Cargando…

Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries

Incidental captures (bycatch) remain a key global conservation threat for cetaceans. Bycatch of harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena in set gillnets is routinely monitored in European Union fisheries, but generally relies on data collected at low spatio-temporal resolution or over short periods. In De...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kindt-Larsen, Lotte, Glemarec, Gildas, Berg, Casper W., Königson, Sara, Kroner, Anne-Mette, Søgaard, Mathias, Lusseau, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.2570
_version_ 1785071198482202624
author Kindt-Larsen, Lotte
Glemarec, Gildas
Berg, Casper W.
Königson, Sara
Kroner, Anne-Mette
Søgaard, Mathias
Lusseau, David
author_facet Kindt-Larsen, Lotte
Glemarec, Gildas
Berg, Casper W.
Königson, Sara
Kroner, Anne-Mette
Søgaard, Mathias
Lusseau, David
author_sort Kindt-Larsen, Lotte
collection PubMed
description Incidental captures (bycatch) remain a key global conservation threat for cetaceans. Bycatch of harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena in set gillnets is routinely monitored in European Union fisheries, but generally relies on data collected at low spatio-temporal resolution or over short periods. In Denmark, a long-term monitoring programme started in 2010 using electronic monitoring to collect data on porpoise bycatch and gillnet fishing effort at a fine spatial and temporal scale, including time and position of each fishing operation, together with every associated bycatch event. We used these observations to model bycatch rates, given the operational and ecological characteristics of each haul observed in Danish waters. Data on fishing effort from the Danish and Swedish gillnet fleets were collected to predict fleet-wide porpoise bycatch in gillnets at regional level. Between 2010 and 2020, yearly total bycatch averaged 2088 animals (95% Cl: 667–6798). For the Western Baltic assessment unit, bycatch levels were above sustainability thresholds. These results demonstrate that fishing characteristics are key determinants of porpoise bycatch and that classical approaches ignoring these features would produce biased estimates. It emphasizes the need for efficient and informative monitoring methods to understand possible conservation impacts of marine mammal bycatch and to implement tailored mitigation techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10336385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103363852023-07-13 Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries Kindt-Larsen, Lotte Glemarec, Gildas Berg, Casper W. Königson, Sara Kroner, Anne-Mette Søgaard, Mathias Lusseau, David Proc Biol Sci Global Change and Conservation Incidental captures (bycatch) remain a key global conservation threat for cetaceans. Bycatch of harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena in set gillnets is routinely monitored in European Union fisheries, but generally relies on data collected at low spatio-temporal resolution or over short periods. In Denmark, a long-term monitoring programme started in 2010 using electronic monitoring to collect data on porpoise bycatch and gillnet fishing effort at a fine spatial and temporal scale, including time and position of each fishing operation, together with every associated bycatch event. We used these observations to model bycatch rates, given the operational and ecological characteristics of each haul observed in Danish waters. Data on fishing effort from the Danish and Swedish gillnet fleets were collected to predict fleet-wide porpoise bycatch in gillnets at regional level. Between 2010 and 2020, yearly total bycatch averaged 2088 animals (95% Cl: 667–6798). For the Western Baltic assessment unit, bycatch levels were above sustainability thresholds. These results demonstrate that fishing characteristics are key determinants of porpoise bycatch and that classical approaches ignoring these features would produce biased estimates. It emphasizes the need for efficient and informative monitoring methods to understand possible conservation impacts of marine mammal bycatch and to implement tailored mitigation techniques. The Royal Society 2023-07-12 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10336385/ /pubmed/37434528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.2570 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Global Change and Conservation
Kindt-Larsen, Lotte
Glemarec, Gildas
Berg, Casper W.
Königson, Sara
Kroner, Anne-Mette
Søgaard, Mathias
Lusseau, David
Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries
title Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries
title_full Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries
title_fullStr Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries
title_full_unstemmed Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries
title_short Knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries
title_sort knowing the fishery to know the bycatch: bias-corrected estimates of harbour porpoise bycatch in gillnet fisheries
topic Global Change and Conservation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37434528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.2570
work_keys_str_mv AT kindtlarsenlotte knowingthefisherytoknowthebycatchbiascorrectedestimatesofharbourporpoisebycatchingillnetfisheries
AT glemarecgildas knowingthefisherytoknowthebycatchbiascorrectedestimatesofharbourporpoisebycatchingillnetfisheries
AT bergcasperw knowingthefisherytoknowthebycatchbiascorrectedestimatesofharbourporpoisebycatchingillnetfisheries
AT konigsonsara knowingthefisherytoknowthebycatchbiascorrectedestimatesofharbourporpoisebycatchingillnetfisheries
AT kronerannemette knowingthefisherytoknowthebycatchbiascorrectedestimatesofharbourporpoisebycatchingillnetfisheries
AT søgaardmathias knowingthefisherytoknowthebycatchbiascorrectedestimatesofharbourporpoisebycatchingillnetfisheries
AT lusseaudavid knowingthefisherytoknowthebycatchbiascorrectedestimatesofharbourporpoisebycatchingillnetfisheries