Cargando…

Using Bayesian Evidence Synthesis Methods to Incorporate Real-World Evidence in Surrogate Endpoint Evaluation

OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, validation of surrogate endpoints has been carried out using randomized controlled trial (RCT) data. However, RCT data may be too limited to validate surrogate endpoints. In this article, we sought to improve the validation of surrogate endpoints with the inclusion of real-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wheaton, Lorna, Papanikos, Anastasios, Thomas, Anne, Bujkiewicz, Sylwia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X231162852
_version_ 1785071264702922752
author Wheaton, Lorna
Papanikos, Anastasios
Thomas, Anne
Bujkiewicz, Sylwia
author_facet Wheaton, Lorna
Papanikos, Anastasios
Thomas, Anne
Bujkiewicz, Sylwia
author_sort Wheaton, Lorna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, validation of surrogate endpoints has been carried out using randomized controlled trial (RCT) data. However, RCT data may be too limited to validate surrogate endpoints. In this article, we sought to improve the validation of surrogate endpoints with the inclusion of real-world evidence (RWE). METHODS: We use data from comparative RWE (cRWE) and single-arm RWE (sRWE) to supplement RCT evidence for the evaluation of progression-free survival (PFS) as a surrogate endpoint to overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Treatment effect estimates from RCTs, cRWE, and matched sRWE, comparing antiangiogenic treatments with chemotherapy, were used to inform surrogacy patterns and predictions of the treatment effect on OS from the treatment effect on PFS. RESULTS: Seven RCTs, 4 cRWE studies, and 2 matched sRWE studies were identified. The addition of RWE to RCTs reduced the uncertainty around the estimates of the parameters for the surrogate relationship. The addition of RWE to RCTs also improved the accuracy and precision of predictions of the treatment effect on OS obtained using data on the observed effect on PFS. CONCLUSION: The addition of RWE to RCT data improved the precision of the parameters describing the surrogate relationship between treatment effects on PFS and OS and the predicted clinical benefit of antiangiogenic therapies in mCRC. HIGHLIGHTS: Regulatory agencies increasingly rely on surrogate endpoints when making licensing decisions, and for the decisions to be robust, surrogate endpoints need to be validated. In the era of precision medicine, when surrogacy patterns may depend on the drug’s mechanism of action and trials of targeted therapies may be small, data from randomized controlled trials may be limited. Real-world evidence (RWE) is increasingly used at different stages of the drug development process. When used to enhance the evidence base for surrogate endpoint evaluation, RWE can improve inferences about the strength of surrogate relationships and the precision of predicted treatment effect on the final clinical outcome based on the observed effect on the surrogate endpoint in a new trial. Careful selection of RWE is needed to reduce risk of bias.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10336701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103367012023-07-13 Using Bayesian Evidence Synthesis Methods to Incorporate Real-World Evidence in Surrogate Endpoint Evaluation Wheaton, Lorna Papanikos, Anastasios Thomas, Anne Bujkiewicz, Sylwia Med Decis Making Original Research Articles OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, validation of surrogate endpoints has been carried out using randomized controlled trial (RCT) data. However, RCT data may be too limited to validate surrogate endpoints. In this article, we sought to improve the validation of surrogate endpoints with the inclusion of real-world evidence (RWE). METHODS: We use data from comparative RWE (cRWE) and single-arm RWE (sRWE) to supplement RCT evidence for the evaluation of progression-free survival (PFS) as a surrogate endpoint to overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Treatment effect estimates from RCTs, cRWE, and matched sRWE, comparing antiangiogenic treatments with chemotherapy, were used to inform surrogacy patterns and predictions of the treatment effect on OS from the treatment effect on PFS. RESULTS: Seven RCTs, 4 cRWE studies, and 2 matched sRWE studies were identified. The addition of RWE to RCTs reduced the uncertainty around the estimates of the parameters for the surrogate relationship. The addition of RWE to RCTs also improved the accuracy and precision of predictions of the treatment effect on OS obtained using data on the observed effect on PFS. CONCLUSION: The addition of RWE to RCT data improved the precision of the parameters describing the surrogate relationship between treatment effects on PFS and OS and the predicted clinical benefit of antiangiogenic therapies in mCRC. HIGHLIGHTS: Regulatory agencies increasingly rely on surrogate endpoints when making licensing decisions, and for the decisions to be robust, surrogate endpoints need to be validated. In the era of precision medicine, when surrogacy patterns may depend on the drug’s mechanism of action and trials of targeted therapies may be small, data from randomized controlled trials may be limited. Real-world evidence (RWE) is increasingly used at different stages of the drug development process. When used to enhance the evidence base for surrogate endpoint evaluation, RWE can improve inferences about the strength of surrogate relationships and the precision of predicted treatment effect on the final clinical outcome based on the observed effect on the surrogate endpoint in a new trial. Careful selection of RWE is needed to reduce risk of bias. SAGE Publications 2023-03-30 2023-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10336701/ /pubmed/36998240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X231162852 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Wheaton, Lorna
Papanikos, Anastasios
Thomas, Anne
Bujkiewicz, Sylwia
Using Bayesian Evidence Synthesis Methods to Incorporate Real-World Evidence in Surrogate Endpoint Evaluation
title Using Bayesian Evidence Synthesis Methods to Incorporate Real-World Evidence in Surrogate Endpoint Evaluation
title_full Using Bayesian Evidence Synthesis Methods to Incorporate Real-World Evidence in Surrogate Endpoint Evaluation
title_fullStr Using Bayesian Evidence Synthesis Methods to Incorporate Real-World Evidence in Surrogate Endpoint Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Using Bayesian Evidence Synthesis Methods to Incorporate Real-World Evidence in Surrogate Endpoint Evaluation
title_short Using Bayesian Evidence Synthesis Methods to Incorporate Real-World Evidence in Surrogate Endpoint Evaluation
title_sort using bayesian evidence synthesis methods to incorporate real-world evidence in surrogate endpoint evaluation
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36998240
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X231162852
work_keys_str_mv AT wheatonlorna usingbayesianevidencesynthesismethodstoincorporaterealworldevidenceinsurrogateendpointevaluation
AT papanikosanastasios usingbayesianevidencesynthesismethodstoincorporaterealworldevidenceinsurrogateendpointevaluation
AT thomasanne usingbayesianevidencesynthesismethodstoincorporaterealworldevidenceinsurrogateendpointevaluation
AT bujkiewiczsylwia usingbayesianevidencesynthesismethodstoincorporaterealworldevidenceinsurrogateendpointevaluation