Cargando…

Sensitivity Analysis of a 6 MeV Photon Beam Monte Carlo Model

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to optimize efficiency in Monte Carlo (MC) simulation using sensitivity analysis of a beam model. METHODS: The BEAMnrc-based model of 6 MV beam of a Siemens Primus linac was developed. For sensitivity analysis, the effect of the electron source, treatment head, and virtu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shami, Nahid, Atarod, Maryam, Shokrani, Parvaneh, Najafizade, Nadia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37448550
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.jmss_152_21
_version_ 1785071304704000000
author Shami, Nahid
Atarod, Maryam
Shokrani, Parvaneh
Najafizade, Nadia
author_facet Shami, Nahid
Atarod, Maryam
Shokrani, Parvaneh
Najafizade, Nadia
author_sort Shami, Nahid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to optimize efficiency in Monte Carlo (MC) simulation using sensitivity analysis of a beam model. METHODS: The BEAMnrc-based model of 6 MV beam of a Siemens Primus linac was developed. For sensitivity analysis, the effect of the electron source, treatment head, and virtual phantom specifications on calculated percent depth dose (PDD) and lateral dose profiles was evaluated. RESULTS: The optimum mean energy (E) and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the intensity distribution of the electron beam were calculated as 6.7 MeV and 3 mm, respectively. Increasing E from 6.1 to 6.7 MeV, increased the PDD in the fall-off region by 4.70% and decreased the lateral profile by 8.76%. Changing the FWHM had a significant effect on the buildup region of PDD and the horns and out-of-field regions of the lateral profile. Increasing the collimators opening by 0.5 mm, PDD increased by 2.13% and the central and penumbra regions of profiles decreased by 1.98% and 11.40% respectively. Collimator properties such as thickness and density were effective in changing the penumbra (11.32% for 0.25 cm increment) and the out-of-field (22.82% for 3 g/cm(3)) regions of the lateral profiles. CONCLUSION: Analysis of a 6 MV model showed that PDD profiles were more sensitive to changes in energy than to FWHM of the electron source. The lateral profiles were sensitive to E, FWHM, and collimator opening. The density of the collimator affected only the out-of-field region of lateral profiles. The findings of this study may be used to make benchmarking of an MC beam model more efficient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10336916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103369162023-07-13 Sensitivity Analysis of a 6 MeV Photon Beam Monte Carlo Model Shami, Nahid Atarod, Maryam Shokrani, Parvaneh Najafizade, Nadia J Med Signals Sens Original Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to optimize efficiency in Monte Carlo (MC) simulation using sensitivity analysis of a beam model. METHODS: The BEAMnrc-based model of 6 MV beam of a Siemens Primus linac was developed. For sensitivity analysis, the effect of the electron source, treatment head, and virtual phantom specifications on calculated percent depth dose (PDD) and lateral dose profiles was evaluated. RESULTS: The optimum mean energy (E) and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the intensity distribution of the electron beam were calculated as 6.7 MeV and 3 mm, respectively. Increasing E from 6.1 to 6.7 MeV, increased the PDD in the fall-off region by 4.70% and decreased the lateral profile by 8.76%. Changing the FWHM had a significant effect on the buildup region of PDD and the horns and out-of-field regions of the lateral profile. Increasing the collimators opening by 0.5 mm, PDD increased by 2.13% and the central and penumbra regions of profiles decreased by 1.98% and 11.40% respectively. Collimator properties such as thickness and density were effective in changing the penumbra (11.32% for 0.25 cm increment) and the out-of-field (22.82% for 3 g/cm(3)) regions of the lateral profiles. CONCLUSION: Analysis of a 6 MV model showed that PDD profiles were more sensitive to changes in energy than to FWHM of the electron source. The lateral profiles were sensitive to E, FWHM, and collimator opening. The density of the collimator affected only the out-of-field region of lateral profiles. The findings of this study may be used to make benchmarking of an MC beam model more efficient. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10336916/ /pubmed/37448550 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.jmss_152_21 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shami, Nahid
Atarod, Maryam
Shokrani, Parvaneh
Najafizade, Nadia
Sensitivity Analysis of a 6 MeV Photon Beam Monte Carlo Model
title Sensitivity Analysis of a 6 MeV Photon Beam Monte Carlo Model
title_full Sensitivity Analysis of a 6 MeV Photon Beam Monte Carlo Model
title_fullStr Sensitivity Analysis of a 6 MeV Photon Beam Monte Carlo Model
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity Analysis of a 6 MeV Photon Beam Monte Carlo Model
title_short Sensitivity Analysis of a 6 MeV Photon Beam Monte Carlo Model
title_sort sensitivity analysis of a 6 mev photon beam monte carlo model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37448550
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.jmss_152_21
work_keys_str_mv AT shaminahid sensitivityanalysisofa6mevphotonbeammontecarlomodel
AT atarodmaryam sensitivityanalysisofa6mevphotonbeammontecarlomodel
AT shokraniparvaneh sensitivityanalysisofa6mevphotonbeammontecarlomodel
AT najafizadenadia sensitivityanalysisofa6mevphotonbeammontecarlomodel