Cargando…

An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator

PURPOSE: Periodic imaging quality assurance (QA) of magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator (MRL) is critical. The feasibility of a new MRL imaging phantom used for QA in the low field was evaluated with automated image analysis of various parameters for accuracy and reproducibility. METHODS A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sohn, James J., Lim, Sara, Das, Indra J., Yadav, Poonam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100462
_version_ 1785071564616630272
author Sohn, James J.
Lim, Sara
Das, Indra J.
Yadav, Poonam
author_facet Sohn, James J.
Lim, Sara
Das, Indra J.
Yadav, Poonam
author_sort Sohn, James J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Periodic imaging quality assurance (QA) of magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator (MRL) is critical. The feasibility of a new MRL imaging phantom used for QA in the low field was evaluated with automated image analysis of various parameters for accuracy and reproducibility. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The new MRL imaging phantom was scanned across every 30 degrees of the gantry, having the on/off state of the linac in a low-field MRL system using three magnetic resonance imaging sequences: true fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP), T1 weighted (T1W), and T2 weighted (T2W). The DICOM files were used to calculate the imaging parameters: geometric distortion, uniformity, resolution, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and laser alignment. The point spread function (PSF) and edge spread function (ESF) were also calculated for resolution analysis. RESULTS: The phantom data showed a small standard deviation - and high consistency for each imaging parameter. The highest variability in data was observed with the true fast imaging sequence at the calibration angle, which was expected because of low resolution and short scan time (25 sec). The mean magnitude of the largest distortion measured within 200 mm diameter with TrueFISP was 0.31 ± 0.05 mm. The PSF, ESF, signal uniformity, and SNR measurements remained consistent. Laser alignment traditional offsets and angular deviation remained consistent. CONCLUSIONS: The new MRL imaging phantom is reliable, reproducible, time effective, and easy to use for a 0.35 T MRL system. The results promise a more streamlined, time-saving, and error-free QA process for low-field MRL adapted in our clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10338140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103381402023-07-13 An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator Sohn, James J. Lim, Sara Das, Indra J. Yadav, Poonam Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article PURPOSE: Periodic imaging quality assurance (QA) of magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator (MRL) is critical. The feasibility of a new MRL imaging phantom used for QA in the low field was evaluated with automated image analysis of various parameters for accuracy and reproducibility. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The new MRL imaging phantom was scanned across every 30 degrees of the gantry, having the on/off state of the linac in a low-field MRL system using three magnetic resonance imaging sequences: true fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP), T1 weighted (T1W), and T2 weighted (T2W). The DICOM files were used to calculate the imaging parameters: geometric distortion, uniformity, resolution, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and laser alignment. The point spread function (PSF) and edge spread function (ESF) were also calculated for resolution analysis. RESULTS: The phantom data showed a small standard deviation - and high consistency for each imaging parameter. The highest variability in data was observed with the true fast imaging sequence at the calibration angle, which was expected because of low resolution and short scan time (25 sec). The mean magnitude of the largest distortion measured within 200 mm diameter with TrueFISP was 0.31 ± 0.05 mm. The PSF, ESF, signal uniformity, and SNR measurements remained consistent. Laser alignment traditional offsets and angular deviation remained consistent. CONCLUSIONS: The new MRL imaging phantom is reliable, reproducible, time effective, and easy to use for a 0.35 T MRL system. The results promise a more streamlined, time-saving, and error-free QA process for low-field MRL adapted in our clinical setting. Elsevier 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10338140/ /pubmed/37449023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100462 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Sohn, James J.
Lim, Sara
Das, Indra J.
Yadav, Poonam
An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator
title An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator
title_full An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator
title_fullStr An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator
title_full_unstemmed An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator
title_short An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator
title_sort integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 t magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100462
work_keys_str_mv AT sohnjamesj anintegratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator
AT limsara anintegratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator
AT dasindraj anintegratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator
AT yadavpoonam anintegratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator
AT sohnjamesj integratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator
AT limsara integratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator
AT dasindraj integratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator
AT yadavpoonam integratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator