Cargando…
Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening
BACKGROUND: Machine learning methods are used in the classification of various cardiovascular diseases through ECG data analysis. The concept of varying subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillator (S‐ICD) eligibility, owing to the dynamicity of ECG signals, has been introduced before. There are p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36920649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.13056 |
_version_ | 1785071036816949248 |
---|---|
author | ElRefai, Mohamed Abouelasaad, Mohamed Wiles, Benedict M. Dunn, Anthony J. Coniglio, Stefano Zemkoho, Alain B. Morgan, John Roberts, Paul R. |
author_facet | ElRefai, Mohamed Abouelasaad, Mohamed Wiles, Benedict M. Dunn, Anthony J. Coniglio, Stefano Zemkoho, Alain B. Morgan, John Roberts, Paul R. |
author_sort | ElRefai, Mohamed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Machine learning methods are used in the classification of various cardiovascular diseases through ECG data analysis. The concept of varying subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillator (S‐ICD) eligibility, owing to the dynamicity of ECG signals, has been introduced before. There are practical limitations to acquiring longer durations of ECG signals for S‐ICD screening. This study explored the potential use of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. A deep learning tool was used to provide descriptive analysis of the T:R ratios over 24 h recordings of S‐ICD vectors. Spearman's rank correlation test was used to compare the results statistically to those of a “gold standard” S‐ICD simulator. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients (mean age: 63.7 ± 5.2 years, 71.4% male) were recruited and 28 vectors were analyzed. Mean T:R, standard deviation of T:R, and favorable ratio time (FVR)—a new concept introduced in this study—for all vectors combined were 0.21 ± 0.11, 0.08 ± 0.04, and 79 ± 30%, respectively. There were statistically significant strong correlations between the outcomes of our novel tool and the S‐ICD simulator (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Deep learning methods could provide a practical software solution to analyze data acquired for longer durations than current S‐ICD screening practices. This could help select patients better suited for S‐ICD therapy as well as guide vector selection in S‐ICD eligible patients. Further work is needed before this could be translated into clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10335624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103356242023-07-12 Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening ElRefai, Mohamed Abouelasaad, Mohamed Wiles, Benedict M. Dunn, Anthony J. Coniglio, Stefano Zemkoho, Alain B. Morgan, John Roberts, Paul R. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Machine learning methods are used in the classification of various cardiovascular diseases through ECG data analysis. The concept of varying subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillator (S‐ICD) eligibility, owing to the dynamicity of ECG signals, has been introduced before. There are practical limitations to acquiring longer durations of ECG signals for S‐ICD screening. This study explored the potential use of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. A deep learning tool was used to provide descriptive analysis of the T:R ratios over 24 h recordings of S‐ICD vectors. Spearman's rank correlation test was used to compare the results statistically to those of a “gold standard” S‐ICD simulator. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients (mean age: 63.7 ± 5.2 years, 71.4% male) were recruited and 28 vectors were analyzed. Mean T:R, standard deviation of T:R, and favorable ratio time (FVR)—a new concept introduced in this study—for all vectors combined were 0.21 ± 0.11, 0.08 ± 0.04, and 79 ± 30%, respectively. There were statistically significant strong correlations between the outcomes of our novel tool and the S‐ICD simulator (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Deep learning methods could provide a practical software solution to analyze data acquired for longer durations than current S‐ICD screening practices. This could help select patients better suited for S‐ICD therapy as well as guide vector selection in S‐ICD eligible patients. Further work is needed before this could be translated into clinical practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10335624/ /pubmed/36920649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.13056 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles ElRefai, Mohamed Abouelasaad, Mohamed Wiles, Benedict M. Dunn, Anthony J. Coniglio, Stefano Zemkoho, Alain B. Morgan, John Roberts, Paul R. Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening |
title | Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening |
title_full | Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening |
title_fullStr | Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening |
title_short | Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening |
title_sort | correlation analysis of deep learning methods in s‐icd screening |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36920649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.13056 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elrefaimohamed correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening AT abouelasaadmohamed correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening AT wilesbenedictm correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening AT dunnanthonyj correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening AT conigliostefano correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening AT zemkohoalainb correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening AT morganjohn correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening AT robertspaulr correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening |