Cargando…
A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact
Novel malaria vector control strategies targeting the odour-orientation of mosquitoes during host-seeking, such as ‘attract-and-kill’ or ‘push-and-pull’, have been suggested as complementary tools to indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticidal nets. These would be particularly beneficial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37433881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38463-5 |
_version_ | 1785071147119804416 |
---|---|
author | Fillinger, Ulrike Denz, Adrian Njoroge, Margaret M. Tambwe, Mohamed M. Takken, Willem van Loon, Joop J. A. Moore, Sarah J. Saddler, Adam Chitnis, Nakul Hiscox, Alexandra |
author_facet | Fillinger, Ulrike Denz, Adrian Njoroge, Margaret M. Tambwe, Mohamed M. Takken, Willem van Loon, Joop J. A. Moore, Sarah J. Saddler, Adam Chitnis, Nakul Hiscox, Alexandra |
author_sort | Fillinger, Ulrike |
collection | PubMed |
description | Novel malaria vector control strategies targeting the odour-orientation of mosquitoes during host-seeking, such as ‘attract-and-kill’ or ‘push-and-pull’, have been suggested as complementary tools to indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticidal nets. These would be particularly beneficial if they can target vectors in the peri-domestic space where people are unprotected by traditional interventions. A randomized double-blind placebo-control study was implemented in western Kenya to evaluate: a ‘push’ intervention (spatial repellent) using transfluthrin-treated fabric strips positioned at open eave gaps of houses; a ‘pull’ intervention placing an odour-baited mosquito trap at a 5 m distance from a house; the combined ‘push–pull’ package; and the control where houses contained all elements but without active ingredients. Treatments were rotated through 12 houses in a randomized-block design. Outdoor biting was estimated using human landing catches, and indoor mosquito densities using light-traps. None of the interventions provided any protection from outdoor biting malaria vectors. The ‘push’ reduced indoor vector densities dominated by Anopheles funestus by around two thirds. The ‘pull’ device did not add any benefit. In the light of the high Anopheles arabiensis biting densities outdoors in the study location, the search for efficient outdoor protection and effective pull components needs to continue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10336143 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103361432023-07-13 A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact Fillinger, Ulrike Denz, Adrian Njoroge, Margaret M. Tambwe, Mohamed M. Takken, Willem van Loon, Joop J. A. Moore, Sarah J. Saddler, Adam Chitnis, Nakul Hiscox, Alexandra Sci Rep Article Novel malaria vector control strategies targeting the odour-orientation of mosquitoes during host-seeking, such as ‘attract-and-kill’ or ‘push-and-pull’, have been suggested as complementary tools to indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticidal nets. These would be particularly beneficial if they can target vectors in the peri-domestic space where people are unprotected by traditional interventions. A randomized double-blind placebo-control study was implemented in western Kenya to evaluate: a ‘push’ intervention (spatial repellent) using transfluthrin-treated fabric strips positioned at open eave gaps of houses; a ‘pull’ intervention placing an odour-baited mosquito trap at a 5 m distance from a house; the combined ‘push–pull’ package; and the control where houses contained all elements but without active ingredients. Treatments were rotated through 12 houses in a randomized-block design. Outdoor biting was estimated using human landing catches, and indoor mosquito densities using light-traps. None of the interventions provided any protection from outdoor biting malaria vectors. The ‘push’ reduced indoor vector densities dominated by Anopheles funestus by around two thirds. The ‘pull’ device did not add any benefit. In the light of the high Anopheles arabiensis biting densities outdoors in the study location, the search for efficient outdoor protection and effective pull components needs to continue. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10336143/ /pubmed/37433881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38463-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Fillinger, Ulrike Denz, Adrian Njoroge, Margaret M. Tambwe, Mohamed M. Takken, Willem van Loon, Joop J. A. Moore, Sarah J. Saddler, Adam Chitnis, Nakul Hiscox, Alexandra A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact |
title | A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact |
title_full | A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact |
title_fullStr | A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact |
title_short | A randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact |
title_sort | randomized, double-blind placebo-control study assessing the protective efficacy of an odour-based ‘push–pull’ malaria vector control strategy in reducing human-vector contact |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37433881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38463-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fillingerulrike arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT denzadrian arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT njorogemargaretm arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT tambwemohamedm arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT takkenwillem arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT vanloonjoopja arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT mooresarahj arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT saddleradam arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT chitnisnakul arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT hiscoxalexandra arandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT fillingerulrike randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT denzadrian randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT njorogemargaretm randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT tambwemohamedm randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT takkenwillem randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT vanloonjoopja randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT mooresarahj randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT saddleradam randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT chitnisnakul randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact AT hiscoxalexandra randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolstudyassessingtheprotectiveefficacyofanodourbasedpushpullmalariavectorcontrolstrategyinreducinghumanvectorcontact |