Cargando…
Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition
In the environment, bacteria compete for niche occupancy and resources; they have, therefore, evolved a broad variety of antibacterial weapons to destroy competitors. Current laboratory techniques to evaluate antibacterial activity are usually labor intensive, low throughput, costly, and time consum...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bio-Protocol
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449039 http://dx.doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.4706 |
_version_ | 1785071239315849216 |
---|---|
author | Taillefer, Boris Grandjean, Marie M. Herrou, Julien Robert, Donovan Mignot, Tâm Sebban-Kreuzer, Corinne Cascales, Eric |
author_facet | Taillefer, Boris Grandjean, Marie M. Herrou, Julien Robert, Donovan Mignot, Tâm Sebban-Kreuzer, Corinne Cascales, Eric |
author_sort | Taillefer, Boris |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the environment, bacteria compete for niche occupancy and resources; they have, therefore, evolved a broad variety of antibacterial weapons to destroy competitors. Current laboratory techniques to evaluate antibacterial activity are usually labor intensive, low throughput, costly, and time consuming. Typical assays rely on the outgrowth of colonies of prey cells on selective solid media after competition. Here, we present fast, inexpensive, and complementary optimized protocols to qualitatively and quantitively measure antibacterial activity. The first method is based on the degradation of a cell-impermeable chromogenic substrate of the β-galactosidase, a cytoplasmic enzyme released during lysis of the attacked reporter strain. The second method relies on the lag time required for the attacked cells to reach a defined optical density after the competition, which is directly dependent on the initial number of surviving cells. Key features First method utilizes the release of β-galactosidase as a proxy for bacterial lysis. Second method is based on the growth timing of surviving cells. Combination of two methods discriminates between cell death and lysis, cell death without lysis, or survival to quasi-lysis. Methods optimized to various bacterial species such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Myxococcus xanthus. Graphical overview [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10336571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Bio-Protocol |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103365712023-07-13 Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition Taillefer, Boris Grandjean, Marie M. Herrou, Julien Robert, Donovan Mignot, Tâm Sebban-Kreuzer, Corinne Cascales, Eric Bio Protoc Methods Article In the environment, bacteria compete for niche occupancy and resources; they have, therefore, evolved a broad variety of antibacterial weapons to destroy competitors. Current laboratory techniques to evaluate antibacterial activity are usually labor intensive, low throughput, costly, and time consuming. Typical assays rely on the outgrowth of colonies of prey cells on selective solid media after competition. Here, we present fast, inexpensive, and complementary optimized protocols to qualitatively and quantitively measure antibacterial activity. The first method is based on the degradation of a cell-impermeable chromogenic substrate of the β-galactosidase, a cytoplasmic enzyme released during lysis of the attacked reporter strain. The second method relies on the lag time required for the attacked cells to reach a defined optical density after the competition, which is directly dependent on the initial number of surviving cells. Key features First method utilizes the release of β-galactosidase as a proxy for bacterial lysis. Second method is based on the growth timing of surviving cells. Combination of two methods discriminates between cell death and lysis, cell death without lysis, or survival to quasi-lysis. Methods optimized to various bacterial species such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Myxococcus xanthus. Graphical overview [Image: see text] Bio-Protocol 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10336571/ /pubmed/37449039 http://dx.doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.4706 Text en ©Copyright : © 2023 The Authors; This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Methods Article Taillefer, Boris Grandjean, Marie M. Herrou, Julien Robert, Donovan Mignot, Tâm Sebban-Kreuzer, Corinne Cascales, Eric Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition |
title | Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition |
title_full | Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition |
title_fullStr | Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition |
title_short | Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Measure Antibacterial Activity Resulting from Bacterial Competition |
title_sort | qualitative and quantitative methods to measure antibacterial activity resulting from bacterial competition |
topic | Methods Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449039 http://dx.doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.4706 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tailleferboris qualitativeandquantitativemethodstomeasureantibacterialactivityresultingfrombacterialcompetition AT grandjeanmariem qualitativeandquantitativemethodstomeasureantibacterialactivityresultingfrombacterialcompetition AT herroujulien qualitativeandquantitativemethodstomeasureantibacterialactivityresultingfrombacterialcompetition AT robertdonovan qualitativeandquantitativemethodstomeasureantibacterialactivityresultingfrombacterialcompetition AT mignottam qualitativeandquantitativemethodstomeasureantibacterialactivityresultingfrombacterialcompetition AT sebbankreuzercorinne qualitativeandquantitativemethodstomeasureantibacterialactivityresultingfrombacterialcompetition AT cascaleseric qualitativeandquantitativemethodstomeasureantibacterialactivityresultingfrombacterialcompetition |