Cargando…

Evaluating Declines in Compliance With Ecological Momentary Assessment in Longitudinal Health Behavior Research: Analyses From a Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is increasingly used to evaluate behavioral health processes over extended time periods. The validity of EMA for providing representative, real-world data with high temporal precision is threatened to the extent that EMA compliance drops over time. O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tonkin, Sarah, Gass, Julie, Wray, Jennifer, Maguin, Eugene, Mahoney, Martin, Colder, Craig, Tiffany, Stephen, Hawk Jr, Larry W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37347538
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43826
_version_ 1785071402501537792
author Tonkin, Sarah
Gass, Julie
Wray, Jennifer
Maguin, Eugene
Mahoney, Martin
Colder, Craig
Tiffany, Stephen
Hawk Jr, Larry W
author_facet Tonkin, Sarah
Gass, Julie
Wray, Jennifer
Maguin, Eugene
Mahoney, Martin
Colder, Craig
Tiffany, Stephen
Hawk Jr, Larry W
author_sort Tonkin, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is increasingly used to evaluate behavioral health processes over extended time periods. The validity of EMA for providing representative, real-world data with high temporal precision is threatened to the extent that EMA compliance drops over time. OBJECTIVE: This research builds on prior short-term studies by evaluating the time course of EMA compliance over 9 weeks and examines predictors of weekly compliance rates among cigarette-using adults. METHODS: A total of 257 daily cigarette-using adults participating in a randomized controlled trial for smoking cessation completed daily smartphone EMA assessments, including 1 scheduled morning assessment and 4 random assessments per day. Weekly EMA compliance was calculated and multilevel modeling assessed the rate of change in compliance over the 9-week assessment period. Participant and study characteristics were examined as predictors of overall compliance and changes in compliance rates over time. RESULTS: Compliance was higher for scheduled morning assessments (86%) than for random assessments (58%) at the beginning of the EMA period (P<.001). EMA compliance declined linearly across weeks, and the rate of decline was greater for morning assessments (2% per week) than for random assessments (1% per week; P<.001). Declines in compliance were stronger for younger participants (P<.001), participants who were employed full-time (P=.03), and participants who subsequently dropped out of the study (P<.001). Overall compliance was higher among White participants compared to Black or African American participants (P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that EMA compliance declines linearly but modestly across lengthy EMA protocols. In general, these data support the validity of EMA for tracking health behavior and hypothesized treatment mechanisms over the course of several months. Future work should target improving compliance among subgroups of participants and investigate the extent to which rapid declines in EMA compliance might prove useful for triggering interventions to prevent study dropout. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03262662; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03262662
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10337346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103373462023-07-13 Evaluating Declines in Compliance With Ecological Momentary Assessment in Longitudinal Health Behavior Research: Analyses From a Clinical Trial Tonkin, Sarah Gass, Julie Wray, Jennifer Maguin, Eugene Mahoney, Martin Colder, Craig Tiffany, Stephen Hawk Jr, Larry W J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is increasingly used to evaluate behavioral health processes over extended time periods. The validity of EMA for providing representative, real-world data with high temporal precision is threatened to the extent that EMA compliance drops over time. OBJECTIVE: This research builds on prior short-term studies by evaluating the time course of EMA compliance over 9 weeks and examines predictors of weekly compliance rates among cigarette-using adults. METHODS: A total of 257 daily cigarette-using adults participating in a randomized controlled trial for smoking cessation completed daily smartphone EMA assessments, including 1 scheduled morning assessment and 4 random assessments per day. Weekly EMA compliance was calculated and multilevel modeling assessed the rate of change in compliance over the 9-week assessment period. Participant and study characteristics were examined as predictors of overall compliance and changes in compliance rates over time. RESULTS: Compliance was higher for scheduled morning assessments (86%) than for random assessments (58%) at the beginning of the EMA period (P<.001). EMA compliance declined linearly across weeks, and the rate of decline was greater for morning assessments (2% per week) than for random assessments (1% per week; P<.001). Declines in compliance were stronger for younger participants (P<.001), participants who were employed full-time (P=.03), and participants who subsequently dropped out of the study (P<.001). Overall compliance was higher among White participants compared to Black or African American participants (P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that EMA compliance declines linearly but modestly across lengthy EMA protocols. In general, these data support the validity of EMA for tracking health behavior and hypothesized treatment mechanisms over the course of several months. Future work should target improving compliance among subgroups of participants and investigate the extent to which rapid declines in EMA compliance might prove useful for triggering interventions to prevent study dropout. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03262662; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03262662 JMIR Publications 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10337346/ /pubmed/37347538 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43826 Text en ©Sarah Tonkin, Julie Gass, Jennifer Wray, Eugene Maguin, Martin Mahoney, Craig Colder, Stephen Tiffany, Larry W Hawk Jr. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 22.06.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Tonkin, Sarah
Gass, Julie
Wray, Jennifer
Maguin, Eugene
Mahoney, Martin
Colder, Craig
Tiffany, Stephen
Hawk Jr, Larry W
Evaluating Declines in Compliance With Ecological Momentary Assessment in Longitudinal Health Behavior Research: Analyses From a Clinical Trial
title Evaluating Declines in Compliance With Ecological Momentary Assessment in Longitudinal Health Behavior Research: Analyses From a Clinical Trial
title_full Evaluating Declines in Compliance With Ecological Momentary Assessment in Longitudinal Health Behavior Research: Analyses From a Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Evaluating Declines in Compliance With Ecological Momentary Assessment in Longitudinal Health Behavior Research: Analyses From a Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Declines in Compliance With Ecological Momentary Assessment in Longitudinal Health Behavior Research: Analyses From a Clinical Trial
title_short Evaluating Declines in Compliance With Ecological Momentary Assessment in Longitudinal Health Behavior Research: Analyses From a Clinical Trial
title_sort evaluating declines in compliance with ecological momentary assessment in longitudinal health behavior research: analyses from a clinical trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37347538
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43826
work_keys_str_mv AT tonkinsarah evaluatingdeclinesincompliancewithecologicalmomentaryassessmentinlongitudinalhealthbehaviorresearchanalysesfromaclinicaltrial
AT gassjulie evaluatingdeclinesincompliancewithecologicalmomentaryassessmentinlongitudinalhealthbehaviorresearchanalysesfromaclinicaltrial
AT wrayjennifer evaluatingdeclinesincompliancewithecologicalmomentaryassessmentinlongitudinalhealthbehaviorresearchanalysesfromaclinicaltrial
AT maguineugene evaluatingdeclinesincompliancewithecologicalmomentaryassessmentinlongitudinalhealthbehaviorresearchanalysesfromaclinicaltrial
AT mahoneymartin evaluatingdeclinesincompliancewithecologicalmomentaryassessmentinlongitudinalhealthbehaviorresearchanalysesfromaclinicaltrial
AT coldercraig evaluatingdeclinesincompliancewithecologicalmomentaryassessmentinlongitudinalhealthbehaviorresearchanalysesfromaclinicaltrial
AT tiffanystephen evaluatingdeclinesincompliancewithecologicalmomentaryassessmentinlongitudinalhealthbehaviorresearchanalysesfromaclinicaltrial
AT hawkjrlarryw evaluatingdeclinesincompliancewithecologicalmomentaryassessmentinlongitudinalhealthbehaviorresearchanalysesfromaclinicaltrial