Cargando…

Does cardiac imaging surveillance strategy influence outcomes in patients with early breast cancer?

BACKGROUND: Many patients with breast cancer receive therapies with the potential to cause cardiotoxicity. Echocardiography and multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scans are the most used modalities to assess cardiac function during treatment in high-risk patients; however, the optimal imaging strateg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Kai Yi, Parent, Sarah, Xu, Lingyu, Yaqoob, Maryam, Black, W. Allan, Shysh, Andrea, Mackey, John R., King, Karen, Becher, Harald, Pituskin, Edith, Paterson, D. Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1168651
_version_ 1785071082370236416
author Wu, Kai Yi
Parent, Sarah
Xu, Lingyu
Yaqoob, Maryam
Black, W. Allan
Shysh, Andrea
Mackey, John R.
King, Karen
Becher, Harald
Pituskin, Edith
Paterson, D. Ian
author_facet Wu, Kai Yi
Parent, Sarah
Xu, Lingyu
Yaqoob, Maryam
Black, W. Allan
Shysh, Andrea
Mackey, John R.
King, Karen
Becher, Harald
Pituskin, Edith
Paterson, D. Ian
author_sort Wu, Kai Yi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many patients with breast cancer receive therapies with the potential to cause cardiotoxicity. Echocardiography and multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scans are the most used modalities to assess cardiac function during treatment in high-risk patients; however, the optimal imaging strategy and the impact on outcome are unknown. METHODS: Consecutive patients with stage 0-3 breast cancer undergoing pre-treatment echocardiography or MUGA were identified from a tertiary care cancer center from 2010-2019. Demographics, medical history, imaging data and clinical events were collected from hospital charts and administrative databases. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause death or heart failure event. Clinical and imaging predictors of outcome were evaluated on univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: 1028 patients underwent pre-treatment MUGA and 1032 underwent echocardiography. The groups were well matched for most clinical characteristics except patients undergoing MUGA were younger, had more stage 3 breast cancer and more HER2 over-expressing and triple negative cases. Routine follow-up cardiac imaging scan was obtained in 39.3% of patients with MUGA and 38.0% with echocardiography. During a median follow-up of 2448 (1489, 3160) days, there were 194 deaths, including 7 cardiovascular deaths, and 28 heart failure events with no difference in events between the MUGA and echocardiography groups. There were no imaging predictors of the primary composite outcome or cardiac events. Patients without follow-up imaging had similar adjusted risk for the composite outcome compared to those with imaging follow-up, hazard ratio 0.8 (95% confidence interval 0.5,1.3), p=0.457. CONCLUSION: The selection of pretreatment echocardiography or MUGA did not influence the risk of death or heart failure in patients with early breast cancer. Many patients did not have any follow-up cardiac imaging and did not suffer worse outcomes. Cardiovascular deaths and heart failure event rates were low and the value of long-term cardiac imaging surveillance should be further evaluated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10335844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103358442023-07-12 Does cardiac imaging surveillance strategy influence outcomes in patients with early breast cancer? Wu, Kai Yi Parent, Sarah Xu, Lingyu Yaqoob, Maryam Black, W. Allan Shysh, Andrea Mackey, John R. King, Karen Becher, Harald Pituskin, Edith Paterson, D. Ian Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Many patients with breast cancer receive therapies with the potential to cause cardiotoxicity. Echocardiography and multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scans are the most used modalities to assess cardiac function during treatment in high-risk patients; however, the optimal imaging strategy and the impact on outcome are unknown. METHODS: Consecutive patients with stage 0-3 breast cancer undergoing pre-treatment echocardiography or MUGA were identified from a tertiary care cancer center from 2010-2019. Demographics, medical history, imaging data and clinical events were collected from hospital charts and administrative databases. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause death or heart failure event. Clinical and imaging predictors of outcome were evaluated on univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: 1028 patients underwent pre-treatment MUGA and 1032 underwent echocardiography. The groups were well matched for most clinical characteristics except patients undergoing MUGA were younger, had more stage 3 breast cancer and more HER2 over-expressing and triple negative cases. Routine follow-up cardiac imaging scan was obtained in 39.3% of patients with MUGA and 38.0% with echocardiography. During a median follow-up of 2448 (1489, 3160) days, there were 194 deaths, including 7 cardiovascular deaths, and 28 heart failure events with no difference in events between the MUGA and echocardiography groups. There were no imaging predictors of the primary composite outcome or cardiac events. Patients without follow-up imaging had similar adjusted risk for the composite outcome compared to those with imaging follow-up, hazard ratio 0.8 (95% confidence interval 0.5,1.3), p=0.457. CONCLUSION: The selection of pretreatment echocardiography or MUGA did not influence the risk of death or heart failure in patients with early breast cancer. Many patients did not have any follow-up cardiac imaging and did not suffer worse outcomes. Cardiovascular deaths and heart failure event rates were low and the value of long-term cardiac imaging surveillance should be further evaluated. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10335844/ /pubmed/37441421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1168651 Text en Copyright © 2023 Wu, Parent, Xu, Yaqoob, Black, Shysh, Mackey, King, Becher, Pituskin and Paterson https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wu, Kai Yi
Parent, Sarah
Xu, Lingyu
Yaqoob, Maryam
Black, W. Allan
Shysh, Andrea
Mackey, John R.
King, Karen
Becher, Harald
Pituskin, Edith
Paterson, D. Ian
Does cardiac imaging surveillance strategy influence outcomes in patients with early breast cancer?
title Does cardiac imaging surveillance strategy influence outcomes in patients with early breast cancer?
title_full Does cardiac imaging surveillance strategy influence outcomes in patients with early breast cancer?
title_fullStr Does cardiac imaging surveillance strategy influence outcomes in patients with early breast cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Does cardiac imaging surveillance strategy influence outcomes in patients with early breast cancer?
title_short Does cardiac imaging surveillance strategy influence outcomes in patients with early breast cancer?
title_sort does cardiac imaging surveillance strategy influence outcomes in patients with early breast cancer?
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10335844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37441421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1168651
work_keys_str_mv AT wukaiyi doescardiacimagingsurveillancestrategyinfluenceoutcomesinpatientswithearlybreastcancer
AT parentsarah doescardiacimagingsurveillancestrategyinfluenceoutcomesinpatientswithearlybreastcancer
AT xulingyu doescardiacimagingsurveillancestrategyinfluenceoutcomesinpatientswithearlybreastcancer
AT yaqoobmaryam doescardiacimagingsurveillancestrategyinfluenceoutcomesinpatientswithearlybreastcancer
AT blackwallan doescardiacimagingsurveillancestrategyinfluenceoutcomesinpatientswithearlybreastcancer
AT shyshandrea doescardiacimagingsurveillancestrategyinfluenceoutcomesinpatientswithearlybreastcancer
AT mackeyjohnr doescardiacimagingsurveillancestrategyinfluenceoutcomesinpatientswithearlybreastcancer
AT kingkaren doescardiacimagingsurveillancestrategyinfluenceoutcomesinpatientswithearlybreastcancer
AT becherharald doescardiacimagingsurveillancestrategyinfluenceoutcomesinpatientswithearlybreastcancer
AT pituskinedith doescardiacimagingsurveillancestrategyinfluenceoutcomesinpatientswithearlybreastcancer
AT patersondian doescardiacimagingsurveillancestrategyinfluenceoutcomesinpatientswithearlybreastcancer