Cargando…

Patient, hospital and environmental costs of unnecessary bloodwork: capturing the triple bottom line of inappropriate care in general surgery patients

OBJECTIVE: To characterise the extent of unnecessary care in general surgery inpatients using a triple bottom line approach. DESIGN: Patients with uncomplicated acute surgical conditions were retrospectively evaluated for unnecessary bloodwork according to the triple bottom line, quantifying the imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spoyalo, Karina, Lalande, Annie, Rizan, Chantelle, Park, Sophia, Simons, Janet, Dawe, Philip, Brown, Carl J, Lillywhite, Robert, MacNeill, Andrea J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37402596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002316
_version_ 1785071000515248128
author Spoyalo, Karina
Lalande, Annie
Rizan, Chantelle
Park, Sophia
Simons, Janet
Dawe, Philip
Brown, Carl J
Lillywhite, Robert
MacNeill, Andrea J
author_facet Spoyalo, Karina
Lalande, Annie
Rizan, Chantelle
Park, Sophia
Simons, Janet
Dawe, Philip
Brown, Carl J
Lillywhite, Robert
MacNeill, Andrea J
author_sort Spoyalo, Karina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To characterise the extent of unnecessary care in general surgery inpatients using a triple bottom line approach. DESIGN: Patients with uncomplicated acute surgical conditions were retrospectively evaluated for unnecessary bloodwork according to the triple bottom line, quantifying the impacts on patients, healthcare costs and greenhouse gas emissions. The carbon footprint of common laboratory investigations was estimated using PAS2050 methodology, including emissions generated from the production, transport, processing and disposal of consumable goods and reagents. SETTING: Single-centre tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, gallstone pancreatitis and adhesive small bowel obstruction were included in the study. 304 patients met inclusion criteria and 83 were randomly selected for in-depth chart review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In each patient population, the extent of over-investigation was determined by comparing ordered laboratory investigations against previously developed consensus recommendations. The quantity of unnecessary bloodwork was measured by number of phlebotomies, tests and blood volume in addition to healthcare costs and greenhouse gas emissions. RESULTS: 76% (63/83) of evaluated patients underwent unnecessary bloodwork resulting in a mean of 1.84 phlebotomies, 4.4 blood vials, 16.5 tests and 18 mL of blood loss per patient. The hospital and environmental cost of these unnecessary activities was $C5235 and 61 kg CO(2)e (974 g CO(2)e per person), respectively. The carbon footprint of a common set of investigations (complete blood count, differential, creatinine, urea, sodium, potassium) was 332 g CO(2)e. Adding a liver panel (liver enzymes, bilirubin, albumin, international normalised ratio/partial thromboplastin time) resulted in an additional 462 g CO(2)e. CONCLUSIONS: We found considerable overuse of laboratory investigations among general surgery patients admitted with uncomplicated acute surgical conditions resulting in unnecessary burden to patients, hospitals and the environment. This study identifies an opportunity for resource stewardship and exemplifies a comprehensive approach to quality improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10335441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103354412023-07-12 Patient, hospital and environmental costs of unnecessary bloodwork: capturing the triple bottom line of inappropriate care in general surgery patients Spoyalo, Karina Lalande, Annie Rizan, Chantelle Park, Sophia Simons, Janet Dawe, Philip Brown, Carl J Lillywhite, Robert MacNeill, Andrea J BMJ Open Qual Original Research OBJECTIVE: To characterise the extent of unnecessary care in general surgery inpatients using a triple bottom line approach. DESIGN: Patients with uncomplicated acute surgical conditions were retrospectively evaluated for unnecessary bloodwork according to the triple bottom line, quantifying the impacts on patients, healthcare costs and greenhouse gas emissions. The carbon footprint of common laboratory investigations was estimated using PAS2050 methodology, including emissions generated from the production, transport, processing and disposal of consumable goods and reagents. SETTING: Single-centre tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, gallstone pancreatitis and adhesive small bowel obstruction were included in the study. 