Cargando…
Barriers to Telemedicine Use: Qualitative Analysis of Provider Perspectives During the COVID-19 Pandemic
BACKGROUND: Though telemedicine is a promising approach for removing barriers to care and improving access for patients, telemedicine use for many medical specialties has decreased from its peak during the acute COVID-19 public health crisis. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to the mainte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37358887 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39249 |
_version_ | 1785071378882363392 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Milan Berlin, Hanna Rajkumar, Abishek Krein, Sarah L Miller, Rebecca DeVito, Jessie Roy, Jake Punch, Margaret Ellimootti, Chad Peahl, Alex F |
author_facet | Patel, Milan Berlin, Hanna Rajkumar, Abishek Krein, Sarah L Miller, Rebecca DeVito, Jessie Roy, Jake Punch, Margaret Ellimootti, Chad Peahl, Alex F |
author_sort | Patel, Milan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Though telemedicine is a promising approach for removing barriers to care and improving access for patients, telemedicine use for many medical specialties has decreased from its peak during the acute COVID-19 public health crisis. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to the maintenance of web-based visits—one key component of telemedicine—is critical for ensuring the continuous availability of this service for patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe medical providers’ perceived barriers and facilitators to the continued use of web-based visits to inform quality improvement efforts and promote sustainability. METHODS: We performed a qualitative content analysis of free-text responses from a survey of medical providers administered from February 5-14, 2021, at a large, midwestern academic institution, including all providers from medical professions that offered telemedicine (eg, physicians, residents or fellows, nurse practitioners, physicians assistants, or nurses) who completed at least 1 web-based visit from March 20, 2020, to February 14, 2021. The primary outcome was the experience of providing web-based visits, including barriers and facilitators to continued usage of web-based visits. Survey questions included 3 major domains: quality of care, technology, and satisfaction. Responses were coded using qualitative content analysis and further analyzed through a matrix analysis to understand the providers’ perspectives and elucidate key barriers and facilitators of web-based visit usage. RESULTS: Of 2692 eligible providers, 1040 (38.6%) completed the survey, of whom 702 were providers from medical professions that offered telemedicine. These providers spanned 7 health care professions and 47 clinical departments. The most common professions represented were physicians (486/702, 46.7%), residents or fellows (85/702, 8.2%), and nurse practitioners (81/702, 7.8%), while the most common clinical departments were internal medicine (69/702, 6.6%), psychiatry (69/702, 6.6%), and physical medicine and rehabilitation (67/702, 6.4%). The following 4 overarching categories of provider experience with web-based visits emerged: quality of care, patient rapport, visit flow, and equity. Though many providers saw web-based visits as a tool for improving care access, quality, and equity, others shared how appropriate selection of web-based visits, support (eg, patient training, home devices, and broadband access), and institutional and nationwide optimization (eg, relaxation of licensing requirements across state borders and reimbursement for phone-only modalities) were needed to sustain web-based visits. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate key barriers to the maintenance of telemedicine services following the acute public health crisis. These findings can help prioritize the most impactful methods of sustaining and expanding telemedicine availability for patients who prefer this method of care delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10337245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103372452023-07-13 Barriers to Telemedicine Use: Qualitative Analysis of Provider Perspectives During the COVID-19 Pandemic Patel, Milan Berlin, Hanna Rajkumar, Abishek Krein, Sarah L Miller, Rebecca DeVito, Jessie Roy, Jake Punch, Margaret Ellimootti, Chad Peahl, Alex F JMIR Hum Factors Original Paper BACKGROUND: Though telemedicine is a promising approach for removing barriers to care and improving access for patients, telemedicine use for many medical specialties has decreased from its peak during the acute COVID-19 public health crisis. