Cargando…
Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV)
BACKGROUND: Violence perpetration is a key outcome to prevent for an important subgroup of individuals presenting to mental health services, including early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services. Needs and risks are typically assessed without structured methods, which could facilitate consistency...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2022-300634 |
_version_ | 1785070997432434688 |
---|---|
author | Whiting, Daniel Mallett, Sue Lennox, Belinda Fazel, Seena |
author_facet | Whiting, Daniel Mallett, Sue Lennox, Belinda Fazel, Seena |
author_sort | Whiting, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Violence perpetration is a key outcome to prevent for an important subgroup of individuals presenting to mental health services, including early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services. Needs and risks are typically assessed without structured methods, which could facilitate consistency and accuracy. Prediction tools, such as OxMIV (Oxford Mental Illness and Violence tool), could provide a structured risk stratification approach, but require external validation in clinical settings. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to validate and update OxMIV in first-episode psychosis and consider its benefit as a complement to clinical assessment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of individuals assessed in two UK EIP services was included. Electronic health records were used to extract predictors and risk judgements made by assessing clinicians. Outcome data involved police and healthcare records for violence perpetration in the 12 months post-assessment. FINDINGS: Of 1145 individuals presenting to EIP services, 131 (11%) perpetrated violence during the 12 month follow-up. OxMIV showed good discrimination (area under the curve 0.75, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.80). Calibration-in-the-large was also good after updating the model constant. Using a 10% cut-off, sensitivity was 71% (95% CI 63% to 80%), specificity 66% (63% to 69%), positive predictive value 22% (19% to 24%) and negative predictive value 95% (93% to 96%). In contrast, clinical judgement sensitivity was 40% and specificity 89%. Decision curve analysis showed net benefit of OxMIV over comparison approaches. CONCLUSIONS: OxMIV performed well in this real-world validation, with improved sensitivity compared with unstructured assessments. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Structured tools to assess violence risk, such as OxMIV, have potential in first-episode psychosis to support a stratified approach to allocating non-harmful interventions to individuals who may benefit from the largest absolute risk reduction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10335427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103354272023-08-21 Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV) Whiting, Daniel Mallett, Sue Lennox, Belinda Fazel, Seena BMJ Ment Health Adult Mental Health BACKGROUND: Violence perpetration is a key outcome to prevent for an important subgroup of individuals presenting to mental health services, including early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services. Needs and risks are typically assessed without structured methods, which could facilitate consistency and accuracy. Prediction tools, such as OxMIV (Oxford Mental Illness and Violence tool), could provide a structured risk stratification approach, but require external validation in clinical settings. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to validate and update OxMIV in first-episode psychosis and consider its benefit as a complement to clinical assessment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of individuals assessed in two UK EIP services was included. Electronic health records were used to extract predictors and risk judgements made by assessing clinicians. Outcome data involved police and healthcare records for violence perpetration in the 12 months post-assessment. FINDINGS: Of 1145 individuals presenting to EIP services, 131 (11%) perpetrated violence during the 12 month follow-up. OxMIV showed good discrimination (area under the curve 0.75, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.80). Calibration-in-the-large was also good after updating the model constant. Using a 10% cut-off, sensitivity was 71% (95% CI 63% to 80%), specificity 66% (63% to 69%), positive predictive value 22% (19% to 24%) and negative predictive value 95% (93% to 96%). In contrast, clinical judgement sensitivity was 40% and specificity 89%. Decision curve analysis showed net benefit of OxMIV over comparison approaches. CONCLUSIONS: OxMIV performed well in this real-world validation, with improved sensitivity compared with unstructured assessments. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Structured tools to assess violence risk, such as OxMIV, have potential in first-episode psychosis to support a stratified approach to allocating non-harmful interventions to individuals who may benefit from the largest absolute risk reduction. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10335427/ /pubmed/37316256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2022-300634 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Adult Mental Health Whiting, Daniel Mallett, Sue Lennox, Belinda Fazel, Seena Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV) |
title | Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV) |
title_full | Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV) |
title_fullStr | Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV) |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV) |
title_short | Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV) |
title_sort | assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (oxmiv) |
topic | Adult Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2022-300634 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitingdaniel assessingviolenceriskinfirstepisodepsychosisexternalvalidationupdatingandnetbenefitofapredictiontooloxmiv AT mallettsue assessingviolenceriskinfirstepisodepsychosisexternalvalidationupdatingandnetbenefitofapredictiontooloxmiv AT lennoxbelinda assessingviolenceriskinfirstepisodepsychosisexternalvalidationupdatingandnetbenefitofapredictiontooloxmiv AT fazelseena assessingviolenceriskinfirstepisodepsychosisexternalvalidationupdatingandnetbenefitofapredictiontooloxmiv |