Cargando…

Cystoisospora suis in Portugal: an observational study of prevalence, management, and risk factors

BACKGROUND: Neonatal coccidiosis is a common and important disease of suckling piglets in modern farming caused by Cystoisospora suis. Prevalence rates are high, namely, in Portugal, although no recent data are available. The metaphylactic administration of a single dose of toltrazuril and hygienic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nunes, Tiago, Skampardonis, Vassilis, Costa, Francisco, da Conceição, Maria Antónia, Sperling, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00328-8
_version_ 1785071352511725568
author Nunes, Tiago
Skampardonis, Vassilis
Costa, Francisco
da Conceição, Maria Antónia
Sperling, Daniel
author_facet Nunes, Tiago
Skampardonis, Vassilis
Costa, Francisco
da Conceição, Maria Antónia
Sperling, Daniel
author_sort Nunes, Tiago
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neonatal coccidiosis is a common and important disease of suckling piglets in modern farming caused by Cystoisospora suis. Prevalence rates are high, namely, in Portugal, although no recent data are available. The metaphylactic administration of a single dose of toltrazuril and hygienic measures are the backbone of control strategies on positive farms. However, several studies have shown that these programs are not always effective, underlining the need to revise the risk factors and control strategies currently applied. The present study evaluated C. suis prevalence on Portuguese farms and assessed the risk factors associated with facilities and farm rearing practices. RESULTS: From the 27 tested farms, 23 were positive to Cystoisopora suis (85.2%). In total, 258 litters were sampled (accounting for 516 samples—2 samples per litter), with an average of 59.7% of positive litters per positive farm. Faecal pools from litters, in which liquid faeces predominated had a higher probability of containing oocysts than litter pools with mainly solid (Odds Ratio: 9.87; p < 0.0001) or pasty faeces (OR: 7.05; p = 0.001), and samples obtained from younger animals had higher oocyst counts (coefficient: − 0.0720; 95% CI − 0.125; − 0.019). No significant effect of toltrazuril administration was observed on the positivity rate, and none of the tested farms used disinfectants with official claims against parasites and known anticoccidial effects (e.g., cresol-based products). CONCLUSIONS: The C. suis prevalence on Portuguese swine farms appears to be similar to the prevalence found in other European countries. Repeated sampling of the same litter and the use of autofluorescence microscopy after a modified Ritchie technique seems to have increased sensitivity and consequently the detection rate of positive litters. Finally, despite the common use of oral toltrazuril, C. suis control programs appear to not always be effective (based on the detection of oocysts in faecal samples), suggesting the need to revise the control strategies applied in the field, including management factors and choices of disinfectant products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10337132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103371322023-07-13 Cystoisospora suis in Portugal: an observational study of prevalence, management, and risk factors Nunes, Tiago Skampardonis, Vassilis Costa, Francisco da Conceição, Maria Antónia Sperling, Daniel Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: Neonatal coccidiosis is a common and important disease of suckling piglets in modern farming caused by Cystoisospora suis. Prevalence rates are high, namely, in Portugal, although no recent data are available. The metaphylactic administration of a single dose of toltrazuril and hygienic measures are the backbone of control strategies on positive farms. However, several studies have shown that these programs are not always effective, underlining the need to revise the risk factors and control strategies currently applied. The present study evaluated C. suis prevalence on Portuguese farms and assessed the risk factors associated with facilities and farm rearing practices. RESULTS: From the 27 tested farms, 23 were positive to Cystoisopora suis (85.2%). In total, 258 litters were sampled (accounting for 516 samples—2 samples per litter), with an average of 59.7% of positive litters per positive farm. Faecal pools from litters, in which liquid faeces predominated had a higher probability of containing oocysts than litter pools with mainly solid (Odds Ratio: 9.87; p < 0.0001) or pasty faeces (OR: 7.05; p = 0.001), and samples obtained from younger animals had higher oocyst counts (coefficient: − 0.0720; 95% CI − 0.125; − 0.019). No significant effect of toltrazuril administration was observed on the positivity rate, and none of the tested farms used disinfectants with official claims against parasites and known anticoccidial effects (e.g., cresol-based products). CONCLUSIONS: The C. suis prevalence on Portuguese swine farms appears to be similar to the prevalence found in other European countries. Repeated sampling of the same litter and the use of autofluorescence microscopy after a modified Ritchie technique seems to have increased sensitivity and consequently the detection rate of positive litters. Finally, despite the common use of oral toltrazuril, C. suis control programs appear to not always be effective (based on the detection of oocysts in faecal samples), suggesting the need to revise the control strategies applied in the field, including management factors and choices of disinfectant products. BioMed Central 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10337132/ /pubmed/37438843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00328-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nunes, Tiago
Skampardonis, Vassilis
Costa, Francisco
da Conceição, Maria Antónia
Sperling, Daniel
Cystoisospora suis in Portugal: an observational study of prevalence, management, and risk factors
title Cystoisospora suis in Portugal: an observational study of prevalence, management, and risk factors
title_full Cystoisospora suis in Portugal: an observational study of prevalence, management, and risk factors
title_fullStr Cystoisospora suis in Portugal: an observational study of prevalence, management, and risk factors
title_full_unstemmed Cystoisospora suis in Portugal: an observational study of prevalence, management, and risk factors
title_short Cystoisospora suis in Portugal: an observational study of prevalence, management, and risk factors
title_sort cystoisospora suis in portugal: an observational study of prevalence, management, and risk factors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00328-8
work_keys_str_mv AT nunestiago cystoisosporasuisinportugalanobservationalstudyofprevalencemanagementandriskfactors
AT skampardonisvassilis cystoisosporasuisinportugalanobservationalstudyofprevalencemanagementandriskfactors
AT costafrancisco cystoisosporasuisinportugalanobservationalstudyofprevalencemanagementandriskfactors
AT daconceicaomariaantonia cystoisosporasuisinportugalanobservationalstudyofprevalencemanagementandriskfactors
AT sperlingdaniel cystoisosporasuisinportugalanobservationalstudyofprevalencemanagementandriskfactors