Cargando…

Graded Response Model Analysis and Computer Adaptive Test Simulation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21: Evaluation and Validation Study

BACKGROUND: The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) is a mental health screening tool with conflicting studies regarding its factor structure. No studies have yet attempted to develop a computer adaptive test (CAT) version of it. OBJECTIVE: This study calibrated items for, and simulated, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraska, Jake, Bell, Karen, Costello, Shane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37347530
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/45334
_version_ 1785071428361519104
author Kraska, Jake
Bell, Karen
Costello, Shane
author_facet Kraska, Jake
Bell, Karen
Costello, Shane
author_sort Kraska, Jake
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) is a mental health screening tool with conflicting studies regarding its factor structure. No studies have yet attempted to develop a computer adaptive test (CAT) version of it. OBJECTIVE: This study calibrated items for, and simulated, a DASS-21 CAT using a nonclinical sample. METHODS: An evaluation sample (n=580) was used to evaluate the DASS-21 scales via confirmatory factor analysis, Mokken analysis, and graded response modeling. A CAT was simulated with a validation sample (n=248) and a simulated sample (n=10,000) to confirm the generalizability of the model developed. RESULTS: A bifactor model, also known as the “quadripartite” model (1 general factor with 3 specific factors) in the context of the DASS-21, displayed good fit. All scales displayed acceptable fit with the graded response model. Simulation of 3 unidimensional (depression, anxiety, and stress) CATs resulted in an average 17% to 48% reduction in items administered when a reliability of 0.80 was acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: This study clarifies previous conflicting findings regarding the DASS-21 factor structure and suggests that the quadripartite model for the DASS-21 items fits best. Item response theory modeling suggests that the items measure their respective constructs best between 0θ and 3θ (mild to moderate severity).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10337454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103374542023-07-13 Graded Response Model Analysis and Computer Adaptive Test Simulation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21: Evaluation and Validation Study Kraska, Jake Bell, Karen Costello, Shane J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) is a mental health screening tool with conflicting studies regarding its factor structure. No studies have yet attempted to develop a computer adaptive test (CAT) version of it. OBJECTIVE: This study calibrated items for, and simulated, a DASS-21 CAT using a nonclinical sample. METHODS: An evaluation sample (n=580) was used to evaluate the DASS-21 scales via confirmatory factor analysis, Mokken analysis, and graded response modeling. A CAT was simulated with a validation sample (n=248) and a simulated sample (n=10,000) to confirm the generalizability of the model developed. RESULTS: A bifactor model, also known as the “quadripartite” model (1 general factor with 3 specific factors) in the context of the DASS-21, displayed good fit. All scales displayed acceptable fit with the graded response model. Simulation of 3 unidimensional (depression, anxiety, and stress) CATs resulted in an average 17% to 48% reduction in items administered when a reliability of 0.80 was acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: This study clarifies previous conflicting findings regarding the DASS-21 factor structure and suggests that the quadripartite model for the DASS-21 items fits best. Item response theory modeling suggests that the items measure their respective constructs best between 0θ and 3θ (mild to moderate severity). JMIR Publications 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10337454/ /pubmed/37347530 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/45334 Text en ©Jake Kraska, Karen Bell, Shane Costello. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 22.06.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kraska, Jake
Bell, Karen
Costello, Shane
Graded Response Model Analysis and Computer Adaptive Test Simulation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21: Evaluation and Validation Study
title Graded Response Model Analysis and Computer Adaptive Test Simulation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21: Evaluation and Validation Study
title_full Graded Response Model Analysis and Computer Adaptive Test Simulation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21: Evaluation and Validation Study
title_fullStr Graded Response Model Analysis and Computer Adaptive Test Simulation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21: Evaluation and Validation Study
title_full_unstemmed Graded Response Model Analysis and Computer Adaptive Test Simulation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21: Evaluation and Validation Study
title_short Graded Response Model Analysis and Computer Adaptive Test Simulation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21: Evaluation and Validation Study
title_sort graded response model analysis and computer adaptive test simulation of the depression anxiety stress scale 21: evaluation and validation study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37347530
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/45334
work_keys_str_mv AT kraskajake gradedresponsemodelanalysisandcomputeradaptivetestsimulationofthedepressionanxietystressscale21evaluationandvalidationstudy
AT bellkaren gradedresponsemodelanalysisandcomputeradaptivetestsimulationofthedepressionanxietystressscale21evaluationandvalidationstudy
AT costelloshane gradedresponsemodelanalysisandcomputeradaptivetestsimulationofthedepressionanxietystressscale21evaluationandvalidationstudy