304 patients met inclusion criteria and 83 were randomly selected for in-depth chart review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In each patient population, the extent of over-investigation was determined by comparing ordered laboratory investigations against previously developed consensus recommendations. The quantity of unnecessary bloodwork was measured by number of phlebotomies, tests and blood volume in addition to healthcare costs and greenhouse gas emissions. RESULTS: 76% (63/83) of evaluated patients underwent unnecessary bloodwork resulting in a mean of 1.84 phlebotomies, 4.4 blood vials, 16.5 tests and 18 mL of blood loss per patient. The hospital and environmental cost of these unnecessary activities was $C5235 and 61 kg CO(2)e (974 g CO(2)e per person), respectively. The carbon footprint of a common set of investigations (complete blood count, differential, creatinine, urea, sodium, potassium) was 332 g CO(2)e. Adding a liver panel (liver enzymes, bilirubin, albumin, international normalised ratio/partial thromboplastin time) resulted in an additional 462 g CO(2)e. CONCLUSIONS: We found considerable overuse of laboratory investigations among general surgery patients admitted with uncomplicated acute surgical conditions resulting in unnecessary burden to patients, hospitals and the environment. This study identifies an opportunity for resource stewardship and exemplifies a comprehensive approach to quality improvement. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10335441/ /pubmed/37402596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002316 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Spoyalo, Karina
Lalande, Annie
Rizan, Chantelle
Park, Sophia
Simons, Janet
Dawe, Philip
Brown, Carl J
Lillywhite, Robert
MacNeill, Andrea J
Patient, hospital and environmental costs of unnecessary bloodwork: capturing the triple bottom line of inappropriate care in general surgery patients
title Patient, hospital and environmental costs of unnecessary bloodwork: capturing the triple bottom line of inappropriate care in general surgery patients
title_full Patient, hospital and environmental costs of unnecessary bloodwork: capturing the triple bottom line of inappropriate care in general surgery patients
title_fullStr Patient, hospital and environmental costs of unnecessary bloodwork: capturing the triple bottom line of inappropriate care in general surgery patients
title_full_unstemmed Patient, hospital and environmental costs of unnecessary bloodwork: capturing the triple bottom line of inappropriate care in general surgery patients
title_short Patient, hospital and environmental costs of unnecessary bloodwork: capturing the triple bottom line of inappropriate care in general surgery patients
title_sort patient, hospital and environmental costs of unnecessary bloodwork: capturing the triple bottom line of inappropriate care in general surgery patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37402596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002316
work_keys_str_mv AT spoyalokarina patienthospitalandenvironmentalcostsofunnecessarybloodworkcapturingthetriplebottomlineofinappropriatecareingeneralsurgerypatients
AT lalandeannie patienthospitalandenvironmentalcostsofunnecessarybloodworkcapturingthetriplebottomlineofinappropriatecareingeneralsurgerypatients
AT rizanchantelle patienthospitalandenvironmentalcostsofunnecessarybloodworkcapturingthetriplebottomlineofinappropriatecareingeneralsurgerypatients
AT parksophia patienthospitalandenvironmentalcostsofunnecessarybloodworkcapturingthetriplebottomlineofinappropriatecareingeneralsurgerypatients
AT simonsjanet patienthospitalandenvironmentalcostsofunnecessarybloodworkcapturingthetriplebottomlineofinappropriatecareingeneralsurgerypatients
AT dawephilip patienthospitalandenvironmentalcostsofunnecessarybloodworkcapturingthetriplebottomlineofinappropriatecareingeneralsurgerypatients
AT browncarlj patienthospitalandenvironmentalcostsofunnecessarybloodworkcapturingthetriplebottomlineofinappropriatecareingeneralsurgerypatients
AT lillywhiterobert patienthospitalandenvironmentalcostsofunnecessarybloodworkcapturingthetriplebottomlineofinappropriatecareingeneralsurgerypatients
AT macneillandreaj patienthospitalandenvironmentalcostsofunnecessarybloodworkcapturingthetriplebottomlineofinappropriatecareingeneralsurgerypatients