Cargando…

Machine learning-based classification of pineal germinoma from magnetic resonance imaging

INTRODUCTION: Surgical approaches for tissue diagnosis of pineal tumors have been associated with morbidity and mortality. The classification of images by machine learning (ML) may assist physicians in determining the extent of resection and treatment plans for a specific patient. Therefore, the pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Supbumrung, Suchada, Kaewborisutsakul, Anukoon, Tunthanathip, Thara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37456691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100231
_version_ 1785071609270239232
author Supbumrung, Suchada
Kaewborisutsakul, Anukoon
Tunthanathip, Thara
author_facet Supbumrung, Suchada
Kaewborisutsakul, Anukoon
Tunthanathip, Thara
author_sort Supbumrung, Suchada
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Surgical approaches for tissue diagnosis of pineal tumors have been associated with morbidity and mortality. The classification of images by machine learning (ML) may assist physicians in determining the extent of resection and treatment plans for a specific patient. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performances of the ML-based models for distinguishing between pure and non-germinoma of the pineal area. In addition, the secondary objective was to compare diagnostic performances among feature extraction methods. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with pineal tumors. We used the RGB feature extraction, histogram of oriented gradients (HOG), and local binary pattern methods from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans; therefore, we trained an ML model from various algorithms to classify pineal germinoma. Diagnostic performances were calculated from a test dataset with several diagnostic indices. RESULTS: MRI scans from 38 patients with pineal tumors were collected and extracted features. As a result, the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm with HOG had the highest sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI 0.78–0.84), while the random forest (RF) algorithm with HOG had the highest sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.79–0.85). Moreover, the KNN model with HOG had the highest AUC, at 0.845. Additionally, the AUCs of the artificial neural network and RF algorithms with HOG were 0.770 and 0.713, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The classification of images using ML is a viable way for developing a diagnostic tool to differentiate between germinoma and non-germinoma that will aid neurosurgeons in treatment planning in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10338348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103383482023-07-14 Machine learning-based classification of pineal germinoma from magnetic resonance imaging Supbumrung, Suchada Kaewborisutsakul, Anukoon Tunthanathip, Thara World Neurosurg X Original Article INTRODUCTION: Surgical approaches for tissue diagnosis of pineal tumors have been associated with morbidity and mortality. The classification of images by machine learning (ML) may assist physicians in determining the extent of resection and treatment plans for a specific patient. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performances of the ML-based models for distinguishing between pure and non-germinoma of the pineal area. In addition, the secondary objective was to compare diagnostic performances among feature extraction methods. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with pineal tumors. We used the RGB feature extraction, histogram of oriented gradients (HOG), and local binary pattern methods from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans; therefore, we trained an ML model from various algorithms to classify pineal germinoma. Diagnostic performances were calculated from a test dataset with several diagnostic indices. RESULTS: MRI scans from 38 patients with pineal tumors were collected and extracted features. As a result, the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm with HOG had the highest sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI 0.78–0.84), while the random forest (RF) algorithm with HOG had the highest sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.79–0.85). Moreover, the KNN model with HOG had the highest AUC, at 0.845. Additionally, the AUCs of the artificial neural network and RF algorithms with HOG were 0.770 and 0.713, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The classification of images using ML is a viable way for developing a diagnostic tool to differentiate between germinoma and non-germinoma that will aid neurosurgeons in treatment planning in the future. Elsevier 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10338348/ /pubmed/37456691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100231 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Supbumrung, Suchada
Kaewborisutsakul, Anukoon
Tunthanathip, Thara
Machine learning-based classification of pineal germinoma from magnetic resonance imaging
title Machine learning-based classification of pineal germinoma from magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Machine learning-based classification of pineal germinoma from magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Machine learning-based classification of pineal germinoma from magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning-based classification of pineal germinoma from magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Machine learning-based classification of pineal germinoma from magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort machine learning-based classification of pineal germinoma from magnetic resonance imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37456691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100231
work_keys_str_mv AT supbumrungsuchada machinelearningbasedclassificationofpinealgerminomafrommagneticresonanceimaging
AT kaewborisutsakulanukoon machinelearningbasedclassificationofpinealgerminomafrommagneticresonanceimaging
AT tunthanathipthara machinelearningbasedclassificationofpinealgerminomafrommagneticresonanceimaging