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to the maintenance of web-based visits—one key component of telemedicine—is critical for ensuring the continuous availability of this service for patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe medical providers’ perceived barriers and facilitators to the continued use of web-based visits to inform quality improvement efforts and promote sustainability. METHODS: We performed a qualitative content analysis of free-text responses from a survey of medical providers administered from February 5-14, 2021, at a large, midwestern academic institution, including all providers from medical professions that offered telemedicine (eg, physicians, residents or fellows, nurse practitioners, physicians assistants, or nurses) who completed at least 1 web-based visit from March 20, 2020, to February 14, 2021. The primary outcome was the experience of providing web-based visits, including barriers and facilitators to continued usage of web-based visits. Survey questions included 3 major domains: quality of care, technology, and satisfaction. Responses were coded using qualitative content analysis and further analyzed through a matrix analysis to understand the providers’ perspectives and elucidate key barriers and facilitators of web-based visit usage. RESULTS: Of 2692 eligible providers, 1040 (38.6%) completed the survey, of whom 702 were providers from medical professions that offered telemedicine. These providers spanned 7 health care professions and 47 clinical departments. The most common professions represented were physicians (486/702, 46.7%), residents or fellows (85/702, 8.2%), and nurse practitioners (81/702, 7.8%), while the most common clinical departments were internal medicine (69/702, 6.6%), psychiatry (69/702, 6.6%), and physical medicine and rehabilitation (67/702, 6.4%). The following 4 overarching categories of provider experience with web-based visits emerged: quality of care, patient rapport, visit flow, and equity. Though many providers saw web-based visits as a tool for improving care access, quality, and equity, others shared how appropriate selection of web-based visits, support (eg, patient training, home devices, and broadband access), and institutional and nationwide optimization (eg, relaxation of licensing requirements across state borders and reimbursement for phone-only modalities) were needed to sustain web-based visits. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate key barriers to the maintenance of telemedicine services following the acute public health crisis. These findings can help prioritize the most impactful methods of sustaining and expanding telemedicine availability for patients who prefer this method of care delivery. JMIR Publications 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10337245/ /pubmed/37358887 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39249 Text en ©Milan Patel, Hanna Berlin, Abishek Rajkumar, Sarah L Krein, Rebecca Miller, Jessie DeVito, Jake Roy, Margaret Punch, Chad Ellimootti, Alex F Peahl. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 26.06.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Human Factors, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://humanfactors.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Patel, Milan Berlin, Hanna Rajkumar, Abishek Krein, Sarah L Miller, Rebecca DeVito, Jessie Roy, Jake Punch, Margaret Ellimootti, Chad Peahl, Alex F Barriers to Telemedicine Use: Qualitative Analysis of Provider Perspectives During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title | Barriers to Telemedicine Use: Qualitative Analysis of Provider Perspectives During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full | Barriers to Telemedicine Use: Qualitative Analysis of Provider Perspectives During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_fullStr | Barriers to Telemedicine Use: Qualitative Analysis of Provider Perspectives During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers to Telemedicine Use: Qualitative Analysis of Provider Perspectives During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_short | Barriers to Telemedicine Use: Qualitative Analysis of Provider Perspectives During the COVID-19 Pandemic |
title_sort | barriers to telemedicine use: qualitative analysis of provider perspectives during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37358887 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39249 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelmilan barrierstotelemedicineusequalitativeanalysisofproviderperspectivesduringthecovid19pandemic AT berlinhanna barrierstotelemedicineusequalitativeanalysisofproviderperspectivesduringthecovid19pandemic AT rajkumarabishek barrierstotelemedicineusequalitativeanalysisofproviderperspectivesduringthecovid19pandemic AT kreinsarahl barrierstotelemedicineusequalitativeanalysisofproviderperspectivesduringthecovid19pandemic AT millerrebecca barrierstotelemedicineusequalitativeanalysisofproviderperspectivesduringthecovid19pandemic AT devitojessie barrierstotelemedicineusequalitativeanalysisofproviderperspectivesduringthecovid19pandemic AT royjake barrierstotelemedicineusequalitativeanalysisofproviderperspectivesduringthecovid19pandemic AT punchmargaret barrierstotelemedicineusequalitativeanalysisofproviderperspectivesduringthecovid19pandemic AT ellimoottichad barrierstotelemedicineusequalitativeanalysisofproviderperspectivesduringthecovid19pandemic AT peahlalexf barrierstotelemedicineusequalitativeanalysisofproviderperspectivesduringthecovid19pandemic |