Cargando…

Navigating the machine learning pipeline: a scoping review of inpatient delirium prediction models

OBJECTIVES: Early identification of inpatients at risk of developing delirium and implementing preventive measures could avoid up to 40% of delirium cases. Machine learning (ML)-based prediction models may enable risk stratification and targeted intervention, but establishing their current evolution...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strating, Tom, Shafiee Hanjani, Leila, Tornvall, Ida, Hubbard, Ruth, Scott, Ian A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100767
_version_ 1785071031108501504
author Strating, Tom
Shafiee Hanjani, Leila
Tornvall, Ida
Hubbard, Ruth
Scott, Ian A.
author_facet Strating, Tom
Shafiee Hanjani, Leila
Tornvall, Ida
Hubbard, Ruth
Scott, Ian A.
author_sort Strating, Tom
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Early identification of inpatients at risk of developing delirium and implementing preventive measures could avoid up to 40% of delirium cases. Machine learning (ML)-based prediction models may enable risk stratification and targeted intervention, but establishing their current evolutionary status requires a scoping review of recent literature. METHODS: We searched ten databases up to June 2022 for studies of ML-based delirium prediction models. Eligible criteria comprised: use of at least one ML prediction method in an adult hospital inpatient population; published in English; reporting at least one performance measure (area under receiver-operator curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive or negative predictive value). Included models were categorised by their stage of maturation and assessed for performance, utility and user acceptance in clinical practice. RESULTS: Among 921 screened studies, 39 met eligibility criteria. In-silico performance was consistently high (median AUROC: 0.85); however, only six articles (15.4%) reported external validation, revealing degraded performance (median AUROC: 0.75). Three studies (7.7%) of models deployed within clinical workflows reported high accuracy (median AUROC: 0.92) and high user acceptance. DISCUSSION: ML models have potential to identify inpatients at risk of developing delirium before symptom onset. However, few models were externally validated and even fewer underwent prospective evaluation in clinical settings. CONCLUSION: This review confirms a rapidly growing body of research into using ML for predicting delirium risk in hospital settings. Our findings offer insights for both developers and clinicians into strengths and limitations of current ML delirium prediction applications aiming to support but not usurp clinician decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10335592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103355922023-07-12 Navigating the machine learning pipeline: a scoping review of inpatient delirium prediction models Strating, Tom Shafiee Hanjani, Leila Tornvall, Ida Hubbard, Ruth Scott, Ian A. BMJ Health Care Inform Review OBJECTIVES: Early identification of inpatients at risk of developing delirium and implementing preventive measures could avoid up to 40% of delirium cases. Machine learning (ML)-based prediction models may enable risk stratification and targeted intervention, but establishing their current evolutionary status requires a scoping review of recent literature. METHODS: We searched ten databases up to June 2022 for studies of ML-based delirium prediction models. Eligible criteria comprised: use of at least one ML prediction method in an adult hospital inpatient population; published in English; reporting at least one performance measure (area under receiver-operator curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive or negative predictive value). Included models were categorised by their stage of maturation and assessed for performance, utility and user acceptance in clinical practice. RESULTS: Among 921 screened studies, 39 met eligibility criteria. In-silico performance was consistently high (median AUROC: 0.85); however, only six articles (15.4%) reported external validation, revealing degraded performance (median AUROC: 0.75). Three studies (7.7%) of models deployed within clinical workflows reported high accuracy (median AUROC: 0.92) and high user acceptance. DISCUSSION: ML models have potential to identify inpatients at risk of developing delirium before symptom onset. However, few models were externally validated and even fewer underwent prospective evaluation in clinical settings. CONCLUSION: This review confirms a rapidly growing body of research into using ML for predicting delirium risk in hospital settings. Our findings offer insights for both developers and clinicians into strengths and limitations of current ML delirium prediction applications aiming to support but not usurp clinician decision-making. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10335592/ /pubmed/37407226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100767 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Strating, Tom
Shafiee Hanjani, Leila
Tornvall, Ida
Hubbard, Ruth
Scott, Ian A.
Navigating the machine learning pipeline: a scoping review of inpatient delirium prediction models
title Navigating the machine learning pipeline: a scoping review of inpatient delirium prediction models
title_full Navigating the machine learning pipeline: a scoping review of inpatient delirium prediction models
title_fullStr Navigating the machine learning pipeline: a scoping review of inpatient delirium prediction models
title_full_unstemmed Navigating the machine learning pipeline: a scoping review of inpatient delirium prediction models
title_short Navigating the machine learning pipeline: a scoping review of inpatient delirium prediction models
title_sort navigating the machine learning pipeline: a scoping review of inpatient delirium prediction models
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37407226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100767
work_keys_str_mv AT stratingtom navigatingthemachinelearningpipelineascopingreviewofinpatientdeliriumpredictionmodels
AT shafieehanjanileila navigatingthemachinelearningpipelineascopingreviewofinpatientdeliriumpredictionmodels
AT tornvallida navigatingthemachinelearningpipelineascopingreviewofinpatientdeliriumpredictionmodels
AT hubbardruth navigatingthemachinelearningpipelineascopingreviewofinpatientdeliriumpredictionmodels
AT scottiana navigatingthemachinelearningpipelineascopingreviewofinpatientdeliriumpredictionmodels