Cargando…

Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening

BACKGROUND: Machine learning methods are used in the classification of various cardiovascular diseases through ECG data analysis. The concept of varying subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillator (S‐ICD) eligibility, owing to the dynamicity of ECG signals, has been introduced before. There are p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ElRefai, Mohamed, Abouelasaad, Mohamed, Wiles, Benedict M., Dunn, Anthony J., Coniglio, Stefano, Zemkoho, Alain B., Morgan, John, Roberts, Paul R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36920649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.13056
_version_ 1785071036816949248
author ElRefai, Mohamed
Abouelasaad, Mohamed
Wiles, Benedict M.
Dunn, Anthony J.
Coniglio, Stefano
Zemkoho, Alain B.
Morgan, John
Roberts, Paul R.
author_facet ElRefai, Mohamed
Abouelasaad, Mohamed
Wiles, Benedict M.
Dunn, Anthony J.
Coniglio, Stefano
Zemkoho, Alain B.
Morgan, John
Roberts, Paul R.
author_sort ElRefai, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Machine learning methods are used in the classification of various cardiovascular diseases through ECG data analysis. The concept of varying subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillator (S‐ICD) eligibility, owing to the dynamicity of ECG signals, has been introduced before. There are practical limitations to acquiring longer durations of ECG signals for S‐ICD screening. This study explored the potential use of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. A deep learning tool was used to provide descriptive analysis of the T:R ratios over 24 h recordings of S‐ICD vectors. Spearman's rank correlation test was used to compare the results statistically to those of a “gold standard” S‐ICD simulator. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients (mean age: 63.7 ± 5.2 years, 71.4% male) were recruited and 28 vectors were analyzed. Mean T:R, standard deviation of T:R, and favorable ratio time (FVR)—a new concept introduced in this study—for all vectors combined were 0.21 ± 0.11, 0.08 ± 0.04, and 79 ± 30%, respectively. There were statistically significant strong correlations between the outcomes of our novel tool and the S‐ICD simulator (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Deep learning methods could provide a practical software solution to analyze data acquired for longer durations than current S‐ICD screening practices. This could help select patients better suited for S‐ICD therapy as well as guide vector selection in S‐ICD eligible patients. Further work is needed before this could be translated into clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10335624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103356242023-07-12 Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening ElRefai, Mohamed Abouelasaad, Mohamed Wiles, Benedict M. Dunn, Anthony J. Coniglio, Stefano Zemkoho, Alain B. Morgan, John Roberts, Paul R. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Machine learning methods are used in the classification of various cardiovascular diseases through ECG data analysis. The concept of varying subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillator (S‐ICD) eligibility, owing to the dynamicity of ECG signals, has been introduced before. There are practical limitations to acquiring longer durations of ECG signals for S‐ICD screening. This study explored the potential use of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. A deep learning tool was used to provide descriptive analysis of the T:R ratios over 24 h recordings of S‐ICD vectors. Spearman's rank correlation test was used to compare the results statistically to those of a “gold standard” S‐ICD simulator. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients (mean age: 63.7 ± 5.2 years, 71.4% male) were recruited and 28 vectors were analyzed. Mean T:R, standard deviation of T:R, and favorable ratio time (FVR)—a new concept introduced in this study—for all vectors combined were 0.21 ± 0.11, 0.08 ± 0.04, and 79 ± 30%, respectively. There were statistically significant strong correlations between the outcomes of our novel tool and the S‐ICD simulator (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Deep learning methods could provide a practical software solution to analyze data acquired for longer durations than current S‐ICD screening practices. This could help select patients better suited for S‐ICD therapy as well as guide vector selection in S‐ICD eligible patients. Further work is needed before this could be translated into clinical practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10335624/ /pubmed/36920649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.13056 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
ElRefai, Mohamed
Abouelasaad, Mohamed
Wiles, Benedict M.
Dunn, Anthony J.
Coniglio, Stefano
Zemkoho, Alain B.
Morgan, John
Roberts, Paul R.
Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening
title Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening
title_full Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening
title_fullStr Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening
title_full_unstemmed Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening
title_short Correlation analysis of deep learning methods in S‐ICD screening
title_sort correlation analysis of deep learning methods in s‐icd screening
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36920649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.13056
work_keys_str_mv AT elrefaimohamed correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening
AT abouelasaadmohamed correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening
AT wilesbenedictm correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening
AT dunnanthonyj correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening
AT conigliostefano correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening
AT zemkohoalainb correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening
AT morganjohn correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening
AT robertspaulr correlationanalysisofdeeplearningmethodsinsicdscreening