Cargando…

Graded Response Model Analysis and Computer Adaptive Test Simulation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21: Evaluation and Validation Study

BACKGROUND: The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) is a mental health screening tool with conflicting studies regarding its factor structure. No studies have yet attempted to develop a computer adaptive test (CAT) version of it. OBJECTIVE: This study calibrated items for, and simulated, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraska, Jake, Bell, Karen, Costello, Shane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37347530
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/45334
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) is a mental health screening tool with conflicting studies regarding its factor structure. No studies have yet attempted to develop a computer adaptive test (CAT) version of it. OBJECTIVE: This study calibrated items for, and simulated, a DASS-21 CAT using a nonclinical sample. METHODS: An evaluation sample (n=580) was used to evaluate the DASS-21 scales via confirmatory factor analysis, Mokken analysis, and graded response modeling. A CAT was simulated with a validation sample (n=248) and a simulated sample (n=10,000) to confirm the generalizability of the model developed. RESULTS: A bifactor model, also known as the “quadripartite” model (1 general factor with 3 specific factors) in the context of the DASS-21, displayed good fit. All scales displayed acceptable fit with the graded response model. Simulation of 3 unidimensional (depression, anxiety, and stress) CATs resulted in an average 17% to 48% reduction in items administered when a reliability of 0.80 was acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: This study clarifies previous conflicting findings regarding the DASS-21 factor structure and suggests that the quadripartite model for the DASS-21 items fits best. Item response theory modeling suggests that the items measure their respective constructs best between 0θ and 3θ (mild to moderate severity).