Cargando…

Acceptance, safety and efficacy of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device

BACKGROUND: Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) is safe method of contraception, but with low acceptability rate. Factors that govern acceptability needs to be addressed for increasing its rate. This study was done to assess the acceptance, efficiency, and complications of PPIUCD i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nalini, Neelam, Singh, Bijeta, Jha, Saumaya, Singh, Aditya V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37448945
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1392_22
_version_ 1785071308070977536
author Nalini, Neelam
Singh, Bijeta
Jha, Saumaya
Singh, Aditya V.
author_facet Nalini, Neelam
Singh, Bijeta
Jha, Saumaya
Singh, Aditya V.
author_sort Nalini, Neelam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) is safe method of contraception, but with low acceptability rate. Factors that govern acceptability needs to be addressed for increasing its rate. This study was done to assess the acceptance, efficiency, and complications of PPIUCD in tertiary centre of Jharkhand, India. METHODS: This prospective study included antenatal women >34 weeks of gestational age who attended antenatal women in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology between 1st January 2020 to 1(st) September 2020. Details related to age, parity, education, awareness of PPIUCD, reasons for acceptance/refusal of PPIUCD were recorded. The types of insertion were postplacental, postcaesarean, and postabortal. Postinsertion counselling was done for PPIUCD, and women were followed-up at 6 weeks and 10 weeks for assessing complications. RESULTS: The overall acceptance rate was 36.23% (n = 100). The main reasons for rejecting the use of PPIUCD included fear of pain, bleeding, and other complications (59.09%) and COVID-19 (10.23%). In majority (80%), type of insertion was postplacental with postcaesarean in 18% and postabortal in 2%. Complications were present in 14% women that included abdominal pain (8%), heavy menstrual bleeding (6%), infection (4%), thread not visible (1%), and IUCD not located by USG or X-ray (1%). At 6 months, expulsion occurred in 2 women. There was no significant association of age (P = 0.312), religion (P = 1), tribal/non-tribal (P = 1), education level (P = 0.628), and type of insertion (P = 0.356) with complications. At 1 year of follow up, none of the women conceived again showing the efficacy to be 100% as a contraceptive. CONCLUSION: In spite of limited awareness, PPIUCD proved to be an effective and safe method of long-acting reversible contraception. However, it had low rate of acceptability. PPIUCD was related to lesser complications as expulsion occurred in only 2 women at 6 months. Factors such as age, religion, tribal/non-tribal, education level, and type of insertion were not associated with acceptability rate. PPIUCD was 100% effective as a contraceptive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10336930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103369302023-07-13 Acceptance, safety and efficacy of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device Nalini, Neelam Singh, Bijeta Jha, Saumaya Singh, Aditya V. J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) is safe method of contraception, but with low acceptability rate. Factors that govern acceptability needs to be addressed for increasing its rate. This study was done to assess the acceptance, efficiency, and complications of PPIUCD in tertiary centre of Jharkhand, India. METHODS: This prospective study included antenatal women >34 weeks of gestational age who attended antenatal women in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology between 1st January 2020 to 1(st) September 2020. Details related to age, parity, education, awareness of PPIUCD, reasons for acceptance/refusal of PPIUCD were recorded. The types of insertion were postplacental, postcaesarean, and postabortal. Postinsertion counselling was done for PPIUCD, and women were followed-up at 6 weeks and 10 weeks for assessing complications. RESULTS: The overall acceptance rate was 36.23% (n = 100). The main reasons for rejecting the use of PPIUCD included fear of pain, bleeding, and other complications (59.09%) and COVID-19 (10.23%). In majority (80%), type of insertion was postplacental with postcaesarean in 18% and postabortal in 2%. Complications were present in 14% women that included abdominal pain (8%), heavy menstrual bleeding (6%), infection (4%), thread not visible (1%), and IUCD not located by USG or X-ray (1%). At 6 months, expulsion occurred in 2 women. There was no significant association of age (P = 0.312), religion (P = 1), tribal/non-tribal (P = 1), education level (P = 0.628), and type of insertion (P = 0.356) with complications. At 1 year of follow up, none of the women conceived again showing the efficacy to be 100% as a contraceptive. CONCLUSION: In spite of limited awareness, PPIUCD proved to be an effective and safe method of long-acting reversible contraception. However, it had low rate of acceptability. PPIUCD was related to lesser complications as expulsion occurred in only 2 women at 6 months. Factors such as age, religion, tribal/non-tribal, education level, and type of insertion were not associated with acceptability rate. PPIUCD was 100% effective as a contraceptive. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-05 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10336930/ /pubmed/37448945 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1392_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nalini, Neelam
Singh, Bijeta
Jha, Saumaya
Singh, Aditya V.
Acceptance, safety and efficacy of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device
title Acceptance, safety and efficacy of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device
title_full Acceptance, safety and efficacy of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device
title_fullStr Acceptance, safety and efficacy of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device
title_full_unstemmed Acceptance, safety and efficacy of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device
title_short Acceptance, safety and efficacy of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device
title_sort acceptance, safety and efficacy of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37448945
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1392_22
work_keys_str_mv AT nalinineelam acceptancesafetyandefficacyofpostpartumintrauterinecontraceptivedevice
AT singhbijeta acceptancesafetyandefficacyofpostpartumintrauterinecontraceptivedevice
AT jhasaumaya acceptancesafetyandefficacyofpostpartumintrauterinecontraceptivedevice
AT singhadityav acceptancesafetyandefficacyofpostpartumintrauterinecontraceptivedevice