Cargando…

Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Deprescribing, defined as discontinuing or reducing the dose of medications that are no longer needed or for which the risks outweigh the benefits is a way to reduce polypharmacy. In 2022, the US Deprescribing Research Network (USDeN) published recommendations concerning the measurement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nizet, Pierre, Evin, Adrien, Brociero, Emma, Vigneau, Caroline Victorri, Huon, Jean-François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04155-y
_version_ 1785071360494534656
author Nizet, Pierre
Evin, Adrien
Brociero, Emma
Vigneau, Caroline Victorri
Huon, Jean-François
author_facet Nizet, Pierre
Evin, Adrien
Brociero, Emma
Vigneau, Caroline Victorri
Huon, Jean-François
author_sort Nizet, Pierre
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deprescribing, defined as discontinuing or reducing the dose of medications that are no longer needed or for which the risks outweigh the benefits is a way to reduce polypharmacy. In 2022, the US Deprescribing Research Network (USDeN) published recommendations concerning the measurement of outcomes for deprescribing intervention studies. The objectives of this systematic review were to identify the outcome categories used in deprescribing intervention trials and to relate them to the previously published recommendations. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, and the Cochrane library from January 2012 through January 2022. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials evaluating a deprescribing intervention. After data extraction, outcomes were categorized by type: medication outcomes, clinical outcomes, system outcomes, implementation outcomes, and other outcomes based on the previously published recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were included. The majority of studies focused on older adults in nursing homes and targeted inappropriate medications or polypharmacy. In 20 studies, the intervention was a medication review; in seven studies, the intervention was educational or informative; and three studies based their intervention on motivational interviewing or patient empowerment. Thirty-one studies presented a medication outcome (primary outcome in 26 studies), 25 a clinical outcome, 18 a system outcome, and seven an implementation outcome. Only three studies presented all four types of outcomes, and 10 studies presented three types of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an update on the implementation of gold standard deprescribing studies in clinical practice. Implementation outcomes need to be developed and specified to facilitate the implementation of these practices on a larger scale and clinical outcome need to be prioritized. Finally, this review provides new elements for future real-life deprescribing studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-04155-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10337166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103371662023-07-13 Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review Nizet, Pierre Evin, Adrien Brociero, Emma Vigneau, Caroline Victorri Huon, Jean-François BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Deprescribing, defined as discontinuing or reducing the dose of medications that are no longer needed or for which the risks outweigh the benefits is a way to reduce polypharmacy. In 2022, the US Deprescribing Research Network (USDeN) published recommendations concerning the measurement of outcomes for deprescribing intervention studies. The objectives of this systematic review were to identify the outcome categories used in deprescribing intervention trials and to relate them to the previously published recommendations. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, and the Cochrane library from January 2012 through January 2022. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials evaluating a deprescribing intervention. After data extraction, outcomes were categorized by type: medication outcomes, clinical outcomes, system outcomes, implementation outcomes, and other outcomes based on the previously published recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were included. The majority of studies focused on older adults in nursing homes and targeted inappropriate medications or polypharmacy. In 20 studies, the intervention was a medication review; in seven studies, the intervention was educational or informative; and three studies based their intervention on motivational interviewing or patient empowerment. Thirty-one studies presented a medication outcome (primary outcome in 26 studies), 25 a clinical outcome, 18 a system outcome, and seven an implementation outcome. Only three studies presented all four types of outcomes, and 10 studies presented three types of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an update on the implementation of gold standard deprescribing studies in clinical practice. Implementation outcomes need to be developed and specified to facilitate the implementation of these practices on a larger scale and clinical outcome need to be prioritized. Finally, this review provides new elements for future real-life deprescribing studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-04155-y. BioMed Central 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10337166/ /pubmed/37438697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04155-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nizet, Pierre
Evin, Adrien
Brociero, Emma
Vigneau, Caroline Victorri
Huon, Jean-François
Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review
title Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review
title_full Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review
title_fullStr Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review
title_short Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review
title_sort outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04155-y
work_keys_str_mv AT nizetpierre outcomesindeprescribingimplementationtrialsandcompliancewithexpertrecommendationsasystematicreview
AT evinadrien outcomesindeprescribingimplementationtrialsandcompliancewithexpertrecommendationsasystematicreview
AT brocieroemma outcomesindeprescribingimplementationtrialsandcompliancewithexpertrecommendationsasystematicreview
AT vigneaucarolinevictorri outcomesindeprescribingimplementationtrialsandcompliancewithexpertrecommendationsasystematicreview
AT huonjeanfrancois outcomesindeprescribingimplementationtrialsandcompliancewithexpertrecommendationsasystematicreview