Reply to comment on “which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy” by Hirth et al., 2021, RSC Adv., 11, 39545, DOI: 10.1039/d1ra06251d”

This is a reply to the Comment of Okhrimenko et al. in the same issue of RSC Advances. We discuss the arguments brought forward by said authors, oppose their objections and show the unchanged validity of our results. [Image: see text]

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirth, Sabine, Wohlleben, Wendel, Waindok, Hubert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023
Materias:
Chemistry
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37448780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d3ra02232c
_version_ 1785071217384882176
author Hirth, Sabine
Wohlleben, Wendel
Waindok, Hubert
author_facet Hirth, Sabine
Wohlleben, Wendel
Waindok, Hubert
author_sort Hirth, Sabine
collection PubMed
description This is a reply to the Comment of Okhrimenko et al. in the same issue of RSC Advances. We discuss the arguments brought forward by said authors, oppose their objections and show the unchanged validity of our results. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10336475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103364752023-07-13 Reply to comment on “which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy” by Hirth et al., 2021, RSC Adv., 11, 39545, DOI: 10.1039/d1ra06251d” Hirth, Sabine Wohlleben, Wendel Waindok, Hubert RSC Adv Chemistry This is a reply to the Comment of Okhrimenko et al. in the same issue of RSC Advances. We discuss the arguments brought forward by said authors, oppose their objections and show the unchanged validity of our results. [Image: see text] The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10336475/ /pubmed/37448780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d3ra02232c Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Hirth, Sabine
Wohlleben, Wendel
Waindok, Hubert
Reply to comment on “which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy” by Hirth et al., 2021, RSC Adv., 11, 39545, DOI: 10.1039/d1ra06251d”
title Reply to comment on “which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy” by Hirth et al., 2021, RSC Adv., 11, 39545, DOI: 10.1039/d1ra06251d”
title_full Reply to comment on “which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy” by Hirth et al., 2021, RSC Adv., 11, 39545, DOI: 10.1039/d1ra06251d”
title_fullStr Reply to comment on “which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy” by Hirth et al., 2021, RSC Adv., 11, 39545, DOI: 10.1039/d1ra06251d”
title_full_unstemmed Reply to comment on “which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy” by Hirth et al., 2021, RSC Adv., 11, 39545, DOI: 10.1039/d1ra06251d”
title_short Reply to comment on “which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? A detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy” by Hirth et al., 2021, RSC Adv., 11, 39545, DOI: 10.1039/d1ra06251d”
title_sort reply to comment on “which fraction of stone wool fibre surface remains uncoated by binder? a detailed analysis by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy” by hirth et al., 2021, rsc adv., 11, 39545, doi: 10.1039/d1ra06251d”
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37448780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d3ra02232c
work_keys_str_mv AT hirthsabine replytocommentonwhichfractionofstonewoolfibresurfaceremainsuncoatedbybinderadetailedanalysisbytimeofflightsecondaryionmassspectrometryandxrayphotoelectronspectroscopybyhirthetal2021rscadv1139545doi101039d1ra06251d
AT wohllebenwendel replytocommentonwhichfractionofstonewoolfibresurfaceremainsuncoatedbybinderadetailedanalysisbytimeofflightsecondaryionmassspectrometryandxrayphotoelectronspectroscopybyhirthetal2021rscadv1139545doi101039d1ra06251d
AT waindokhubert replytocommentonwhichfractionofstonewoolfibresurfaceremainsuncoatedbybinderadetailedanalysisbytimeofflightsecondaryionmassspectrometryandxrayphotoelectronspectroscopybyhirthetal2021rscadv1139545doi101039d1ra06251d

Ejemplares similares