Cargando…

COMPARING THE EFFICIENCY OF A REAL-TIME ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INSTRUCTOR TO HUMAN EXPERT INSTRUCTORS IN SIMULATED SURGICAL TECHNICAL SKILLS TRAINING– A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

BTFC travel award recipient Artificial intelligence systems provide risk-free training on realistically simulated patient cases and objective assessment of surgical technical skills. This randomized controlled study compared a real-time intelligent tutoring system in technical skills learning with h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yilmaz, Recai, Bakhaidar, Mohamad, Alsayegh, Ahmad, Hamdan, Nour Abou, Fazlollahi, Ali M, Agu, Chinyelum, Pachchigar, Puja, Del Maestro, Rolando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337570/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad071.003
_version_ 1785071454863228928
author Yilmaz, Recai
Bakhaidar, Mohamad
Alsayegh, Ahmad
Hamdan, Nour Abou
Fazlollahi, Ali M
Agu, Chinyelum
Pachchigar, Puja
Del Maestro, Rolando
author_facet Yilmaz, Recai
Bakhaidar, Mohamad
Alsayegh, Ahmad
Hamdan, Nour Abou
Fazlollahi, Ali M
Agu, Chinyelum
Pachchigar, Puja
Del Maestro, Rolando
author_sort Yilmaz, Recai
collection PubMed
description BTFC travel award recipient Artificial intelligence systems provide risk-free training on realistically simulated patient cases and objective assessment of surgical technical skills. This randomized controlled study compared a real-time intelligent tutoring system in technical skills learning with human expert instructor-mediated training. METHODS: Ninety-eight medical students performed six simulated brain tumor resections. Participants were randomly allocated into (1)no-real-time feedback, (2)real-time intelligent instruction, and (3)in- person human instruction. All students performed the first repetition without receiving feedback (baseline). Group-1 received visual feedback only after each procedure based on expert benchmarks. Group-2 was instructed by the intelligent system in real-time. After each task, the students were shown their error-video clips generated by this system alongside expert-level demonstrations on how to improve. Group-3 was instructed by human instructors during the tasks. After each task, instructors summarized the areas of improvement and demonstrated correction techniques. Participant performance was scored by the intelligent system and also by blinded experts using OSATS scores. The performance score was compared within groups and between groups to compare learning. RESULTS: Compared to baseline performance, Group-2 and Group-3 significantly improved in the performance score by the third and second repetition, respectively (p<0.01, p=0.01). The between-groups comparison demonstrated that Group-2 scored significantly higher than Group-3 in the fifth repetition (p<0.01). Group-2 achieved significantly higher OSATS scores than Group-1 in the sixth task. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence may facilitate trainee learning by providing equally or more efficient learning when compared to human instruction. These systems may aid in developing competency-based standardized curricula in surgical training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10337570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103375702023-07-13 COMPARING THE EFFICIENCY OF A REAL-TIME ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INSTRUCTOR TO HUMAN EXPERT INSTRUCTORS IN SIMULATED SURGICAL TECHNICAL SKILLS TRAINING– A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL Yilmaz, Recai Bakhaidar, Mohamad Alsayegh, Ahmad Hamdan, Nour Abou Fazlollahi, Ali M Agu, Chinyelum Pachchigar, Puja Del Maestro, Rolando Neurooncol Adv Oral Abstract Presentations BTFC travel award recipient Artificial intelligence systems provide risk-free training on realistically simulated patient cases and objective assessment of surgical technical skills. This randomized controlled study compared a real-time intelligent tutoring system in technical skills learning with human expert instructor-mediated training. METHODS: Ninety-eight medical students performed six simulated brain tumor resections. Participants were randomly allocated into (1)no-real-time feedback, (2)real-time intelligent instruction, and (3)in- person human instruction. All students performed the first repetition without receiving feedback (baseline). Group-1 received visual feedback only after each procedure based on expert benchmarks. Group-2 was instructed by the intelligent system in real-time. After each task, the students were shown their error-video clips generated by this system alongside expert-level demonstrations on how to improve. Group-3 was instructed by human instructors during the tasks. After each task, instructors summarized the areas of improvement and demonstrated correction techniques. Participant performance was scored by the intelligent system and also by blinded experts using OSATS scores. The performance score was compared within groups and between groups to compare learning. RESULTS: Compared to baseline performance, Group-2 and Group-3 significantly improved in the performance score by the third and second repetition, respectively (p<0.01, p=0.01). The between-groups comparison demonstrated that Group-2 scored significantly higher than Group-3 in the fifth repetition (p<0.01). Group-2 achieved significantly higher OSATS scores than Group-1 in the sixth task. