Cargando…

Assessment of the processing conditions which make the Ambrosia seeds non‐viable

The European Commission requested EFSA to provide an assessment of the processing conditions which make Ambrosia seeds non‐viable in feed materials and compound feed. This assessment also includes information on a reliable procedure to verify the non‐viability of the seeds. Ambrosia seeds are known...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schrenk, Dieter, Bignami, Margherita, Bodin, Laurent, Chipman, James Kevin, del Mazo, Jesús, Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina, Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron), Leblanc, Jean‐Charles, Nebbia, Carlo Stefano, Nielsen, Elsa, Ntzani, Evangelia, Petersen, Annette, Sand, Salomon, Schwerdtle, Tanja, Vleminckx, Christiane, Wallace, Heather, Christodoulidou, Anna, Hogstrand, Christer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37448443
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8102
_version_ 1785071255970381824
author Schrenk, Dieter
Bignami, Margherita
Bodin, Laurent
Chipman, James Kevin
del Mazo, Jesús
Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina
Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron)
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Nebbia, Carlo Stefano
Nielsen, Elsa
Ntzani, Evangelia
Petersen, Annette
Sand, Salomon
Schwerdtle, Tanja
Vleminckx, Christiane
Wallace, Heather
Christodoulidou, Anna
Hogstrand, Christer
author_facet Schrenk, Dieter
Bignami, Margherita
Bodin, Laurent
Chipman, James Kevin
del Mazo, Jesús
Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina
Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron)
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Nebbia, Carlo Stefano
Nielsen, Elsa
Ntzani, Evangelia
Petersen, Annette
Sand, Salomon
Schwerdtle, Tanja
Vleminckx, Christiane
Wallace, Heather
Christodoulidou, Anna
Hogstrand, Christer
collection PubMed
description The European Commission requested EFSA to provide an assessment of the processing conditions which make Ambrosia seeds non‐viable in feed materials and compound feed. This assessment also includes information on a reliable procedure to verify the non‐viability of the seeds. Ambrosia seeds are known contaminants in feed with maximum levels set in the Directive 2002/32/EC. The manufacturing processes and processing conditions applied to the feed may affect the viability of the Ambrosia seeds. Therefore, the CONTAM Panel compared these conditions with conditions that have been shown to be sufficient to render Ambrosia seeds non‐viable. The Panel concluded with a certainty of 99–100% that solvent extraction and toasting of oilseed meals at temperatures of 120°C with steam injection for 10 min or more will make Ambrosia seeds non‐viable. Since milling/grinding feed materials for compound feed of piglets, aquatic species and non‐food producing animals would not allow particles of sizes ≥1 mm (the minimum size of viable Ambrosia seeds) passing the grinding process it was considered very likely (with ≥ 90% certainty) that these feeds will not contain viable Ambrosia seeds. In poultry, pig, and possibly cattle feed, particle sizes are ≥ 1 mm and therefore Ambrosia seeds could likely (66–90% certainty) survive the grinding process. Starch and gluten either from corn or wheat wet milling would not contain Ambrosia seeds with 99–100% certainty. Finally, ensiling fresh forages contaminated with A. artemisiifolia seeds for more than 3 months is very likely to render all seeds non‐viable. The Panel concluded that a combination of the germination test and a subsequent triphenyl‐tetrazolium‐chloride (TTC) test will very likely (with ≥ 90% certainty) verify the non‐viability of Ambrosia seeds. The Panel recommends that data on the presence of viable Ambrosia seeds before and after the different feed production processes should be generated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10336658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103366582023-07-13 Assessment of the processing conditions which make the Ambrosia seeds non‐viable Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Margherita Bodin, Laurent Chipman, James Kevin del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Nielsen, Elsa Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Christodoulidou, Anna Hogstrand, Christer EFSA J Scientific Opinion The European Commission requested EFSA to provide an assessment of the processing conditions which make Ambrosia seeds non‐viable in feed materials and compound feed. This assessment also includes information on a reliable procedure to verify the non‐viability of the seeds. Ambrosia seeds are known contaminants in feed with maximum levels set in the Directive 2002/32/EC. The manufacturing processes and processing conditions applied to the feed may affect the viability of the Ambrosia seeds. Therefore, the CONTAM Panel compared these conditions with conditions that have been shown to be sufficient to render Ambrosia seeds non‐viable. The Panel concluded with a certainty of 99–100% that solvent extraction and toasting of oilseed meals at temperatures of 120°C with steam injection for 10 min or more will make Ambrosia seeds non‐viable. Since milling/grinding feed materials for compound feed of piglets, aquatic species and non‐food producing animals would not allow particles of sizes ≥1 mm (the minimum size of viable Ambrosia seeds) passing the grinding process it was considered very likely (with ≥ 90% certainty) that these feeds will not contain viable Ambrosia seeds. In poultry, pig, and possibly cattle feed, particle sizes are ≥ 1 mm and therefore Ambrosia seeds could likely (66–90% certainty) survive the grinding process. Starch and gluten either from corn or wheat wet milling would not contain Ambrosia seeds with 99–100% certainty. Finally, ensiling fresh forages contaminated with A. artemisiifolia seeds for more than 3 months is very likely to render all seeds non‐viable. The Panel concluded that a combination of the germination test and a subsequent triphenyl‐tetrazolium‐chloride (TTC) test will very likely (with ≥ 90% certainty) verify the non‐viability of Ambrosia seeds. The Panel recommends that data on the presence of viable Ambrosia seeds before and after the different feed production processes should be generated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10336658/ /pubmed/37448443 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8102 Text en © 2023 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Schrenk, Dieter
Bignami, Margherita
Bodin, Laurent
Chipman, James Kevin
del Mazo, Jesús
Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina
Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron)
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Nebbia, Carlo Stefano
Nielsen, Elsa
Ntzani, Evangelia
Petersen, Annette
Sand, Salomon
Schwerdtle, Tanja
Vleminckx, Christiane
Wallace, Heather
Christodoulidou, Anna
Hogstrand, Christer
Assessment of the processing conditions which make the Ambrosia seeds non‐viable
title Assessment of the processing conditions which make the Ambrosia seeds non‐viable
title_full Assessment of the processing conditions which make the Ambrosia seeds non‐viable
title_fullStr Assessment of the processing conditions which make the Ambrosia seeds non‐viable
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the processing conditions which make the Ambrosia seeds non‐viable
title_short Assessment of the processing conditions which make the Ambrosia seeds non‐viable
title_sort assessment of the processing conditions which make the ambrosia seeds non‐viable
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37448443
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8102
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT schrenkdieter assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT bignamimargherita assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT bodinlaurent assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT chipmanjameskevin assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT delmazojesus assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT graslkrauppbettina assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT hoogenboomlaurentiusron assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT leblancjeancharles assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT nebbiacarlostefano assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT nielsenelsa assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT ntzanievangelia assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT petersenannette assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT sandsalomon assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT schwerdtletanja assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT vleminckxchristiane assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT wallaceheather assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT christodoulidouanna assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable
AT hogstrandchrister assessmentoftheprocessingconditionswhichmaketheambrosiaseedsnonviable