Cargando…

Comorbidities in children with cerebral palsy: a single-centre cross-sectional hospital-based study from India

OBJECTIVE: To describe the comorbidities in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and determine the characteristics associated with different impairments. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Tertiary care referral centre in India. PATIENTS: Between April 2018 and May 2022, all children aged 2–18 yea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viswanath, Maya, Jha, Ruchika, Gambhirao, Ankita Dilip, Kurup, Arjun, Badal, Sachendra, Kohli, Sarvesh, Parappil, Parvathi, John, Biju M, Adhikari, Krishna Moorthi, Kovilapu, Uday Bhanu, Sondhi, Vishal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37429681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072365
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To describe the comorbidities in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and determine the characteristics associated with different impairments. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Tertiary care referral centre in India. PATIENTS: Between April 2018 and May 2022, all children aged 2–18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of CP were enrolled by systematic random sampling. Data on antenatal, birth and postnatal risk factors, clinical evaluation and investigations (neuroimaging and genetic/metabolic workup) were recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of the co-occurring impairments was determined using clinical evaluation or investigations as indicated. RESULTS: Of the 436 children screened, 384 participated (spastic CP=214 (55.7%) (spastic hemiplegic=52 (13.5%); spastic diplegia=70 (18.2%); spastic quadriplegia=92 (24%)), dyskinetic CP=58 (15.1%) and mixed CP=110 (28.6%)). A primary antenatal/perinatal/neonatal and postneonatal risk factor was identified in 32 (8.3%), 320 (83.3%) and 26 (6.8%) patients, respectively. Prevalent comorbidities (the test used) included visual impairment (clinical assessment and visual evoked potential)=357/383(93.2%), hearing impairment (brainstem-evoked response audiometry)=113 (30%), no understanding of any communication (MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory)=137 (36%), cognitive impairment (Vineland scale of social maturity)=341 (88.8%), severe gastrointestinal dysfunction (clinical evaluation/interview)=90 (23%), significant pain (non-communicating children’s pain checklist)=230 (60%), epilepsy=245 (64%), drug-resistant epilepsy=163 (42.4%), sleep impairment (Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire)=176/290(60.7%) and behavioural abnormalities (Childhood behaviour checklist)=165 (43%). Overall, hemiparetic and diplegic CP and Gross Motor Function Classification System ≤3 were predictive of lesser co-occurring impairment. CONCLUSION: CP children have a high burden of comorbidities, which increase with increasing functional impairment. This calls for urgent actions to prioritise opportunities to prevent risk factors associated with CP and organise existing resources to identify and manage co-occurring impairments. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2018/07/014819.