Cargando…

Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition

In the environment, bacteria compete for niche occupancy and resources; they have, therefore, evolved a broad variety of antibacterial weapons to destroy competitors. Current laboratory techniques to evaluate antibacterial activity are usually labor intensive, low throughput, costly, and time consum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taillefer, Boris, Grandjean, Marie M., Herrou, Julien, Robert, Donovan, Mignot, Tâm, Sebban-Kreuzer, Corinne, Cascales, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bio-Protocol 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449039
http://dx.doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.4706
_version_ 1785071239315849216
author Taillefer, Boris
Grandjean, Marie M.
Herrou, Julien
Robert, Donovan
Mignot, Tâm
Sebban-Kreuzer, Corinne
Cascales, Eric
author_facet Taillefer, Boris
Grandjean, Marie M.
Herrou, Julien
Robert, Donovan
Mignot, Tâm
Sebban-Kreuzer, Corinne
Cascales, Eric
author_sort Taillefer, Boris
collection PubMed
description In the environment, bacteria compete for niche occupancy and resources; they have, therefore, evolved a broad variety of antibacterial weapons to destroy competitors. Current laboratory techniques to evaluate antibacterial activity are usually labor intensive, low throughput, costly, and time consuming. Typical assays rely on the outgrowth of colonies of prey cells on selective solid media after competition. Here, we present fast, inexpensive, and complementary optimized protocols to qualitatively and quantitively measure antibacterial activity. The first method is based on the degradation of a cell-impermeable chromogenic substrate of the β-galactosidase, a cytoplasmic enzyme released during lysis of the attacked reporter strain. The second method relies on the lag time required for the attacked cells to reach a defined optical density after the competition, which is directly dependent on the initial number of surviving cells. Key features First method utilizes the release of β-galactosidase as a proxy for bacterial lysis. Second method is based on the growth timing of surviving cells. Combination of two methods discriminates between cell death and lysis, cell death without lysis, or survival to quasi-lysis. Methods optimized to various bacterial species such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Myxococcus xanthus. Graphical overview [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10336571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Bio-Protocol
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103365712023-07-13 Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition Taillefer, Boris Grandjean, Marie M. Herrou, Julien Robert, Donovan Mignot, Tâm Sebban-Kreuzer, Corinne Cascales, Eric Bio Protoc Methods Article In the environment, bacteria compete for niche occupancy and resources; they have, therefore, evolved a broad variety of antibacterial weapons to destroy competitors. Current laboratory techniques to evaluate antibacterial activity are usually labor intensive, low throughput, costly, and time consuming. Typical assays rely on the outgrowth of colonies of prey cells on selective solid media after competition. Here, we present fast, inexpensive, and complementary optimized protocols to qualitatively and quantitively measure antibacterial activity. The first method is based on the degradation of a cell-impermeable chromogenic substrate of the β-galactosidase, a cytoplasmic enzyme released during lysis of the attacked reporter strain. The second method relies on the lag time required for the attacked cells to reach a defined optical density after the competition, which is directly dependent on the initial number of surviving cells. Key features First method utilizes the release of β-galactosidase as a proxy for bacterial lysis. Second method is based on the growth timing of surviving cells. Combination of two methods discriminates between cell death and lysis, cell death without lysis, or survival to quasi-lysis. Methods optimized to various bacterial species such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Myxococcus xanthus. Graphical overview [Image: see text] Bio-Protocol 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10336571/ /pubmed/37449039 http://dx.doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.4706 Text en ©Copyright : © 2023 The Authors; This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Methods Article
Taillefer, Boris
Grandjean, Marie M.
Herrou, Julien
Robert, Donovan
Mignot, Tâm
Sebban-Kreuzer, Corinne
Cascales, Eric
Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition
title Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition
title_full Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition
title_fullStr Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition
title_short Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition
title_sort qualitative and quantitative methods to measure antibacterial activity resulting from bacterial competition
topic Methods Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449039
http://dx.doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.4706
work_keys_str_mv AT tailleferboris qualitativeandquantitativemethodstomeasureantibacterialactivityresultingfrombacterialcompetition
AT grandjeanmariem qualitativeandquantitativemethodstomeasureantibacterialactivityresultingfrombacterialcompetition
AT herroujulien qualitativeandquantitativemethodstomeasureantibacterialactivityresultingfrombacterialcompetition
AT robertdonovan qualitativeandquantitativemethodstomeasureantibacterialactivityresultingfrombacterialcompetition
AT mignottam qualitativeandquantitativemethodstomeasureantibacterialactivityresultingfrombacterialcompetition
AT sebbankreuzercorinne qualitativeandquantitativemethodstomeasureantibacterialactivityresultingfrombacterialcompetition
AT cascaleseric qualitativeandquantitativemethodstomeasureantibacterialactivityresultingfrombacterialcompetition