Cargando…
An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator
PURPOSE: Periodic imaging quality assurance (QA) of magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator (MRL) is critical. The feasibility of a new MRL imaging phantom used for QA in the low field was evaluated with automated image analysis of various parameters for accuracy and reproducibility. METHODS A...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100462 |
_version_ | 1785071564616630272 |
---|---|
author | Sohn, James J. Lim, Sara Das, Indra J. Yadav, Poonam |
author_facet | Sohn, James J. Lim, Sara Das, Indra J. Yadav, Poonam |
author_sort | Sohn, James J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Periodic imaging quality assurance (QA) of magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator (MRL) is critical. The feasibility of a new MRL imaging phantom used for QA in the low field was evaluated with automated image analysis of various parameters for accuracy and reproducibility. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The new MRL imaging phantom was scanned across every 30 degrees of the gantry, having the on/off state of the linac in a low-field MRL system using three magnetic resonance imaging sequences: true fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP), T1 weighted (T1W), and T2 weighted (T2W). The DICOM files were used to calculate the imaging parameters: geometric distortion, uniformity, resolution, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and laser alignment. The point spread function (PSF) and edge spread function (ESF) were also calculated for resolution analysis. RESULTS: The phantom data showed a small standard deviation - and high consistency for each imaging parameter. The highest variability in data was observed with the true fast imaging sequence at the calibration angle, which was expected because of low resolution and short scan time (25 sec). The mean magnitude of the largest distortion measured within 200 mm diameter with TrueFISP was 0.31 ± 0.05 mm. The PSF, ESF, signal uniformity, and SNR measurements remained consistent. Laser alignment traditional offsets and angular deviation remained consistent. CONCLUSIONS: The new MRL imaging phantom is reliable, reproducible, time effective, and easy to use for a 0.35 T MRL system. The results promise a more streamlined, time-saving, and error-free QA process for low-field MRL adapted in our clinical setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10338140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103381402023-07-13 An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator Sohn, James J. Lim, Sara Das, Indra J. Yadav, Poonam Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article PURPOSE: Periodic imaging quality assurance (QA) of magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator (MRL) is critical. The feasibility of a new MRL imaging phantom used for QA in the low field was evaluated with automated image analysis of various parameters for accuracy and reproducibility. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The new MRL imaging phantom was scanned across every 30 degrees of the gantry, having the on/off state of the linac in a low-field MRL system using three magnetic resonance imaging sequences: true fast imaging with steady-state precession (TrueFISP), T1 weighted (T1W), and T2 weighted (T2W). The DICOM files were used to calculate the imaging parameters: geometric distortion, uniformity, resolution, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and laser alignment. The point spread function (PSF) and edge spread function (ESF) were also calculated for resolution analysis. RESULTS: The phantom data showed a small standard deviation - and high consistency for each imaging parameter. The highest variability in data was observed with the true fast imaging sequence at the calibration angle, which was expected because of low resolution and short scan time (25 sec). The mean magnitude of the largest distortion measured within 200 mm diameter with TrueFISP was 0.31 ± 0.05 mm. The PSF, ESF, signal uniformity, and SNR measurements remained consistent. Laser alignment traditional offsets and angular deviation remained consistent. CONCLUSIONS: The new MRL imaging phantom is reliable, reproducible, time effective, and easy to use for a 0.35 T MRL system. The results promise a more streamlined, time-saving, and error-free QA process for low-field MRL adapted in our clinical setting. Elsevier 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10338140/ /pubmed/37449023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100462 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Sohn, James J. Lim, Sara Das, Indra J. Yadav, Poonam An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator |
title | An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator |
title_full | An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator |
title_fullStr | An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator |
title_full_unstemmed | An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator |
title_short | An integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator |
title_sort | integrated and fast imaging quality assurance phantom for a 0.35 t magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37449023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100462 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sohnjamesj anintegratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator AT limsara anintegratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator AT dasindraj anintegratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator AT yadavpoonam anintegratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator AT sohnjamesj integratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator AT limsara integratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator AT dasindraj integratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator AT yadavpoonam integratedandfastimagingqualityassurancephantomfora035tmagneticresonanceimaginglinearaccelerator |