeborahe sharingvoiceduringdeliberativeengagementtoimproveguidelineadherenceindentalclinicsfindingsfromaqualitativeevaluationofanonlinedeliberativeforumdiscussion