Cargando…
Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries
Incidental captures (bycatch) remain a key global conservation threat for cetaceans. Bycatch of harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena in set gillnets is routinely monitored in European Union fisheries, but generally relies on data collected at low spatio-temporal resolution or over short periods. In De...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.2570 |
_version_ | 1785071198482202624 |
---|---|
author | Kindt-Larsen, Lotte Glemarec, Gildas Berg, Casper W. Königson, Sara Kroner, Anne-Mette Søgaard, Mathias Lusseau, David |
author_facet | Kindt-Larsen, Lotte Glemarec, Gildas Berg, Casper W. Königson, Sara Kroner, Anne-Mette Søgaard, Mathias Lusseau, David |
author_sort | Kindt-Larsen, Lotte |
collection | PubMed |
description | Incidental captures (bycatch) remain a key global conservation threat for cetaceans. Bycatch of harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena in set gillnets is routinely monitored in European Union fisheries, but generally relies on data collected at low spatio-temporal resolution or over short periods. In Denmark, a long-term monitoring programme started in 2010 using electronic monitoring to collect data on porpoise bycatch and gillnet fishing effort at a fine spatial and temporal scale, including time and position of each fishing operation, together with every associated bycatch event. We used these observations to model bycatch rates, given the operational and ecological characteristics of each haul observed in Danish waters. Data on fishing effort from the Danish and Swedish gillnet fleets were collected to predict fleet-wide porpoise bycatch in gillnets at regional level. Between 2010 and 2020, yearly total bycatch averaged 2088 animals (95% Cl: 667–6798). For the Western Baltic assessment unit, bycatch levels were above sustainability thresholds. These results demonstrate that fishing characteristics are key determinants of porpoise bycatch and that classical approaches ignoring these features would produce biased estimates. It emphasizes the need for efficient and informative monitoring methods to understand possible conservation impacts of marine mammal bycatch and to implement tailored mitigation techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10336385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103363852023-07-13 Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries Kindt-Larsen, Lotte Glemarec, Gildas Berg, Casper W. Königson, Sara Kroner, Anne-Mette Søgaard, Mathias Lusseau, David Proc Biol Sci Global Change and Conservation Incidental captures (bycatch) remain a key global conservation threat for cetaceans. Bycatch of harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena in set gillnets is routinely monitored in European Union fisheries, but generally relies on data collected at low spatio-temporal resolution or over short periods. In Denmark, a long-term monitoring programme started in 2010 using electronic monitoring to collect data on porpoise bycatch and gillnet fishing effort at a fine spatial and temporal scale, including time and position of each fishing operation, together with every associated bycatch event. We used these observations to model bycatch rates, given the operational and ecological characteristics of each haul observed in Danish waters. Data on fishing effort from the Danish and Swedish gillnet fleets were collected to predict fleet-wide porpoise bycatch in gillnets at regional level. Between 2010 and 2020, yearly total bycatch averaged 2088 animals (95% Cl: 667–6798). For the Western Baltic assessment unit, bycatch levels were above sustainability thresholds. These results demonstrate that fishing characteristics are key determinants of porpoise bycatch and that classical approaches ignoring these features would produce biased estimates. It emphasizes the need for efficient and informative monitoring methods to understand possible conservation impacts of marine mammal bycatch and to implement tailored mitigation techniques. The Royal Society 2023-07-12 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10336385/ /pubmed/37434528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.2570 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Global Change and Conservation Kindt-Larsen, Lotte Glemarec, Gildas Berg, Casper W. Königson, Sara Kroner, Anne-Mette Søgaard, Mathias Lusseau, David Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries |
title | Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries |
title_full | Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries |
title_fullStr | Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries |
title_full_unstemmed | Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries |
title_short | Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries |
title_sort | knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries |
topic | Global Change and Conservation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.2570 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kindtlarsenlotte knowingthefisherytoknowthebycatchbiascorrectedestimatesofharbourporpoisebycatchingillnetfisheries AT glemarecgildas knowingthefisherytoknowthebycatchbiascorrectedestimatesofharbourporpoisebycatchingillnetfisheries AT bergcasperw knowingthefisherytoknowthebycatchbiascorrectedestimatesofharbourporpoisebycatchingillnetfisheries AT konigsonsara knowingthefisherytoknowthebycatchbiascorrectedestimatesofharbourporpoisebycatchingillnetfisheries AT kronerannemette knowingthefisherytoknowthebycatchbiascorrectedestimatesofharbourporpoisebycatchingillnetfisheries AT søgaardmathias knowingthefisherytoknowthebycatchbiascorrectedestimatesofharbourporpoisebycatchingillnetfisheries AT lusseaudavid knowingthefisherytoknowthebycatchbiascorrectedestimatesofharbourporpoisebycatchingillnetfisheries |