Cargando…
Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Deprescribing, defined as discontinuing or reducing the dose of medications that are no longer needed or for which the risks outweigh the benefits is a way to reduce polypharmacy. In 2022, the US Deprescribing Research Network (USDeN) published recommendations concerning the measurement...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04155-y |
_version_ | 1785071360494534656 |
---|---|
author | Nizet, Pierre Evin, Adrien Brociero, Emma Vigneau, Caroline Victorri Huon, Jean-François |
author_facet | Nizet, Pierre Evin, Adrien Brociero, Emma Vigneau, Caroline Victorri Huon, Jean-François |
author_sort | Nizet, Pierre |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Deprescribing, defined as discontinuing or reducing the dose of medications that are no longer needed or for which the risks outweigh the benefits is a way to reduce polypharmacy. In 2022, the US Deprescribing Research Network (USDeN) published recommendations concerning the measurement of outcomes for deprescribing intervention studies. The objectives of this systematic review were to identify the outcome categories used in deprescribing intervention trials and to relate them to the previously published recommendations. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, and the Cochrane library from January 2012 through January 2022. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials evaluating a deprescribing intervention. After data extraction, outcomes were categorized by type: medication outcomes, clinical outcomes, system outcomes, implementation outcomes, and other outcomes based on the previously published recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were included. The majority of studies focused on older adults in nursing homes and targeted inappropriate medications or polypharmacy. In 20 studies, the intervention was a medication review; in seven studies, the intervention was educational or informative; and three studies based their intervention on motivational interviewing or patient empowerment. Thirty-one studies presented a medication outcome (primary outcome in 26 studies), 25 a clinical outcome, 18 a system outcome, and seven an implementation outcome. Only three studies presented all four types of outcomes, and 10 studies presented three types of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an update on the implementation of gold standard deprescribing studies in clinical practice. Implementation outcomes need to be developed and specified to facilitate the implementation of these practices on a larger scale and clinical outcome need to be prioritized. Finally, this review provides new elements for future real-life deprescribing studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-04155-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10337166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103371662023-07-13 Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review Nizet, Pierre Evin, Adrien Brociero, Emma Vigneau, Caroline Victorri Huon, Jean-François BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Deprescribing, defined as discontinuing or reducing the dose of medications that are no longer needed or for which the risks outweigh the benefits is a way to reduce polypharmacy. In 2022, the US Deprescribing Research Network (USDeN) published recommendations concerning the measurement of outcomes for deprescribing intervention studies. The objectives of this systematic review were to identify the outcome categories used in deprescribing intervention trials and to relate them to the previously published recommendations. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, and the Cochrane library from January 2012 through January 2022. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials evaluating a deprescribing intervention. After data extraction, outcomes were categorized by type: medication outcomes, clinical outcomes, system outcomes, implementation outcomes, and other outcomes based on the previously published recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were included. The majority of studies focused on older adults in nursing homes and targeted inappropriate medications or polypharmacy. In 20 studies, the intervention was a medication review; in seven studies, the intervention was educational or informative; and three studies based their intervention on motivational interviewing or patient empowerment. Thirty-one studies presented a medication outcome (primary outcome in 26 studies), 25 a clinical outcome, 18 a system outcome, and seven an implementation outcome. Only three studies presented all four types of outcomes, and 10 studies presented three types of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an update on the implementation of gold standard deprescribing studies in clinical practice. Implementation outcomes need to be developed and specified to facilitate the implementation of these practices on a larger scale and clinical outcome need to be prioritized. Finally, this review provides new elements for future real-life deprescribing studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-04155-y. BioMed Central 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10337166/ /pubmed/37438697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04155-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Nizet, Pierre Evin, Adrien Brociero, Emma Vigneau, Caroline Victorri Huon, Jean-François Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review |
title | Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review |
title_full | Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review |
title_short | Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review |
title_sort | outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04155-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nizetpierre outcomesindeprescribingimplementationtrialsandcompliancewithexpertrecommendationsasystematicreview AT evinadrien outcomesindeprescribingimplementationtrialsandcompliancewithexpertrecommendationsasystematicreview AT brocieroemma outcomesindeprescribingimplementationtrialsandcompliancewithexpertrecommendationsasystematicreview AT vigneaucarolinevictorri outcomesindeprescribingimplementationtrialsandcompliancewithexpertrecommendationsasystematicreview AT huonjeanfrancois outcomesindeprescribingimplementationtrialsandcompliancewithexpertrecommendationsasystematicreview |