Cargando…
Content Validity of a Novel Scar Assessment Tool Evaluating the Career and Sexual Well-being Impact of Scars
Currently, patient reported outcome scales used to assess scar impact focus solely on psychosocial well-being, symptoms, and appearance. There remains a need to develop a broadened measure of scar impact on patients, focusing on sexual and career aspects. This study investigates the content validity...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37448762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005118 |
Sumario: | Currently, patient reported outcome scales used to assess scar impact focus solely on psychosocial well-being, symptoms, and appearance. There remains a need to develop a broadened measure of scar impact on patients, focusing on sexual and career aspects. This study investigates the content validity of the novel Career and Sexual Well-being (CS) Scar Impact Scale. METHOD: The CS scale contains five questions and was developed from previous patient thematic analysis interviews describing scar impact, and covers self-conscious behavior, new partners, hiding of the scar, being hindered in the workplace, and concerns regarding unprofessional appearance. Cognitive interviews and established guidelines were used to ensure that the scale was comprehensive, reproducible, and easily understandable. RESULTS: In total, 86 patients completed cognitive interviews. Patients had a clear understanding of the questions and elicited their intent in the interviews. An estimated 86% of patients rated the CS scale coverage of scar impact on career and sexual health at a three or above out of four; 95% said the specific instructions were clear, and 92% stated it took them less than 4 minutes to complete the scale. After the first round of interviews, a question about “perception/self-consciousness in a professional environment” was added based on patient suggestions. CONCLUSIONS: The CS scar scale demonstrated face validity, acceptability, and field-readiness through cognitive interviewing of patients at our institution. Sexual well-being and career performance are important yet often neglected themes with which scars should be assessed. Usage of these tools would serve to improve current scar scales. |
---|