Cargando…

Racehorse welfare across a training season

Racehorse welfare is gaining increasing public attention, however scientific evidence in this area is lacking. In order to develop a better understanding of racehorse welfare, it must be measured and monitored. This is the first study to assess racehorse welfare using scientific objective methods ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Annan, Rachel, Trigg, Leah E., Hockenhull, Jo, Allen, Kate, Butler, Deborah, Valenchon, Mathilde, Mullan, Siobhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37448582
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1208744
_version_ 1785071166895947776
author Annan, Rachel
Trigg, Leah E.
Hockenhull, Jo
Allen, Kate
Butler, Deborah
Valenchon, Mathilde
Mullan, Siobhan
author_facet Annan, Rachel
Trigg, Leah E.
Hockenhull, Jo
Allen, Kate
Butler, Deborah
Valenchon, Mathilde
Mullan, Siobhan
author_sort Annan, Rachel
collection PubMed
description Racehorse welfare is gaining increasing public attention, however scientific evidence in this area is lacking. In order to develop a better understanding of racehorse welfare, it must be measured and monitored. This is the first study to assess racehorse welfare using scientific objective methods across a training season. The aim of this study was threefold, firstly to investigate welfare measures which could be used in the first welfare assessment protocol for racehorses. Secondly, to understand the effect that a racing and training season had on individual racehorses and thirdly to identify risk factors for both good and poor welfare. Thirteen racehorse training yards were visited at the beginning and the peak of the racing season in England. Behavioral observations along with individual environmental and animal-based welfare measures were carried out on 353 horses in 13 training yards selected for variability. In our sample the horses were generally in good physical health: 94% of horses recorded as an ideal body condition score, no horses had signs of hoof neglect and 77.7% had no nasal discharge. The overall prevalence of external Mouth Corner Lesions was 12.9% and was significantly higher for Flat racing than Jump racing horses. The majority of horses (67.5%) showed positive horse human interactions. When stabled 54.1% horses had physical social contact and nasal discharge was not associated with increased physical contact. The training season significantly affected Human Reactivity Tests, Horse Grimace Scale scores and time spent resting and feeding. A total of 14.5% of horses displayed stereotypic behavior on at least two occasions. Horses with windows in their stables spent more time surveying their surroundings. Overall, in this population of racehorses, horses spent around a third of their daytime feeding (33.7%) followed by time spent standing resting (22.6%). The welfare assessment protocol used in this study is suitable for use in industry to collect welfare data on racehorses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10336241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103362412023-07-13 Racehorse welfare across a training season Annan, Rachel Trigg, Leah E. Hockenhull, Jo Allen, Kate Butler, Deborah Valenchon, Mathilde Mullan, Siobhan Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Racehorse welfare is gaining increasing public attention, however scientific evidence in this area is lacking. In order to develop a better understanding of racehorse welfare, it must be measured and monitored. This is the first study to assess racehorse welfare using scientific objective methods across a training season. The aim of this study was threefold, firstly to investigate welfare measures which could be used in the first welfare assessment protocol for racehorses. Secondly, to understand the effect that a racing and training season had on individual racehorses and thirdly to identify risk factors for both good and poor welfare. Thirteen racehorse training yards were visited at the beginning and the peak of the racing season in England. Behavioral observations along with individual environmental and animal-based welfare measures were carried out on 353 horses in 13 training yards selected for variability. In our sample the horses were generally in good physical health: 94% of horses recorded as an ideal body condition score, no horses had signs of hoof neglect and 77.7% had no nasal discharge. The overall prevalence of external Mouth Corner Lesions was 12.9% and was significantly higher for Flat racing than Jump racing horses. The majority of horses (67.5%) showed positive horse human interactions. When stabled 54.1% horses had physical social contact and nasal discharge was not associated with increased physical contact. The training season significantly affected Human Reactivity Tests, Horse Grimace Scale scores and time spent resting and feeding. A total of 14.5% of horses displayed stereotypic behavior on at least two occasions. Horses with windows in their stables spent more time surveying their surroundings. Overall, in this population of racehorses, horses spent around a third of their daytime feeding (33.7%) followed by time spent standing resting (22.6%). The welfare assessment protocol used in this study is suitable for use in industry to collect welfare data on racehorses. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10336241/ /pubmed/37448582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1208744 Text en Copyright © 2023 Annan, Trigg, Hockenhull, Allen, Butler, Valenchon and Mullan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Annan, Rachel
Trigg, Leah E.
Hockenhull, Jo
Allen, Kate
Butler, Deborah
Valenchon, Mathilde
Mullan, Siobhan
Racehorse welfare across a training season
title Racehorse welfare across a training season
title_full Racehorse welfare across a training season
title_fullStr Racehorse welfare across a training season
title_full_unstemmed Racehorse welfare across a training season
title_short Racehorse welfare across a training season
title_sort racehorse welfare across a training season
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37448582
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1208744
work_keys_str_mv AT annanrachel racehorsewelfareacrossatrainingseason
AT triggleahe racehorsewelfareacrossatrainingseason
AT hockenhulljo racehorsewelfareacrossatrainingseason
AT allenkate racehorsewelfareacrossatrainingseason
AT butlerdeborah racehorsewelfareacrossatrainingseason
AT valenchonmathilde racehorsewelfareacrossatrainingseason
AT mullansiobhan racehorsewelfareacrossatrainingseason