Cargando…

A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact

Novel malaria vector control strategies targeting the odour-orientation of mosquitoes during host-seeking, such as ‘attract-and-kill’ or ‘push-and-pull’, have been suggested as complementary tools to indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticidal nets. These would be particularly beneficial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fillinger, Ulrike, Denz, Adrian, Njoroge, Margaret M., Tambwe, Mohamed M., Takken, Willem, van Loon, Joop J. A., Moore, Sarah J., Saddler, Adam, Chitnis, Nakul, Hiscox, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37433881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38463-5
_version_ 1785071147119804416
author Fillinger, Ulrike
Denz, Adrian
Njoroge, Margaret M.
Tambwe, Mohamed M.
Takken, Willem
van Loon, Joop J. A.
Moore, Sarah J.
Saddler, Adam
Chitnis, Nakul
Hiscox, Alexandra
author_facet Fillinger, Ulrike
Denz, Adrian
Njoroge, Margaret M.
Tambwe, Mohamed M.
Takken, Willem
van Loon, Joop J. A.
Moore, Sarah J.
Saddler, Adam
Chitnis, Nakul
Hiscox, Alexandra
author_sort Fillinger, Ulrike
collection PubMed
description Novel malaria vector control strategies targeting the odour-orientation of mosquitoes during host-seeking, such as ‘attract-and-kill’ or ‘push-and-pull’, have been suggested as complementary tools to indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticidal nets. These would be particularly beneficial if they can target vectors in the peri-domestic space where people are unprotected by traditional interventions. A randomized double-blind placebo-control study was implemented in western Kenya to evaluate: a ‘push’ intervention (spatial repellent) using transfluthrin-treated fabric strips positioned at open eave gaps of houses; a ‘pull’ intervention placing an odour-baited mosquito trap at a 5 m distance from a house; the combined ‘push–pull’ package; and the control where houses contained all elements but without active ingredients. Treatments were rotated through 12 houses in a randomized-block design. Outdoor biting was estimated using human landing catches, and indoor mosquito densities using light-traps. None of the interventions provided any protection from outdoor biting malaria vectors. The ‘push’ reduced indoor vector densities dominated by Anopheles funestus by around two thirds. The ‘pull’ device did not add any benefit. In the light of the high Anopheles arabiensis biting densities outdoors in the study location, the search for efficient outdoor protection and effective pull components needs to continue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10336143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103361432023-07-13 A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact Fillinger, Ulrike Denz, Adrian Njoroge, Margaret M. Tambwe, Mohamed M. Takken, Willem van Loon, Joop J. A. Moore, Sarah J. Saddler, Adam Chitnis, Nakul Hiscox, Alexandra Sci Rep Article Novel malaria vector control strategies targeting the odour-orientation of mosquitoes during host-seeking, such as ‘attract-and-kill’ or ‘push-and-pull’, have been suggested as complementary tools to indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticidal nets. These would be particularly beneficial if they can target vectors in the peri-domestic space where people are unprotected by traditional interventions. A randomized double-blind placebo-control study was implemented in western Kenya to evaluate: a ‘push’ intervention (spatial repellent) using transfluthrin-treated fabric strips positioned at open eave gaps of houses; a ‘pull’ intervention placing an odour-baited mosquito trap at a 5 m distance from a house; the combined ‘push–pull’ package; and the control where houses contained all elements but without active ingredients. Treatments were rotated through 12 houses in a randomized-block design. Outdoor biting was estimated using human landing catches, and indoor mosquito densities using light-traps. None of the interventions provided any protection from outdoor biting malaria vectors. The ‘push’ reduced indoor vector densities dominated by Anopheles funestus by around two thirds. The ‘pull’ device did not add any benefit. In the light of the high Anopheles arabiensis biting densities outdoors in the study location, the search for efficient outdoor protection and effective pull components needs to continue. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10336143/ /pubmed/37433881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38463-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Fillinger, Ulrike
Denz, Adrian
Njoroge, Margaret M.
Tambwe, Mohamed M.
Takken, Willem
van Loon, Joop J. A.
Moore, Sarah J.
Saddler, Adam
Chitnis, Nakul
Hiscox, Alexandra
A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact
title A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact
title_full A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact
title_fullStr A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact
title_full_unstemmed A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact
title_short A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact
title_sort randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37433881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38463-5
work_keys_str_mv AT fillingerulrike arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT denzadrian arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT njorogemargaretm arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT tambwemohamedm arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT takkenwillem arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT vanloonjoopja arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT mooresarahj arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT saddleradam arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT chitnisnakul arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT hiscoxalexandra arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT fillingerulrike randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT denzadrian randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT njorogemargaretm randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT tambwemohamedm randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT takkenwillem randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT vanloonjoopja randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT mooresarahj randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT saddleradam randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT chitnisnakul randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact
AT hiscoxalexandra randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact