Cargando…

Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV)

BACKGROUND: Violence perpetration is a key outcome to prevent for an important subgroup of individuals presenting to mental health services, including early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services. Needs and risks are typically assessed without structured methods, which could facilitate consistency...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whiting, Daniel, Mallett, Sue, Lennox, Belinda, Fazel, Seena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2022-300634
_version_ 1785070997432434688
author Whiting, Daniel
Mallett, Sue
Lennox, Belinda
Fazel, Seena
author_facet Whiting, Daniel
Mallett, Sue
Lennox, Belinda
Fazel, Seena
author_sort Whiting, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Violence perpetration is a key outcome to prevent for an important subgroup of individuals presenting to mental health services, including early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services. Needs and risks are typically assessed without structured methods, which could facilitate consistency and accuracy. Prediction tools, such as OxMIV (Oxford Mental Illness and Violence tool), could provide a structured risk stratification approach, but require external validation in clinical settings. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to validate and update OxMIV in first-episode psychosis and consider its benefit as a complement to clinical assessment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of individuals assessed in two UK EIP services was included. Electronic health records were used to extract predictors and risk judgements made by assessing clinicians. Outcome data involved police and healthcare records for violence perpetration in the 12 months post-assessment. FINDINGS: Of 1145 individuals presenting to EIP services, 131 (11%) perpetrated violence during the 12 month follow-up. OxMIV showed good discrimination (area under the curve 0.75, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.80). Calibration-in-the-large was also good after updating the model constant. Using a 10% cut-off, sensitivity was 71% (95% CI 63% to 80%), specificity 66% (63% to 69%), positive predictive value 22% (19% to 24%) and negative predictive value 95% (93% to 96%). In contrast, clinical judgement sensitivity was 40% and specificity 89%. Decision curve analysis showed net benefit of OxMIV over comparison approaches. CONCLUSIONS: OxMIV performed well in this real-world validation, with improved sensitivity compared with unstructured assessments. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Structured tools to assess violence risk, such as OxMIV, have potential in first-episode psychosis to support a stratified approach to allocating non-harmful interventions to individuals who may benefit from the largest absolute risk reduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10335427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103354272023-08-21 Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV) Whiting, Daniel Mallett, Sue Lennox, Belinda Fazel, Seena BMJ Ment Health Adult Mental Health BACKGROUND: Violence perpetration is a key outcome to prevent for an important subgroup of individuals presenting to mental health services, including early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services. Needs and risks are typically assessed without structured methods, which could facilitate consistency and accuracy. Prediction tools, such as OxMIV (Oxford Mental Illness and Violence tool), could provide a structured risk stratification approach, but require external validation in clinical settings. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to validate and update OxMIV in first-episode psychosis and consider its benefit as a complement to clinical assessment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of individuals assessed in two UK EIP services was included. Electronic health records were used to extract predictors and risk judgements made by assessing clinicians. Outcome data involved police and healthcare records for violence perpetration in the 12 months post-assessment. FINDINGS: Of 1145 individuals presenting to EIP services, 131 (11%) perpetrated violence during the 12 month follow-up. OxMIV showed good discrimination (area under the curve 0.75, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.80). Calibration-in-the-large was also good after updating the model constant. Using a 10% cut-off, sensitivity was 71% (95% CI 63% to 80%), specificity 66% (63% to 69%), positive predictive value 22% (19% to 24%) and negative predictive value 95% (93% to 96%). In contrast, clinical judgement sensitivity was 40% and specificity 89%. Decision curve analysis showed net benefit of OxMIV over comparison approaches. CONCLUSIONS: OxMIV performed well in this real-world validation, with improved sensitivity compared with unstructured assessments. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Structured tools to assess violence risk, such as OxMIV, have potential in first-episode psychosis to support a stratified approach to allocating non-harmful interventions to individuals who may benefit from the largest absolute risk reduction. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10335427/ /pubmed/37316256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2022-300634 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Adult Mental Health
Whiting, Daniel
Mallett, Sue
Lennox, Belinda
Fazel, Seena
Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV)
title Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV)
title_full Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV)
title_fullStr Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV)
title_full_unstemmed Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV)
title_short Assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (OxMIV)
title_sort assessing violence risk in first-episode psychosis: external validation, updating and net benefit of a prediction tool (oxmiv)
topic Adult Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2022-300634
work_keys_str_mv AT whitingdaniel assessingviolenceriskinfirstepisodepsychosisexternalvalidationupdatingandnetbenefitofapredictiontooloxmiv
AT mallettsue assessingviolenceriskinfirstepisodepsychosisexternalvalidationupdatingandnetbenefitofapredictiontooloxmiv
AT lennoxbelinda assessingviolenceriskinfirstepisodepsychosisexternalvalidationupdatingandnetbenefitofapredictiontooloxmiv
AT fazelseena assessingviolenceriskinfirstepisodepsychosisexternalvalidationupdatingandnetbenefitofapredictiontooloxmiv