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence may facilitate trainee learning by providing equally or more efficient learning when compared to human instruction. These systems may aid in developing competency-based standardized curricula in surgical training. Oxford University Press 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10337570/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad071.003 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Oral Abstract Presentations
Yilmaz, Recai
Bakhaidar, Mohamad
Alsayegh, Ahmad
Hamdan, Nour Abou
Fazlollahi, Ali M
Agu, Chinyelum
Pachchigar, Puja
Del Maestro, Rolando
COMPARING THE EFFICIENCY OF A REAL-TIME ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INSTRUCTOR TO HUMAN EXPERT INSTRUCTORS IN SIMULATED SURGICAL TECHNICAL SKILLS TRAINING– A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
title COMPARING THE EFFICIENCY OF A REAL-TIME ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INSTRUCTOR TO HUMAN EXPERT INSTRUCTORS IN SIMULATED SURGICAL TECHNICAL SKILLS TRAINING– A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
title_full COMPARING THE EFFICIENCY OF A REAL-TIME ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INSTRUCTOR TO HUMAN EXPERT INSTRUCTORS IN SIMULATED SURGICAL TECHNICAL SKILLS TRAINING– A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
title_fullStr COMPARING THE EFFICIENCY OF A REAL-TIME ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INSTRUCTOR TO HUMAN EXPERT INSTRUCTORS IN SIMULATED SURGICAL TECHNICAL SKILLS TRAINING– A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
title_full_unstemmed COMPARING THE EFFICIENCY OF A REAL-TIME ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INSTRUCTOR TO HUMAN EXPERT INSTRUCTORS IN SIMULATED SURGICAL TECHNICAL SKILLS TRAINING– A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
title_short COMPARING THE EFFICIENCY OF A REAL-TIME ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INSTRUCTOR TO HUMAN EXPERT INSTRUCTORS IN SIMULATED SURGICAL TECHNICAL SKILLS TRAINING– A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
title_sort comparing the efficiency of a real-time artificial intelligence instructor to human expert instructors in simulated surgical technical skills training– a randomized controlled trial
topic Oral Abstract Presentations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337570/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad071.003
work_keys_str_mv AT yilmazrecai comparingtheefficiencyofarealtimeartificialintelligenceinstructortohumanexpertinstructorsinsimulatedsurgicaltechnicalskillstrainingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bakhaidarmohamad comparingtheefficiencyofarealtimeartificialintelligenceinstructortohumanexpertinstructorsinsimulatedsurgicaltechnicalskillstrainingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT alsayeghahmad comparingtheefficiencyofarealtimeartificialintelligenceinstructortohumanexpertinstructorsinsimulatedsurgicaltechnicalskillstrainingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hamdannourabou comparingtheefficiencyofarealtimeartificialintelligenceinstructortohumanexpertinstructorsinsimulatedsurgicaltechnicalskillstrainingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fazlollahialim comparingtheefficiencyofarealtimeartificialintelligenceinstructortohumanexpertinstructorsinsimulatedsurgicaltechnicalskillstrainingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aguchinyelum comparingtheefficiencyofarealtimeartificialintelligenceinstructortohumanexpertinstructorsinsimulatedsurgicaltechnicalskillstrainingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pachchigarpuja comparingtheefficiencyofarealtimeartificialintelligenceinstructortohumanexpertinstructorsinsimulatedsurgicaltechnicalskillstrainingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT delmaestrorolando comparingtheefficiencyofarealtimeartificialintelligenceinstructortohumanexpertinstructorsinsimulatedsurgicaltechnicalskillstrainingarandomizedcontrolledtrial