Cargando…
A large scale randomized controlled trial on herding in peer-review discussions
Peer review is the backbone of academia and humans constitute a cornerstone of this process, being responsible for reviewing submissions and making the final acceptance/rejection decisions. Given that human decision-making is known to be susceptible to various cognitive biases, it is important to un...
Autores principales: | Stelmakh, Ivan, Rastogi, Charvi, Shah, Nihar B., Singh, Aarti, Daumé, Hal |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10337975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37437010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287443 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cite-seeing and reviewing: A study on citation bias in peer review
por: Stelmakh, Ivan, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
discussion large-scale experiments
por: CERN. Geneva
Publicado: (2021) -
The role of author identities in peer review
por: Shah, Nihar B.
Publicado: (2023) -
Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports
por: Buljan, Ivan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Impact of peer review on discussion of study limitations and strength of claims in randomized trial reports: a before and after study
por: Keserlioglu, Kerem, et al.
Publicado: (2019)