Cargando…
A systematic review of questionnaires measuring asthma control in children in a primary care population
Several questionnaires are used to measure asthma control in children. The most appropriate tool for use in primary care is not defined. In this systematic review, we evaluated questionnaires used to measure asthma control in children in primary care and determined their usefulness in asthma managem...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37433825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-023-00344-9 |
_version_ | 1785071113672327168 |
---|---|
author | Bousema, Sara Bohnen, Arthur M. Bindels, Patrick J. E. Elshout, Gijs |
author_facet | Bousema, Sara Bohnen, Arthur M. Bindels, Patrick J. E. Elshout, Gijs |
author_sort | Bousema, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several questionnaires are used to measure asthma control in children. The most appropriate tool for use in primary care is not defined. In this systematic review, we evaluated questionnaires used to measure asthma control in children in primary care and determined their usefulness in asthma management. Searches were performed in the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases with end date 24 June 2022. The study population comprised children aged 5–18 years with asthma. Three reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed, using the COSMIN criteria for the measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Studies conducted in primary care were included if a minimum of two questionnaires were compared. Studies in secondary or tertiary care and studies of quality-of-life questionnaires were excluded. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Five publications were included: four observational studies and one sub-study of a randomized controlled trial. A total of 806 children were included (aged 5–18 years). We evaluated the Asthma Control Test (ACT), childhood Asthma Control Test (c-ACT), Asthma APGAR system, NAEPP criteria and Royal College of Physicians’ ‘3 questions’ (RCP3Q). These questionnaires assess different symptoms and domains. The quality of most of the studies was rated ‘intermediate’ or ‘poor’. The majority of the evaluated questionnaires do not show substantial agreement with one another, which makes a comparison challenging. Based on the current review, we suggest that the Asthma APGAR system seems promising as a questionnaire for determining asthma control in children in primary care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10336001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103360012023-07-13 A systematic review of questionnaires measuring asthma control in children in a primary care population Bousema, Sara Bohnen, Arthur M. Bindels, Patrick J. E. Elshout, Gijs NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Review Article Several questionnaires are used to measure asthma control in children. The most appropriate tool for use in primary care is not defined. In this systematic review, we evaluated questionnaires used to measure asthma control in children in primary care and determined their usefulness in asthma management. Searches were performed in the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases with end date 24 June 2022. The study population comprised children aged 5–18 years with asthma. Three reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed, using the COSMIN criteria for the measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Studies conducted in primary care were included if a minimum of two questionnaires were compared. Studies in secondary or tertiary care and studies of quality-of-life questionnaires were excluded. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Five publications were included: four observational studies and one sub-study of a randomized controlled trial. A total of 806 children were included (aged 5–18 years). We evaluated the Asthma Control Test (ACT), childhood Asthma Control Test (c-ACT), Asthma APGAR system, NAEPP criteria and Royal College of Physicians’ ‘3 questions’ (RCP3Q). These questionnaires assess different symptoms and domains. The quality of most of the studies was rated ‘intermediate’ or ‘poor’. The majority of the evaluated questionnaires do not show substantial agreement with one another, which makes a comparison challenging. Based on the current review, we suggest that the Asthma APGAR system seems promising as a questionnaire for determining asthma control in children in primary care. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10336001/ /pubmed/37433825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-023-00344-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Bousema, Sara Bohnen, Arthur M. Bindels, Patrick J. E. Elshout, Gijs A systematic review of questionnaires measuring asthma control in children in a primary care population |
title | A systematic review of questionnaires measuring asthma control in children in a primary care population |
title_full | A systematic review of questionnaires measuring asthma control in children in a primary care population |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of questionnaires measuring asthma control in children in a primary care population |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of questionnaires measuring asthma control in children in a primary care population |
title_short | A systematic review of questionnaires measuring asthma control in children in a primary care population |
title_sort | systematic review of questionnaires measuring asthma control in children in a primary care population |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37433825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41533-023-00344-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bousemasara asystematicreviewofquestionnairesmeasuringasthmacontrolinchildreninaprimarycarepopulation AT bohnenarthurm asystematicreviewofquestionnairesmeasuringasthmacontrolinchildreninaprimarycarepopulation AT bindelspatrickje asystematicreviewofquestionnairesmeasuringasthmacontrolinchildreninaprimarycarepopulation AT elshoutgijs asystematicreviewofquestionnairesmeasuringasthmacontrolinchildreninaprimarycarepopulation AT bousemasara systematicreviewofquestionnairesmeasuringasthmacontrolinchildreninaprimarycarepopulation AT bohnenarthurm systematicreviewofquestionnairesmeasuringasthmacontrolinchildreninaprimarycarepopulation AT bindelspatrickje systematicreviewofquestionnairesmeasuringasthmacontrolinchildreninaprimarycarepopulation AT elshoutgijs systematicreviewofquestionnairesmeasuringasthmacontrolinchildreninaprimarycarepopulation |