Cargando…

Staff perceptions of factors affecting the use of RAS-DS to support collaborative mental health practice

BACKGROUND: The Recovery Assessment Scale: Domains and Stages (RAS-DS) was designed to be both a recovery outcome measure and a tool to enhance service-user control over their recovery journey. While extensively and globally used in mental health services for the former purpose, routine use for the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Honey, Anne, Hancock, Nicola, Scanlan, Justin Newton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04996-2
_version_ 1785071361674182656
author Honey, Anne
Hancock, Nicola
Scanlan, Justin Newton
author_facet Honey, Anne
Hancock, Nicola
Scanlan, Justin Newton
author_sort Honey, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Recovery Assessment Scale: Domains and Stages (RAS-DS) was designed to be both a recovery outcome measure and a tool to enhance service-user control over their recovery journey. While extensively and globally used in mental health services for the former purpose, routine use for the latter purpose is yet to be realised. The aim of this study was to identify barriers, facilitators and additional supports needed for RAS-DS to be used to support service user participation, goal setting and recovery action planning. METHODS: An online survey was conducted of mental health workers who had engaged with RAS-DS, including fixed choice and open-ended questions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and interpretive content analysis respectively. RESULTS: The 65 respondents reported more frequent use of RAS-DS as an outcome measure than as a collaboration tool and more than half reported difficulties in using it in this way. Factors that they described as influencing the use of RAS-DS as a tool for collaboration and support included: previous experiences with RAS-DS; organisational supports and policies; awareness of the RAS-DS amongst colleagues; RAS-DS related training and support; staff time and capacity; the format of RAS-DS; service user population or context; and respondents’ own active efforts. CONCLUSIONS: Extending the use of RAS-DS, an already widely used tool, to routinely support recovery-oriented practice has both efficiency and service user empowerment benefits. However further work is needed to enable this including: provision of co-designed, accessible training resources; a user platform including built in guidance; and strategies to promote management understanding and valuing of the enhanced recovery-orientation opportunities inherent in RAS-DS use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10337171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103371712023-07-13 Staff perceptions of factors affecting the use of RAS-DS to support collaborative mental health practice Honey, Anne Hancock, Nicola Scanlan, Justin Newton BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: The Recovery Assessment Scale: Domains and Stages (RAS-DS) was designed to be both a recovery outcome measure and a tool to enhance service-user control over their recovery journey. While extensively and globally used in mental health services for the former purpose, routine use for the latter purpose is yet to be realised. The aim of this study was to identify barriers, facilitators and additional supports needed for RAS-DS to be used to support service user participation, goal setting and recovery action planning. METHODS: An online survey was conducted of mental health workers who had engaged with RAS-DS, including fixed choice and open-ended questions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and interpretive content analysis respectively. RESULTS: The 65 respondents reported more frequent use of RAS-DS as an outcome measure than as a collaboration tool and more than half reported difficulties in using it in this way. Factors that they described as influencing the use of RAS-DS as a tool for collaboration and support included: previous experiences with RAS-DS; organisational supports and policies; awareness of the RAS-DS amongst colleagues; RAS-DS related training and support; staff time and capacity; the format of RAS-DS; service user population or context; and respondents’ own active efforts. CONCLUSIONS: Extending the use of RAS-DS, an already widely used tool, to routinely support recovery-oriented practice has both efficiency and service user empowerment benefits. However further work is needed to enable this including: provision of co-designed, accessible training resources; a user platform including built in guidance; and strategies to promote management understanding and valuing of the enhanced recovery-orientation opportunities inherent in RAS-DS use. BioMed Central 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10337171/ /pubmed/37438725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04996-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Honey, Anne
Hancock, Nicola
Scanlan, Justin Newton
Staff perceptions of factors affecting the use of RAS-DS to support collaborative mental health practice
title Staff perceptions of factors affecting the use of RAS-DS to support collaborative mental health practice
title_full Staff perceptions of factors affecting the use of RAS-DS to support collaborative mental health practice
title_fullStr Staff perceptions of factors affecting the use of RAS-DS to support collaborative mental health practice
title_full_unstemmed Staff perceptions of factors affecting the use of RAS-DS to support collaborative mental health practice
title_short Staff perceptions of factors affecting the use of RAS-DS to support collaborative mental health practice
title_sort staff perceptions of factors affecting the use of ras-ds to support collaborative mental health practice
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04996-2
work_keys_str_mv AT honeyanne staffperceptionsoffactorsaffectingtheuseofrasdstosupportcollaborativementalhealthpractice
AT hancocknicola staffperceptionsoffactorsaffectingtheuseofrasdstosupportcollaborativementalhealthpractice
AT scanlanjustinnewton staffperceptionsoffactorsaffectingtheuseofrasdstosupportcollaborativementalhealthpractice