Cargando…
Effect of plasma surface treatment of three different CAD/CAM materials on the micro shear bond strength with resin cement (A comparative in vitro study)
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of plasma treatment versus conventional treatment on the micro shear bond strength (μSBS), surface roughness, and wettability of three different CAD/CAM materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty cylindrical specimens (5 mm diameter × 3 mm...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17790 |
_version_ | 1785071230155489280 |
---|---|
author | Jassim, Shahad Jabbar Majeed, Manhal A. |
author_facet | Jassim, Shahad Jabbar Majeed, Manhal A. |
author_sort | Jassim, Shahad Jabbar |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of plasma treatment versus conventional treatment on the micro shear bond strength (μSBS), surface roughness, and wettability of three different CAD/CAM materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty cylindrical specimens (5 mm diameter × 3 mm height) were prepared from three different CAD/CAM materials: Group A: Zirconia, Group B: Lithium disilicate, and Group C: Resin nano-ceramic. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups according to surface treatment used: Subgroup I: Conventional treatment, zirconia was sandblasted with Al(2)O(3), while lithium disilicate and resin nano-ceramic were etched with hydrofluoric acid. Subgroup II: Plasma treatment, the surface of each material was treated with a plasma device (PiezoBrush® PZ3 Handheld Device, Relyon Plasma, Regensburg, Germany). G-Multi PRIMER was applied, then self-adhesive cement (G-CEM ONE) was applied using a split mold (1 mm diameter × 3 mm height), and μSBS was tested in a universal testing machine. The surface roughness was measured using a profilometer. Nine additional specimens of each material for wettability test using an optical tensiometer. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Bonferroni test at a level of significance of 0.05. RESULTS: The highest mean of μSBS was recorded by AII (27.3 MPa), while the lowest was recorded by AI (17.9 MPa). One-way ANOVA test revealed a significant difference among groups. Bonferroni test showed each two subgroups significant difference except subgroups AI, CI and BII, CII, where there was a non-significant difference. For all CAD/CAM materials, conventional treatment increased the surface roughness compared to plasma treatment, while the contact angle decreased after plasma treatment. CONCLUSION: Plasma treatment increased the μSBS of resin cement to zirconia significantly while not significantly affecting the μSBS of resin nano-ceramic. Conventional treatment of lithium disilicate provided significantly higher μSBS than plasma treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10336531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103365312023-07-13 Effect of plasma surface treatment of three different CAD/CAM materials on the micro shear bond strength with resin cement (A comparative in vitro study) Jassim, Shahad Jabbar Majeed, Manhal A. Heliyon Research Article OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of plasma treatment versus conventional treatment on the micro shear bond strength (μSBS), surface roughness, and wettability of three different CAD/CAM materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty cylindrical specimens (5 mm diameter × 3 mm height) were prepared from three different CAD/CAM materials: Group A: Zirconia, Group B: Lithium disilicate, and Group C: Resin nano-ceramic. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups according to surface treatment used: Subgroup I: Conventional treatment, zirconia was sandblasted with Al(2)O(3), while lithium disilicate and resin nano-ceramic were etched with hydrofluoric acid. Subgroup II: Plasma treatment, the surface of each material was treated with a plasma device (PiezoBrush® PZ3 Handheld Device, Relyon Plasma, Regensburg, Germany). G-Multi PRIMER was applied, then self-adhesive cement (G-CEM ONE) was applied using a split mold (1 mm diameter × 3 mm height), and μSBS was tested in a universal testing machine. The surface roughness was measured using a profilometer. Nine additional specimens of each material for wettability test using an optical tensiometer. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data were analyzed using ANOVA and Bonferroni test at a level of significance of 0.05. RESULTS: The highest mean of μSBS was recorded by AII (27.3 MPa), while the lowest was recorded by AI (17.9 MPa). One-way ANOVA test revealed a significant difference among groups. Bonferroni test showed each two subgroups significant difference except subgroups AI, CI and BII, CII, where there was a non-significant difference. For all CAD/CAM materials, conventional treatment increased the surface roughness compared to plasma treatment, while the contact angle decreased after plasma treatment. CONCLUSION: Plasma treatment increased the μSBS of resin cement to zirconia significantly while not significantly affecting the μSBS of resin nano-ceramic. Conventional treatment of lithium disilicate provided significantly higher μSBS than plasma treatment. Elsevier 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10336531/ /pubmed/37449108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17790 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jassim, Shahad Jabbar Majeed, Manhal A. Effect of plasma surface treatment of three different CAD/CAM materials on the micro shear bond strength with resin cement (A comparative in vitro study) |
title | Effect of plasma surface treatment of three different CAD/CAM materials on the micro shear bond strength with resin cement (A comparative in vitro study) |
title_full | Effect of plasma surface treatment of three different CAD/CAM materials on the micro shear bond strength with resin cement (A comparative in vitro study) |
title_fullStr | Effect of plasma surface treatment of three different CAD/CAM materials on the micro shear bond strength with resin cement (A comparative in vitro study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of plasma surface treatment of three different CAD/CAM materials on the micro shear bond strength with resin cement (A comparative in vitro study) |
title_short | Effect of plasma surface treatment of three different CAD/CAM materials on the micro shear bond strength with resin cement (A comparative in vitro study) |
title_sort | effect of plasma surface treatment of three different cad/cam materials on the micro shear bond strength with resin cement (a comparative in vitro study) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17790 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jassimshahadjabbar effectofplasmasurfacetreatmentofthreedifferentcadcammaterialsonthemicroshearbondstrengthwithresincementacomparativeinvitrostudy AT majeedmanhala effectofplasmasurfacetreatmentofthreedifferentcadcammaterialsonthemicroshearbondstrengthwithresincementacomparativeinvitrostudy |